System Delay in Flight Simulators Impairs Performance and Increases Physiological Workload
Delays between user input and the system’s reaction in control tasks have been shown to have a detrimental effect on performance. This is often accompanied by increases in self-reported workload. In the current work, we sought to identify physiological measures that correlate with pilot workload in a conceptual aerial vehicle that suffered from varying time delays between control input and vehicle response. For this purpose, we measured the skin conductance and heart rate variability of 8 participants during flight maneuvers in a fixed-base simulator. Participants were instructed to land a vehicle while compensating for roll disturbances under different conditions of system delay. We found that control error and the self-reported workload increased with increasing time delay. Skin conductance and input behavior also reflect corresponding changes. Our results show that physiological measures are sufficiently robust for evaluating the adverse influence of system delays in a conceptual vehicle model.
KeywordsHeart Rate Variability Vary Time Delay Skin Conductance System Delay Increase Time Delay
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Allison, R., Harris, L., Jenkin, M., Jasiobedzka, U., Zacher, J.: Tolerance of temporal delay in virtual environments. In: Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001, pp. 247–254 (2001)Google Scholar
- 2.Middendorf, M., Lusk, S., Whitley, J.: Power spectral analysis to investigate the effects of simulator time delay on flight control activity. In: AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, pp. 46–52 (1990)Google Scholar
- 3.Wildzunas, R.M., Barron, T.L., Wiley, R.W.: Visual display delay effects on pilot performance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67, 214–221 (1996)Google Scholar
- 5.Middendorf, M., Fiorita, A., McMillan, G.: The effects of simulator transport delay on performance, workload, and control activity during low-level flight. In: AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference (1991)Google Scholar
- 6.Riccio, G., Cress, J., Johnson, W.: The effects of simulator delays on the acquisition of flight control skills: Control of heading and altitude. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1186–1290 (1987)Google Scholar
- 9.Perfect, P., Jump, M., White, M.D.: Development of handling qualities requirements for a personal aerial vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 38th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Perry, A.R.: The Flightgear flight simulator. In: 2004 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Boston, MA (2004)Google Scholar
- 11.Hart, S., Staveland, L.: NASA Task Load Index (TLX) v1. 0 users manual (1986)Google Scholar
- 14.Camm, A., Malik, M.: Heart Rate Variability: Standards of Measurement. European Heart Journal of the Physiological Interpretation and Clinical Use (1996)Google Scholar