Survey on Common Strategies of Vocabulary Reuse in Linked Open Data Modeling

  • Johann Schaible
  • Thomas Gottron
  • Ansgar Scherp
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8465)

Abstract

The choice of which vocabulary to reuse when modeling and publishing Linked Open Data (LOD) is far from trivial. There is no study that investigates the different strategies of reusing vocabularies for LOD modeling and publishing. In this paper, we present the results of a survey with 79 participants that examines the most preferred vocabulary reuse strategies of LOD modeling. The participants, LOD publishers and practitioners, were asked to assess different vocabulary reuse strategies and explain their ranking decision. We found significant differences between the modeling strategies that range from reusing popular vocabularies, minimizing the number of vocabularies, and staying within one domain vocabulary. A very interesting insight is that the popularity in the meaning of how frequent a vocabulary is used in a data source is more important than how often individual classes and properties are used in the LOD cloud. Overall, the results of this survey help in better understanding the strategies how data engineers reuse vocabularies and may also be used to develop future vocabulary engineering tools.

Keywords

#eswc2014Schaible 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bizer, C., Cyganiak, R., Heath, T.: How to publish linked data on the web. Web page (2007) (revised 2008) (access January 03, 2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web. Morgan Kaufmann (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hogan, A., Umbrich, J., Harth, A., Cyganiak, R., Polleres, A., Decker, S.: An empirical survey of linked data conformance. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 14–44 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simperl, E.: Reusing ontologies on the semantic web: A feasibility study. Data Knowledge Engineering 68, 905–925 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaible, J., Gottron, T., Scherp, A.: Extended description of the survey on common strategies of vocabulary reuse in linked open data modeling. Technical Report 01/2014, Institute for Web Science and Technologies, Universität Koblenz-Landau (2014) http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~fb4reports/2014/2014_01_Arbeitsberichte.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Auer, S., Demter, J., Martin, M., Lehmann, J.: LODStats – an extensible framework for high-performance dataset analytics. In: ten Teije, A., Völker, J., Handschuh, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., d’Acquin, M., Nikolov, A., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Hernandez, N. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS, vol. 7603, pp. 353–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2012), http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ekaw/ekaw2012.html#AuerDML12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vandenbussche, P.Y., Vatant, B., Rozat, L.: Linked open vocabularies: an initiative for the web of data. In: QetR Workshop, Chambery, France (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stadtmüller, S., Harth, A., Grobelnik, M.: Accessing information about linked data vocabularies with vocab.cc. In: Semantic Web and Web Science, 391–396 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hogan, A., Harth, A., Passant, A., Decker, S., Polleres, A.: Weaving the pedantic web. In: Proceedings of the Linked Data on the Web Workshop, LDOW 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poveda Villalón, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A.: The landscape of ontology reuse in linked data. In: Proceedings Ontology Engineering in a Data-driven World, OEDW 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyvönen, E.: Publishing and using cultural heritage linked data on the semantic web. Synthesis Lectures on The Semantic Web: Theory and Technology (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atemezing, G.A., Villazón-Terrazas, B., Hyland, B.: Best practices for publishing linked data. W3C note, W3C (2014), http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-ld-bp-20140109/ (access January 03, 2014)
  13. 13.
    d’Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Sabou, M., Angeletou, S., Motta, E.: Watson: Supporting next generation semantic web applications. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2007, pp. 363–371 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haase, P., Lewen, H., Studer, R., Tran, D.T., Erdmann, M., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: The neon ontology engineering toolkit. In: Korn, J. (ed.) WWW 2008 Developers Track (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaible, J., Gottron, T., Scheglmann, S., Scherp, A.: Lover: support for modeling data using linked open vocabularies. In: Proceedings of the Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johann Schaible
    • 1
  • Thomas Gottron
    • 2
  • Ansgar Scherp
    • 3
  1. 1.GESIS Leibniz-Institute for the Social SciencesCologneGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Web Science and TechnologiesUniversity of Koblenz-LandauGermany
  3. 3.Kiel University and Leibniz Information Center for EconomicsKielGermany

Personalised recommendations