Advertisement

Designing Learning Tools: The Case of a Competence Assessment Tool

  • Enric Mor
  • Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán
  • Enosha Hettiarachchi
  • M. Antonia Huertas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8523)

Abstract

Advancements in technology offer new challenges and opportunities for online education. The interaction design of digital learning and assessment tools directly influence the learning experience. The aim of this work is to show the process of user-centered design and development of an online assessment tool that allows setting, monitoring and displaying the achievements of educational skills and competences. The main challenges addressed were: dealing with a rich and complex educational context;  researching the actual needs of the actors involved and managing the different requirements for the tool; the process to generate design solutions and the evaluation of the tool. It was evaluated in a real case scenario in a virtual learning environment of a fully online higher education institution.

Keywords

User-Centered Design Learning Tools Assessment Tools Competence Assessment Virtual Learning Environment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beldarrain, Y.: Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education 27(2), 139–153 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim, K., Bonk, C.J.: The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says. Educause Quarterly 29(4), 22 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keengwe, J., Kidd, T.T.: Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 6(2), 533–541 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unger, R., Chandler, C.: A Project Guide to UX Design: For User Experience Designers in the Field or in the Making. New Riders (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodwin, K.: Designing for the digital age: How to create human-centered products and services. Wiley (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    JISC, Learning in a Digital Age Extending higher education opportunities for lifelong learning (2012), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/Digilifelong/Lifelong%20Learning%20accessible%20PDF.pdf
  7. 7.
    Peters, O.: Digital learning environments: New possibilities and opportunities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 1(1) (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Higher Education Area, http://www.ehea.info/
  9. 9.
    Gonzales, J., Wagenaar, R.: Tuning Educational Structures in Europe (2003), http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/images/stories/Publications/Tuning_phase1_full.document.pdf
  10. 10.
    Moskal, B.M.: Scoring rubrics: what, when and how? Practical Assessment. Research & Evaluation 7(3) (2000), http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3
  11. 11.
    Cooper, B.S., Gargan, A.: Rubrics in Education Old Term, New Meanings. Phi Delta Kappan 91(1), 54–55 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reddy, Y.M., Andrade, H.: A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(4), 435–448 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gezie, A., Khaja, K., Chang, V.N., Adamek, M.E., Johnsen, M.B.: Rubrics as a Tool for Learning and Assessment: What Do Baccalaureate Students Think? Journal of Teaching in Social Work 32(4), 421–437 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tierney, R., Simon, M.: What’s still wrong with rubrics: focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 9(2) (2004), http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=2
  15. 15.
    Richey, R.C., Fields, D.C., Foxon, M.: Instructional design competences: The standards. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University, NY (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO/IEC.: 13407 Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems, ISO/IEC 13407: 1999 (E) (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research methods in human-computer interaction. Wiley (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edn. Wiley Publishing, Inc. (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moodle.org: Open-Source Community-based Tools for Learning, http://moodle.org/
  20. 20.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enric Mor
    • 1
  • Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán
    • 1
  • Enosha Hettiarachchi
    • 2
  • M. Antonia Huertas
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science, Multimedia and Telecommunication StudiesUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)Universitat Oberta de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations