Home Networking: Smart but Complicated

  • Abbas Moallem
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8512)


Internet connection at home has fundamentally changed the way that appliances are designed in the same way that the invention of electricity did. Having efficient and reliable home networking is the key to any modern home. The number of devices that need to be connected to a home networking system increases every day. Computers, televisions, tablets, gaming devices and sound systems are just some of the many appliances that need that connection. Despite the improvements to the hardware of networking devices, re-search shows that the software to set up networking devices along with their configuration are extremely complicated. This paper presents the results of several usability investigations on home networking devices including: a comparative study of different product brands, two series of user surveys, and empirical observations. The results of these investigations show that all of the major brands of home networking appliances use a complex, feature-oriented, rudimentary user interface (UI) design with terms that are understood by a very small percentage of people.


Smart Device Home Networking Routers User Interface Wi-Fi Network 


  1. 1.
    TMC News. Cisco Home Networking Issues Consumer Survey [Professional Ser-vices Close - Up], August 31, 2011 TMC News (2011),
  2. 2.
    Grinter, R.E., Ducheneaut, N., Edwards, W.K., Newman, M.: The Work To Make The Home Network Work. In: ECSCW, pp. 469–488. Springer/Kluwer, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poole, E.S., Chetty, M., Grinter, R.E., Edwards, W.K.: More Than Meets the Eye: Transforming the User Experience of Home Network Management GVU Center, School of Interactive Computing. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, J., Edwards, W.K.: ICEbox: Toward Easy-to-Use Home Networking Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology (2007), (accessed on December 2011)
  5. 5.
    Cheng, J., Kunz, T.: A Survey on Smart Home Networking Inside the smart home, Springer. Carleton University, Systems and Computer Engineering, Technical Report SCE-09-10 (September 2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, W.K.: Before building the network or its components, first understand the home and the behavior of its human inhabitants. Communications of the ACM 54(6) (June 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shehan, E., Edwards, W.K.: Home Networking and HCI: What Hath God Wrought? In: CHI 2007 Proceedings, San Jose, CA, USA, April 28-May 3 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rashidi, P., Cook, D.J.: Keeping the Resident in the Loop: Adapting the Smart Home to the User. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics. Part AGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, J., Edwards, W.K., Haslem, D.: Eden: Supporting Home Network Manage-ment Through Interactive Visual Tools. In: UIST 2010, New York, USA, October 3-6 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brush, A.J.B., Lee, B., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, S., Saroiu, S., Colin Dixon, C.: Home Automation in the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities. In: CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M.D., Marek, K.D.: Inform H.M., Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study 29(2), 87–94 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moallem, A.: Why should home networking be complicated? In: Advances in Usabil-ity Evaluation. CRC Press (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moallem, A.: Location, location, location: About home networking devices location and features. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8012, pp. 107–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abbas Moallem
    • 1
  1. 1.College of EngineeringSan José State UniversitySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations