Advertisement

E-Portfolios – Fostering Systematic Reflection in Social Work Education

  • Patricia Arnold
  • Swapna Kumar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8524)

Abstract

Learning technologies in higher education open up new possibilities for academic professional development due to the flexibility in time and place they offer. For professional students it is important to develop a critical distance to their daily practice and a capacity for reflection. E-portfolio technology is considered to be suitable to help to develop such a reflective critical stance. In this paper we argue that in order for e-portfolios to foster reflection, a robust educational design with careful “scaffolding” is needed. We present a design in social work education that was meant to gradually develop students’ ability to reflect, while using a mixture of technologies. With three exemplary e-portfolios, we re-construct how students reflected on their professional trajectories, how they used the technology and how this was fostered by the educational design. A critical discussion leads to recommendations for using e-portfolio technology for fostering reflection in other settings.

Keywords

e-portfolios learning technologies professional students social work education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold, P.: Online peer-to-peer counseling as a new collaborative format in studying social work. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Technology Supported Learning & Training, Berlin (November 30-december 2, 2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold, P., Kumar, S.: Crossing Professional Thresholds with Networked Learning? An Analysis of Student E-Portfolios Using the Threshold Concept Perspective. In: Bayne, S., Jones, C., de Laat, M., Ryberg, T., Sinclair, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning (in press, 2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bäcker, E.-M., Cendon, E., Mörth, A.: Das E-Portfolio für Professionals. Zwischen Lerntagebuch und Kompetenzfeststellung. In: Zeitschrift für E-Learning, vol. 3, pp. 37–50. Studienverlag, Innsbruck-Wien-Bozen (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrett, H.C.: Electronic portfolios. In: Kovalchick, A., Dawson, K. (eds.) Educational Technology: an Encyclopedia, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer, R., Baumgartner, P.: Schaufenster des Lernens. In: Eine Sammlung von Mustern zur Arbeit mit E-Portfolio. Waxmann, Münster (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boud, D.J., Keogh, R., Walker, D. (eds.): Reflection: turning experience into learning. Kogan Page, London (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, J.S., Collins, A.: Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18, 32–42 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Häcker, T.: Das Portfolio als Instrument der Kompetenzdarstellung und reflexiven Lernprozesssteuerung. In: Tramm, T., Brand, W., (eds.), bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik – online, No. 8 (2005), http://www.bwpat.de/ausgabe8/txt/haecker_bwpat8-txt.htm (February 06, 2014)
  9. 9.
    Meyer, T., Mayrberger, K., Münte-Goussar, S., Schwalbe, C. (eds.): Kontrolle und Selbstkontrolle. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reinmann, G., Sippel, S.: Königsweg oder Sackgasse? E-Portfolios für das forschende Lernen. In: Meyer, T., Mayrberger, K., Münte-Goussar, S., Schwalbe, C. (eds.) Kontrolle und Selbstkontrolle, pp. 185–202. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schön, D.: The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schön, D.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spangler: Gerhard Kollegiale Beratung, 2nd expanded edn. Mabase, Nürnberg (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J.D.: Digital habitats: stewarding technology for communities. CPsquare, Portland (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Arnold
    • 1
  • Swapna Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Applied Social SciencesMunich University of Applied SciencesGermany
  2. 2.School of Teaching and LearningUniversity of FloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations