Model-Based Identification of Anatomical Boundary Conditions in Living Tissues

  • Igor Peterlik
  • Hadrien Courtecuisse
  • Christian Duriez
  • Stéphane Cotin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8498)


In this paper, we present a novel method dealing with the identification of boundary conditions of a deformable organ, a particularly important step for the creation of patient-specific biomechanical models of the anatomy. As an input, the method requires a set of scans acquired in different body positions. Using constraint-based finite element simulation, the method registers the two data sets by solving an optimization problem minimizing the energy of the deformable body while satisfying the constraints located on the surface of the registered organ. Once the equilibrium of the simulation is attained (i.e. the organ registration is computed), the surface forces needed to satisfy the constraints provide a reliable estimation of location, direction and magnitude of boundary conditions applied to the object in the deformed position. The method is evaluated on two abdominal CT scans of a pig acquired in flank and supine positions. We demonstrate that while computing a physically admissible registration of the liver, the resulting constraint forces applied to the surface of the liver strongly correlate with the location of the anatomical boundary conditions (such as contacts with bones and other organs) that are visually identified in the CT images.


Iterative Close Point Surface Load Constraint Force Iterative Close Point Deformable Image Registration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahmadian, H., Mottershead, J., Friswell, M.: Boundary condition identification by solving characteristic equations. J. of Sound and Vibration 247(5), 755–763 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suzuki, A., Kamiya, K., Yasuda, K.: Identification technique for nonlinear boundary conditions of a circular plate. J. of Sound and Vibration 289(1-2), 130–147 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmadian, H., Zamani, A.: Identification of nonlinear boundary effects using nonlinear normal modes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 23(6), 2008–2018 (2009); Special Issue: Inverse ProblemsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, T.J., Sermesant, M., Cash, D.M., Barratt, D.C., Tanner, C., Hawkes, D.J.: Application of soft tissue modelling to image-guided surgery. Medical Engineering & Physics 27(10), 893–909 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferrant, M., Nabavi, A., Macq, B., Jolesz, F.A., Kikinis, R., Warfield, S.K.: Registration of 3-D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 20(12), 1384–1397 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Veress, A.I., Phatak, N., Weiss, J.A.: Deformable image registration with Hyperelastic Warping. In: Handbook of Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 487–533 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brock, K.K., Sharpe, M.B., Dawson, L.A., Kim, S.M., Jaffray, D.A.: Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. Medical Physics 32(6), 1647 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, T., Guyader, C.L., Dinov, I., Thompson, P., Toga, A., Vese, L.: A Landmark-Based Image Registration Model using a Nonlinear Elasticity Smoother for Mapping Mouse Atlas to Gene Expression Data. Sciences-New York (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dumpuri, P., Thompson, R.C., Dawant, B.M., Cao, A., Miga, M.I.: An atlas-based method to compensate for brain shift: Preliminary results. Medical Image Analysis 11(2), 128–145 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilles, B., Pai, D.K.: Fast musculoskeletal registration based on shape matching. In: Metaxas, D., Axel, L., Fichtinger, G., Székely, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5242, pp. 822–829. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marami, B., Sirouspour, S., Capson, D.: Model-based deformable registration of preoperative 3D to intraoperative low-resolution 3D and 2D sequences of MR images. In: Fichtinger, G., Martel, A., Peters, T. (eds.) MICCAI 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6891, pp. 460–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu, Y., Ahmed, H.U., Taylor, Z., Allen, C., Emberton, M., Hawkes, D., Barratt, D.: MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions. Medical Image Analysis 16(3), 687–703 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Courtecuisse, H., Peterlik, I., Trivisonne, R., Duriez, C., Cotin, S.: Constraint-based simulation for non-rigid real-time registration. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, MMVR21, California, US (to appear, February 2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rusinkiewicz, S., Levoy, M.: Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proc. of 3rd Conf. on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 145–152 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vlachos, A., Peters, J., Boyd, C., Mitchell, J.L.: Curved PN triangles. In: Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 159–166 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duriez, C., Dubois, F., Kheddar, A., Andriot, C.: Realistic haptic rendering of interacting deformable objects in virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(1), 36–47 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Müller, M., Gross, M.: Interactive virtual materials. In: GI 2004: Proc. of Graphics Interface 2004, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 239–246. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Peterlik
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Hadrien Courtecuisse
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christian Duriez
    • 2
  • Stéphane Cotin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut Hospitalo-UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.SHACRA TeamInriaFrance
  3. 3.AVR TeamCNRSFrance
  4. 4.Institute of Computer ScienceMasaryk UniversityCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations