Advertisement

Tangible Disparity - Different Notions of the Material as Catalyst of Interdisciplinary Communication

  • Michael Heidt
  • Linda Pfeiffer
  • Andreas Bischof
  • Paul Rosenthal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8510)

Abstract

Communicating tangible technology designs hinges on an adequate notion of materiality. However, academic disciplines involved employ wildly differing notions of the material. This issue effects communicative boundaries within interdisciplinary teams tasked with development of tangible digital artefacts. In order to address this problem, we provide an analysis of differing disciplinary modes of conceptualisation and theorisation. Following these considerations, we discuss theoretical artefacts able to serve as communicative interfaces between the disciplines in question.

Keywords

materiality interdisciplinarity cultural informatics critical technical practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Doering, T.: Material-centered design and evaluation of tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction - TEI 2011, p. 437 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dourish, P.: Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Floyd, C.: Software development as reality construction. In: Floyd, C., Züllighoven, H., Budde, R., Keil-Slawik, R. (eds.) Software Development and Reality Construction SE - 10, pp. 86–100. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heidt, M.: Examining interdisciplinary prototyping in the context of cultural communication. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU/HCII 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Pfeiffer, L., Rosenthal, P.: Diverse ecologies – interdisciplinary development for cultural education. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hicks, D.: The Material-Cultural turn. In: Beaudry, M.C., Hicks, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung, H., Stolterman, E.: Digital form and materiality: Propositions for a new approach to interaction design research. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, NordiCHI 2012, pp. 645–654. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerne, A.: Doing interface ecology: the practice of metadisciplinary. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Electronic Art and Animation, pp. 181–185 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerne, A., Mistrot, J.M., Khandelwal, M., Sundaram, V., Koh, E.: Using composition to re-present personal collections of hypersigns. InterfacesGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leonardi, P.M.: Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday 15(6)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization 18(3), 159–176Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loos, A., Opel, A., Mitchell, M.: Ornament and crime. Ariadne PressGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robles, E., Wiberg, M.: Texturing the “material turn” in interaction design. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction TEI 2010, p. 137 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vallgaarda, A., Redström, J.: Computational composites. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, pp. 513–522. ACM (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Heidt
    • 1
  • Linda Pfeiffer
    • 2
  • Andreas Bischof
    • 1
  • Paul Rosenthal
    • 2
  1. 1.Chemnitz University of Technology, Research Training Group crossWorldsChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Chemnitz University of Technology, Visual Computing GroupChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations