Model-Based Identification of Anatomical Boundary Conditions in Living Tissues
In this paper, we present a novel method dealing with the identification of boundary conditions of a deformable organ, a particularly important step for the creation of patient-specific biomechanical models of the anatomy. As an input, the method requires a set of scans acquired in different body positions. Using constraint-based finite element simulation, the method registers the two data sets by solving an optimization problem minimizing the energy of the deformable body while satisfying the constraints located on the surface of the registered organ. Once the equilibrium of the simulation is attained (i.e. the organ registration is computed), the surface forces needed to satisfy the constraints provide a reliable estimation of location, direction and magnitude of boundary conditions applied to the object in the deformed position. The method is evaluated on two abdominal CT scans of a pig acquired in flank and supine positions. We demonstrate that while computing a physically admissible registration of the liver, the resulting constraint forces applied to the surface of the liver strongly correlate with the location of the anatomical boundary conditions (such as contacts with bones and other organs) that are visually identified in the CT images.
KeywordsIterative Close Point Surface Load Constraint Force Iterative Close Point Deformable Image Registration
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Ahmadian, H., Zamani, A.: Identification of nonlinear boundary effects using nonlinear normal modes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 23(6), 2008–2018 (2009); Special Issue: Inverse ProblemsGoogle Scholar
- 6.Veress, A.I., Phatak, N., Weiss, J.A.: Deformable image registration with Hyperelastic Warping. In: Handbook of Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 487–533 (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Lin, T., Guyader, C.L., Dinov, I., Thompson, P., Toga, A., Vese, L.: A Landmark-Based Image Registration Model using a Nonlinear Elasticity Smoother for Mapping Mouse Atlas to Gene Expression Data. Sciences-New York (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Marami, B., Sirouspour, S., Capson, D.: Model-based deformable registration of preoperative 3D to intraoperative low-resolution 3D and 2D sequences of MR images. In: Fichtinger, G., Martel, A., Peters, T. (eds.) MICCAI 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6891, pp. 460–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Courtecuisse, H., Peterlik, I., Trivisonne, R., Duriez, C., Cotin, S.: Constraint-based simulation for non-rigid real-time registration. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, MMVR21, California, US (to appear, February 2014)Google Scholar
- 14.Rusinkiewicz, S., Levoy, M.: Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proc. of 3rd Conf. on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 145–152 (2001)Google Scholar
- 15.Vlachos, A., Peters, J., Boyd, C., Mitchell, J.L.: Curved PN triangles. In: Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 159–166 (2001)Google Scholar
- 17.Müller, M., Gross, M.: Interactive virtual materials. In: GI 2004: Proc. of Graphics Interface 2004, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 239–246. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society (2004)Google Scholar