Advertisement

An Evaluation Scheme for Performance Measurement of Facebook Use

An Example of Social Organizations in Vienna
  • Claudia Brauer
  • Christine Bauer
  • Mario Dirlinger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8527)

Abstract

Online social networks, and Facebook in particular, have evolved from a niche to a mass phenomenon. Organizations have recognized the importance of using Facebook to achieve their organizational goals. Still, literature lacks a systematic evaluation scheme for measuring the performance of an organization’s Facebook use. When investigating how organizations use Facebook, research tends to focus on for-profit organizations, overlooking the way social organizations use Facebook. This article introduces an evaluation scheme that includes nine categories of performance measurement. Applying the scheme to Facebook’s use by social organisations in Vienna, we demonstrate the scheme’s applicability. Plus, by using various indicators and benchmarks, we evaluate the level of sophistication of each organization’s use of Facebook. We investigated all 517 social organizations based in Vienna, including those in all fields of practice, based on publicly available Facebook data from January to June 2012. The analysis reveals that the majority of social organizations are beginners at utilizing Facebook’s potential.

Keywords

Facebook online social networks performance measurement social organizations evaluation scheme 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Richter, A., Koch, M.: Funktionen von Social-Networking-Diensten. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Royal Pingdom: Facebook, YouTube, our collective time sinks (stats) (2011) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Facebook, http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts (accessed April 18, 2013)
  4. 4.
    Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K.L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., Sweetser, K.D.: Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review 36, 90–92 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiefer, K.: Social Media Engagement deutscher NPO. Performance Management in Nonprofit-Organisationen 386 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lovejoy, K., Saxton, G.D.: Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media. J. of Computer. Mediated Communication 17, 337–353 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waters, R.D.: The use of social media by nonprofit organizations: An examination from the diffusion of innovations perspective. In: Handbook of Research on Social Interaction Technologies and Collaboration Software: Concepts and Trends. IGI, Hershey (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., Lucas, J.: Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review 35, 102–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiefer, K.: NGOs im Social Web. Eine inhaltsanalytische Untersuchung zum Einsatz und Potential von Social Media für die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit von gemeinnützigen Organisationen. Institut für Journalistik und Kommunikationsforschung. Universität Hannover, Hanover, Germany (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiefer, K.: NPOs im Social Web: Status quo und Entwicklungspotenziale. In: Fundraising im Non-Profit-Sektor, pp. 283–296. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Briones, R.L., Kuch, B., Liu, B.F., Jin, Y.: Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review 37, 37–43 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, D.: Nonprofit organizations and the emerging potential of social media and internet resources. SPNHA Review 6, 4 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reynolds, C.: Friends Who Give: Relationship-Building and Other Uses of Social Networking Tools by Nonprofit Organizations. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 2, 15–40 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heidemann, J., Klier, M., Landherr, A., Probst, F.: Soziale Netzwerke im Web–Chancen und Risiken im Customer Relationship Management von Unternehmen. Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management 3, 40–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reisberger, T., Smolnik, S.: Modell zur Erfolgsmessung von Social-Software-Systemen. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 565–577 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dimmel, N.: Sozialwirtschaft in der Sozialordnung. In: Dimmel, N. (ed.) Das Recht der Sozialwirtschaft, pp. 9–58. Wien/Graz, Austria (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Badelt, C., Pennerstorfer, A., Schneider, U.: Der Nonprofit Sektor in Österreich. In: Simsa, R., Meyer, M., Badelt, C. (eds.) Handbuch der Nonprofit-Organisation, pp. 55–75 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brocke, A., Faust, A.: Berechnung von Erfolgskennzahlen für Facebook Fan-Pages. ICOM 10, 44–48 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/business/build (accessed April 18, 2013)
  20. 20.
    Reimerth, G., Wigand, J.: Welche Inhalte in Facebook funktionieren: Facebook Postings von Consumer Brands und Retail Brands unter der Lupe. knallgrau, Vienna, Austria (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Brauer
    • 1
  • Christine Bauer
    • 2
  • Mario Dirlinger
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems & OperationsManagement Center Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria & Vienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems & OperationsVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  3. 3.WUK Bildung und BeratungViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations