Advertisement

Adaptive Irrigation Management in Drought Contexts: Institutional Robustness and Cooperation in the Riegos del Alto Aragon Project (Spain)

  • Sergio Villamayor-Tomas
Chapter
Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

This chapter aims to understand the ability of more than 10,000 farmers in a large irrigation project to cooperate and adjust their water demands to cope with droughts. Causal inferences are formulated with the aid of common pool resource (CPR) theory as well as qualitative and quantitative evidence. According to the analysis, a series of robust water management institutions as well as additional land use factors contribute to the collective adaptation of farmers in drought conditions. Water management institutions include a flexible common property regime, effective environmental and social monitoring mechanisms, and decentralized administrative leadership. Land use factors include the existence of a moderate heterogeneity of farmers in their dependence from irrigated agriculture, the relatively substitutability of high and low water demand crops and a strong mechanism of government-sponsored income support subsidies. Overall, the analysis illustrates the interest of understanding adaptation from the perspective of CPR theory, as well as the usefulness of integrating the study of water and land use dynamics to understand sustainable management in the irrigation sector.

Keywords

Irrigation System Water Allocation Common Pool Resource Sprinkler Irrigation Water Demand Crop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acheson JM (2006) Institutional Failure in Resource Management. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29:1649–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araral E (2005) Bureaucratic incentives, path dependence, and foreign aid: an empirical institutional analysis of irrigation in the Philippines. Policy Sci 38:131–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrojo P, Bernal E (1997) El regadio en el valle del Ebro. In: López Galvez J, Naredo JM (eds), La Gestion del Agua de Riego. Fundacion Argentaria, Madrid, pp 139–181Google Scholar
  5. Cernea M, Meizein-Dick R (1992) Design for water user associations: organizational characteristics. In: Developing and improving irrigation and drainage systems. Technical paper no. 178. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 45–59Google Scholar
  6. CESA (2002) Informe Socioeconomico de la decada 1991-2000 en Aragon. Consejo Economico y Social de Aragon, ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  7. Chong H, Sunding D (2006) Water markets and trading. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copes P (1986) A critical review of the individual quota as a device in fisheries management. Land Econ 62:278–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copes P, Anthony C (2004) Socioeconomics of individual transferable quotas and community-based fishery management. Agric Resour Econ Rev 33:171–181Google Scholar
  10. Coward EW Jr (1977) Irrigation management alternatives: themes from indigenous irrigation systems. Agric Adm 4:223–237Google Scholar
  11. Cox M (2010) Exploring the dynamics of social-ecological systems: the case of the Taos valley acequias [thesis]. Type, Indiana University, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox M (2014) Applying a social-ecological system framework to the study of the Taos Valley irrigation system. Hum Ecol 42(2):311–324 Google Scholar
  13. Cox M, Ross JM (2011) Robustness and vulnerability of community irrigation systems: the case of the Taos valley acequias. J Environ Econ Manag 61:254–266Google Scholar
  14. Cox M, Arnold G, Villamayor Tomás S (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc 15Google Scholar
  15. Deressa TT, Hassan RM, Ringler C, Alemu T, Yesuf M (2009) Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Glob Environ Change 19:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garrido A (2007) Water markets design and evidence from experimental economics. Environ Resource Econ 38:311–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hisdal H, Tallaksen LM (2000) Drought event definition. In: Assessment of the regional impact of droughts in Europe. Department of Geophysics, University of Oslo, OsloGoogle Scholar
  18. Holland DS (2010) Markets, pooling and insurance for managing by catch in fisheries. Ecol Econ 70:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knox A, Meinzen-Dick R (2000) Collective action, property rights, and devolution of natural resource management: exchange of knowledge and implications for policy. In: CAPRI working papers. CGIAR, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Lam W (1998) Governing irrigation systems in Nepal. ICS Press, Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. Lam WF (2006) Foundations of a robust social-ecological system: irrigation institutions in Taiwan. J Inst Econ 2:203–226Google Scholar
  22. Lecina S, Isidoro D, Playán E, Aragüés R (2010) Irrigation modernization and water conservation in Spain: the case of Riegos del Alto Aragón. Agric Water Manag 97(10):1663–1675Google Scholar
  23. Liverman D (1990) Drought impacts in Mexico: climate, agriculture, technology, and land tenure in Sonora and Puebla. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 80:49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liverman D (1999) Vulnerability and adaptation to drought in Mexico. Nat Resour J 39:99–115Google Scholar
  25. Lopez Galvez J, Naredo JM (1997) La Gestion del Agua de Riego. In Economia y Naturaleza. Fundacion Argentaria, MadridGoogle Scholar
  26. López-Moreno JI, Vicente-Serrano SM, Angulo-Martínez M, Beguería S, Kenawy A (2010) Trends in daily precipitation on the northeastern Iberian Peninsula, 1955–2006. Int J Climatol 30:1026–1041Google Scholar
  27. Mas Ivars M (2012) Analisis para la Mejora de la Productividad en Aragon. CESA, ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  28. Meinzen-Dick R, Raju KV, Gulati A (2002) What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Dev 30:649–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melgarejo Moreno J (2000) De la política hidráulica a la planificación hidrológica, un siglo de intervención del Estado. In: Melgarejo Moreno J, Barciela Lopez C (eds) El Agua en la historia de España. Publicaciones Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, pp 295–324Google Scholar
  30. Mertz O, Mbow C, Reenberg A, Diouf A (2009) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation strategies in rural Sahel. Environ Manag 43:804–816Google Scholar
  31. Moreddu C, Anton J, von Lampe M, Martini R, Tallard G, Vavra P (2004) Analysis of the 2003 CAP reform. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Naylor R, Falcon W (2012) The Yaqui Valley’s agricultural transition to a more open economy. In: Matson P (ed) Seeds of sustainability: lessons from the birthplace of the green revolution in agriculture. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 107–38Google Scholar
  33. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom E (1992a) Crafting institutions for sel-governing irrigation systems, vol pp. ICS Press, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostrom E (1992b) The rudiments of a theory of the origins, survival, and performance of common-property institutions. In: Bromley DW (ed) Making the commons work: theory practice and policy. ICS Press, San Francisco, CA, pp 293–319Google Scholar
  36. Ostrom V, Ostrom E (1977) A theory of institutional analysis of common pool problems. In: Hardin G, Baden JA (eds) Managing the commons. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 157–172Google Scholar
  37. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games and common pool resources. Michigan University Press, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  38. Poteete AR, Ostrom E, Janssen M (2010) Working together. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Salvador R, Martínez-Cob A, Cavero J, Playán E (2011) Seasonal on-farm irrigation performance in the Ebro basin (Spain): crops and irrigation systems. Agric Water Manag 98:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Subramanian A, Jagannathan NV, Meinzen-Dick R (1997) User organizations for sustainable water services. The World Bank, Washington DC, vol 354Google Scholar
  42. Tang SY (1992) Institutions and collective action: self-governance in irrigation. Institution for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  43. UN/ISDR (2004) Living with risk: a global review of the international strategy for disaster reduction. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  44. Uphoff N, Meinzen-Dick R, Julien NS (1985) Improving policies and programs for farmer organization and participation in irrigation water management. Department of Government, Rural Sociology, and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  45. Vicente-Serrano SM, Cuadrat-Prats JM (2007) Trends in drought intensity and variability in the middle Ebro valley (NE of the Iberian peninsula) during the second half of the twentieth century. Theoret Appl Climatol 88:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Villamayor-Tomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural EconomicsHumboldt UniversityBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations