Advertisement

Establishing the Relationship between Personality Traits and Stress in an Intelligent Environment

  • Marco Gomes
  • Tiago Oliveira
  • Fábio Silva
  • Davide Carneiro
  • Paulo Novais
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8482)

Abstract

Personality traits play a key role in the shaping of emotions, moods, cognitions, and behaviours of individuals interacting in a virtual environment. The personalities one exhibits reflect one’s perception of the world and are demonstrated in the act of communication. Thus, the evaluation of a message can be changed due to stress and mood variations. Being able to identify the degree of relationship between one’s personality characteristics and one’s current stress state can thus facilitate the communication process. In particular, in this paper it is studied the correlation between some personality traits and the stress levels exhibited by users’ interactions. To do so a novel approach was followed in which an intelligent environment is used to support the stress recognition process providing important personality related information. An experiment has been designed for the purpose of addressing the estimation of relevant aspects of interactions that occur in a rich sensory environment. Outputs from the experiment, such as the relation between personality characteristics and stress, can be used to maximize the benefits of virtual environments and its applications in fields such as learning, medicine or conflict resolution.

Keywords

Intelligent Environment Stress Emotions Personality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, M.: Toward a definition of virtual worlds. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research 1(1) (2008), http://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/index.php/jvwr/article/view/283
  2. 2.
    Carneiro, D., Castillo, J.C., Novais, P., Fernández-Caballero, A., Neves, J.: Multimodal behavioral analysis for non-invasive stress detection. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(18), 13376–13389 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa, P., MacCrae, R., Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI): Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources (1992), http://books.google.pt/books?id=mp3zNwAACAAJ
  4. 4.
    Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29(2-3), 131–163 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gebhard, P.: ALMA: A layered model of affect. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 29–36 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain, A., Bolle, R., Pankanti, S.: Introduction to biometrics. In: Jain, A., Bolle, R., Pankanti, S. (eds.) Biometrics, pp. 1–41. Springer, US (1996), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47044-6_1 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen, F.V.: Bayesian networks. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 1(3), 307–315 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nettle, D.: Personality: What Makes You the Way You are. OUP, Oxford (2007), http://books.google.pt/books?id=vk1kXARv1-IC
  9. 9.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A.: Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parsons, K.: Environmental ergonomics: A review of principles, methods and models. Applied Ergonomics 31(6), 581–594 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-68700000044-2
  11. 11.
    Rodrigues, M., Gonçalves, S., Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Fdez-Riverola, F.: Keystrokes and clicks: Measuring stress on e-learning students. In: Casillas, J., Martínez-López, F.J., Vicari, R., De la Prieta, F. (eds.) Management Intelligent Systems. AISC, vol. 220, pp. 119–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00569-0_15
  12. 12.
    Witten, I., Frank, E., Hall, M.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yampolskiy, R.V., Govindaraju, V.: Behavioural biometrics: A survey and classification. International Journal of Biometrics 1(1), 81 (2008), http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=18665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Gomes
    • 1
  • Tiago Oliveira
    • 1
  • Fábio Silva
    • 1
  • Davide Carneiro
    • 1
  • Paulo Novais
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of MinhoPortugal

Personalised recommendations