Advertisement

Identifying Change Patterns of Concept Attributes in Ontology Evolution

  • Duy Dinh
  • Julio Cesar Dos Reis
  • Cédric Pruski
  • Marcos Da Silveira
  • Chantal Reynaud-Delaître
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8465)

Abstract

Ontology versions are periodically released to ensure their usefulness and reliability over time. This potentially impacts dependent artefacts such as mappings and annotations. Dealing with requires to finely characterize ontology entities’ changes between ontology versions. This article proposes to identify change patterns at attribute values when an ontology evolves, to track textual statements describing concepts. We empirically evaluate our approach by using biomedical ontologies, for which new ontology versions are frequently released. Our achieved results suggest the feasibility of the proposed techniques.

Keywords

ontology evolution ontology changes change patterns ontology versioning biomedical ontologies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Groß, A., Dos Reis, J.C., Hartung, M., Pruski, C., Rahm, E.: Semi-automatic adaptation of mappings between life science ontologies. In: Baker, C.J.O., Butler, G., Jurisica, I. (eds.) DILS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7970, pp. 90–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dos Reis, J.C., Dinh, D., Pruski, C., Da Silveira, M., Reynaud-Delaitre, C.: Mapping adaptation actions for the automatic reconciliation of dynamic ontologies. In: Proc. of Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 599–608 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hartung, M., Groß, A., Rahm, E.: Conto-diff – generation of complex evolution mappings for life science ontologies. Biomedical Informatics, 15–32 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dos Reis, J.C., Pruski, C., Da Silveira, M., Reynaud-Delaitre, C.: Understanding semantic mapping evolution by observing changes in biomedical ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 47, 71–82Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dos Reis, J.C., Pruski, C., Da Silveira, M., Reynaud-Delaitre, C.: Characterizing semantic mappings adaptation via biomedical kos evolution: A case study investigating snomed ct and icd. In: Proc. of the AMIA Symposium, pp. 333–342 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noy, N.F., Klein, M.: Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and information systems 6(4), 428–440 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Javed, M., Abgaz, Y., Pahl, C.: Ontology change management and identification of change patterns. Journal on Data Semantics 2(2-3), 119–143 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: PROMPTDIFF: A Fixed-Point Algorithm for Comparing Ontology Versions. In: Proc. of AAAI 2002, pp. 744–750 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kremen, P., Smid, M., Kouba, Z.: Owldiff: A practical tool for comparison and merge of owl ontologies. In: 22nd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pp. 229–233 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaban-Nejad, A., Haarslev, V.: Bio-medical ontologies maintenance and change management. In: Sidhu, A., Dillon, T. (eds.) Biomedical Data and Applications, SCI 224, pp. 143–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gröner, G., Silva Parreiras, F., Staab, S.: Semantic Recognition of Ontology Refactoring. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6496, pp. 273–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Auer, S., Herre, H.: A Versioning and Evolution Framework for RDF Knowledge Bases. In: Virbitskaite, I., Voronkov, A. (eds.) PSI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4378, pp. 55–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rieß, C., Heino, N., Tramp, S., Auer, S.: EvoPat – Pattern-Based Evolution and Refactoring of RDF Knowledge Bases. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6496, pp. 647–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Djedidi, R., Aufaure, M.A.: ONTO-EVOAL an Ontology Evolution Approach Guided by Pattern Modeling and Quality Evaluation. In: Proc. Foiks 2010, pp. 286–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43, 907–928 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheatham, M., Hitzler, P.: String similarity metrics for ontology alignment. In: Alani, H., Kagal, L., Fokoue, A., Groth, P., Biemann, C., Parreira, J.X., Aroyo, L., Noy, N., Welty, C., Janowicz, K. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 294–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duy Dinh
    • 1
  • Julio Cesar Dos Reis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cédric Pruski
    • 1
  • Marcos Da Silveira
    • 1
  • Chantal Reynaud-Delaître
    • 2
  1. 1.Public Research Centre Henri TudorCR SANTECLuxembourg
  2. 2.LRIUniversity of Paris-Sud XIFrance

Personalised recommendations