A Cross-Cultural Comparison on Contributors’ Motivations to Online Knowledge Sharing: Chinese vs. Germans

  • Bin Zhu
  • Qin Gao
  • Eike Nohdurft
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8528)

Abstract

Wikipedia is the most popular online knowledge sharing platform in western countries. However, it is not widely accepted in eastern countries. This indicates that culture plays a key role in determining users’ acceptance of online knowledge sharing platforms. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cultural differences between Chinese and Germans in motivations for sharing knowledge, and further examine the impacts of these motives on the actual behavior across two cultures. A questionnaire was developed to explore the motivation factors and actual behavior of contributors. 100 valid responses were received from Chinese and 34 responses from the Germans. The results showed that the motivations were significantly different between Chinese and Germans. The Chinese had more consideration for others and cared more about receiving reward and strengthening the relationship, whereas Germans had more concerns about losing competitiveness. The impact of the motives on the actual behavior was also different between Chinese and Germans.

Keywords

cross-cultural differences knowledge sharing Wikipedia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: Culture and cooperation. In: Hinde, R.A., Groebel, J. (eds.) Cooperation and Prosocial Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shim, J.P., Yang, J.: Why is Wikipedia not more widely accepted in Korea and China? Factors affecting knowledge-sharing adoption. Decision Line 40(2), 12–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G., Lee, J.-N.: Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 87–111 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu, S.: Exploring knowledge sharing behavior of IS personnel with theory of planned behavior (Master thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hendriks, P.: Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management 6(2), 91–100 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin, X.-L., Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K.: Predicting continuance in online communities: model development and empirical test. Behaviour & Information Technology 29(4), 383–394 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexandre, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., Stuedemann, R.: Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 10(1), 94–107 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oreg, S., Nov, O.: Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5), 2055–2073 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T.: Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(1), 64–77 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, Q., Davison, R.M., Gu, J.: Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25(3), 451–471 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., Wang, E.T.G.: Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(3), 1872–1888 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hars, A., Ou, S.: Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects. Paper Presented at the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA, Hawaii, January 3-6, pp. 1–9 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., Ang, C.S.: Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(1), 88–113 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hara, N., Shachaf, P., Hew, K.F.: Cross-cultural analysis of the Wikipedia community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(10), 2097–2108 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schacter, D.L., Daniel, T.G., Daniel, M.W.: Psychology. Worth Publishers (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98(2), 224–253 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Comrey, A.L., Lee, H.B.: A First Course in Factor Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaiser, H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1), 141–151 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cattell, R.B.: The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1(2), 245–276 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferguson, E., Cox, T.: Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 1(2), 84–94 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jørgensen, R.F.: Making sense of the German Wikipedia community. MedieKultur. Journal of Media and Communication Research 28(53), 101–117 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bin Zhu
    • 1
  • Qin Gao
    • 1
  • Eike Nohdurft
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations