Assessing Temporal Harmony: The Issue of a Balanced Time Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a detailed analysis of one of the central concepts of Zimbardo and Boyd’s time perspective theory: the balanced time perspective. Since their earliest works in the area, the issue of temporal harmony attracted attention of researchers and practitioners alike, especially within the field of positive psychology. Here, we provide a deepened consideration of the nature of balanced time perspective, its origins, and consequences. Moreover, we review the existing empirical operationalizations of temporal harmony, both those derived from the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and those created independently from it. We analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each method and reflect on future directions in research on the balanced time perspective issue.

References

  1. Boniwell, I. (2005). Beyond time management: How the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3(2), 61–74.Google Scholar
  2. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Time to find the right balance. The Psychologist, 16(3), 129–131.Google Scholar
  3. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo time perspective inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottle, T. J. (1976). Perceiving time. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time and Society, 17(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunkel, C. S., & Weber, J. L. (2010). Using three levels of personality to predict time perspective. Current Psychology, 29(2), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (2001). Cluster analysis. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, S. L., & Nowak, A. (2002). Dynamical patterns in bipolar depression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 380–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kazakina, E. (1999). Time perspective of older adults: Relationships to attachment style, psychological well-being and psychological distress. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  15. Kruger, D. J., Reischl, T., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). Time perspective as a mechanism for functional developmental adaptation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhlen, R. G., & Monge, R. H. (1968). Correlates of estimated rate of time passage in the adult years. Journal of Gerontology, 23(4), 427–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science, 15, 41–56.Google Scholar
  18. Lindvall, M. (2011). Förändring och förhållande till tiden ur ett balanserat tidsperspektiv. Psykologexamensuppsats, 30 hp, Institutionen för psykologi, Umeå universitet, Umeå.Google Scholar
  19. Magnusson, D. (1999). On the individual: A person-oriented approach to developmental research. European Psychologist, 4, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 3–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nuttin, J. R., & Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Leuven: Leuven University Press/Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Sircova, A., & Mitina, O. (2008). Balanced time perspective (BTP) as a resource of person’s optimal functioning. Paper presented at the 4th European conference on positive psychology, Opatija, Croatia.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis, theory, method and research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Stolarski, M., Bitner, J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time and Society, 20(3), 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stolarski, M., Zimbardo, P. G., Howell, R. T., & Zhang, J. W. (2012). Looking for the bright side of life: How to shape your time perspective to become happier? Paper presented at the 1st international conference on time perspective, Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
  27. Stolarski, M., Matthews, G., Postek, S., Zimbardo, P. G., & Bitner, J. (2013). How we feel is a matter of time: Relationships between time perspectives and mood. Journal of Happiness Studies. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9450-y.
  28. Sword, R. M., Sword, R. K. M., Brunskill, S. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2014). Time perspective therapy: A new time-based metaphor therapy for PTSD. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 19(3), 197–201. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2013.763632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomkins, S. S. (1980). Affect as amplification: Some modifications in theory. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience (Vol. 1, pp. 141–164). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  30. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1994). The stream of social judgment. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 251–255). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Webster, J. D. (2011). A new measure of balance time perspective: Initial psychometric findings from the balanced time perspective scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(2), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiberg, M., Sircova, A., Wiberg, B., & Carelli, M. G. (2012a). Operationalizing balanced time perspective in a Swedish sample. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 95–107.Google Scholar
  33. Wiberg, B., Wiberg, M., Carelli, M. G., & Sircova, A. (2012b). A qualitative and quantitative study of seven persons with balanced time perspective (BTP) according to S-ZTPI. Poster presented at the Ist international conference on time perspective and research: Converging paths in psychology time theory and research (pp. 120–120). ESPACOBRANCO.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Just think about it: Time to take our time. Psychology Today, 35, 62.Google Scholar
  36. Zimbardo, P. G. (2006, October). The secret power of time: Influencing personal decisions and national destinies. Paper presented at the Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  37. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-difference metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox. The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zimbardo, P. G., Sword, R. M., & Sword, R. K. (2012). The time cure: Overcoming PTSD with the new psychology of time perspective therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations