Advertisement

Learner Engagement in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Activities: Natural or Nurtured?

  • Andriani Piki
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8523)

Abstract

Drawing on a mixed-methods study this paper aims to investigate what constitutes learner engagement and how postgraduate students engage in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) activities (such as video-conferencing and blogging) in a real-life setting. This research contributes to current literature by proposing the WISE Taxonomy of Learner Engagement Archetypes which portrays the most universal engagement approaches that emerged within the studied context. The findings show that CSCL activities may engage postgraduate students irrespective of their perceived preference over individual or social learning. The findings also suggest that given certain conditions students may strategically disengage from CSCL activities and as a result they may fail to appreciate CSCL as an authentic activity which leverages the opportunity to learn from and with each other, as well as from the wide range of digital resources openly available to them.

Keywords

learner engagement computer-supported collaborative learning collaborative technologies postgraduate education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Piki, A.: Towards a holistic conceptual framework of learner engagement in CSCL environments. In: The Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarke, J., Hunter, J., Wells, M.: Enhancing the Student Experience Using Web 2.0 Technologies (Wikis, Blogs and Webcam Recordings) to Encourage Student Engagement and to Develop Collaborative Learning: a Case Study. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL 2008), Cyprus (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D.: Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 409–426. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006), http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–15. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grabinger, S., Aplin, C., Ponnappa-Brenner, G.: Instructional Design for Sociocultural Learning Environments. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST) 10(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koschmann, T.: Dewey’s contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In: Stahl, G. (ed.) Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community: Proceedings of CSCL 2002, pp. 17–22. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Boulder (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jaques, D., Salmon, G.: Learning in groups: a handbook for face-to-face and online environments, 4th edn. Routledge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murphy, K., Alexander, P.: A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pintrich, P.R.: A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 667–686 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., Sheldon, B.: The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education, Champaign (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kearsley, G., Shneiderman, B.: Engagement Theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning (1999), http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
  12. 12.
    Pintrich, P.R.: A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 667–686 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ainley, M.: What do we know about student motivation and engagement? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stake, R.E.: The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7), 14–26 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.): Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.): Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Onwuegbuzie, A., Teddlie, C.: A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research, pp. 351–384. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Combs, J.P.: Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research, pp. 397–430. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Creswell, J.W.: Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairy, L., Johnson, L.: Data Reduction Techniques for Large Qualitative Data Sets. In: Guest, G., MacQueen, K.M. (eds.) Handbook for Team-based Qualitative Research, pp. 137–162. Rowman Altamira (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage (1994)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    CRLI (Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction), Scoring key for the approaches and study skills inventory for students (1997), http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/questionnaires/ASSIST.pdf
  26. 26.
    Tait, H., Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V.: ASSIST: A re-conceptualization of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In: Rust, C. (ed.) Improving Students as Learners, pp. 262–271. Oxford Brookes University, Center for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Brière, N.M., Senécal, C.B., Vallières, E.F.: Academic Motivation Scale (AMS-C 28): College (CEGEP) Version. Educational and Psychological Measurement 52 (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andriani Piki
    • 1
  1. 1.P.A. CollegeLarnacaCyprus

Personalised recommendations