Cultural Difference on the Usage Pattern of Tagging System for Knowledge Sharing

  • Zhe Chen
  • Qin Gao
  • Yuancheng Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8528)

Abstract

Collaborative tagging system in online knowledge sharing system benefits the knowledge management of users. It also inspires us a quantitative way how to investigate the effect of culture on knowledge management as tags reflects the usage pattern of users. In this study, the usage pattern of tag in three types of knowledge management websites (i.e. photo, bookmark and book sharing websites) present the influence of Chinese culture upon knowledge management. A set of indices is used to describe the usage pattern of tags and the results indicate that Chinese users behave differently in all three types of knowledge sharing system.

Keywords

tag knowledge sharing Chinese culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhagat, R.S., Kedia, B.L., Harveston, P.D., Triandis, H.C.: Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 204–221 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiu, L.H.: A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology 7(4), 235–242 (1972)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chow, C.W., Deng, F.J., Ho, J.L.: The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations: a comparative study of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12, 65 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davenport, T., Prusak, L., Wills, G., Alani, H., Ashri, R., Crowder, R., et al.: Working knowledge (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golder, S.A., Huberman, B.A.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta, A.K., Govindarajan, V.: Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs* 1. International Business Review 3(4), 443–457 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hambrick, D.C., Davison, S.C., Snell, S.A., Snow, C.C.: When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies 19(2), 181 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hofstede, G.: Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. Expiscations in Cross-Cultural Psychology, 335–355 (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holden, N.: Knowledge management: raising the spectre of the cross cultural dimension. Knowledge and Process Management 8(3), 155–163 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kipp, M.E.I., Campbell, D.G.: Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43(1), 1–18 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurman, J.: Why is Self-Enhancement Low in Certain Collectivist Cultures? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34(5), 496 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: HT 2006, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: HT 2006, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., Norenzayan, A.: Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2), 291 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shirky, C.: Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags. Clay Shirky\’s Writings About the Internet (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, K.: Chinese personality and its change (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhe Chen
    • 1
  • Qin Gao
    • 1
  • Yuancheng Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Human Factors & Ergonomics, Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations