Snappy App: A Mobile Continuous Performance Test with Physical Activity Measurement for Assessing Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Zoe Young
  • Michael P. Craven
  • Maddie Groom
  • John Crowe
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8512)

Abstract

A Continuous Performance Test (CPT) was incorporated into a smartphone application (App) to measure three symptom domains associated with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD); attention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. The App was pilot tested on 11 healthy adults over three testing sessions. No differences in performance were found between testing sessions suggesting good test consistency. A decrement in performance over time was only found for one measure of attention and on one testing session. The CPT showed some sensitivity to ADHD-related symptoms where self-reported impulsive behaviour was related to the CPT measures of impulsivity and activity. User acceptability was good although some design improvements were suggested. Further pilot testing of the App in a clinical population is needed.

Keywords

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Continuous Performance Test m-Health Ecological interfaces New technology and its usefulness Psychological application for user interface Qualitative and quantitative measurement and evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Faraone, S.V., Biederman, J., Spencer, T., Wilens, T., Seidman, L., Mick, E., Doyle, A.E.: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: an overview. Biological Psychiatry 48(1), 9–20 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riccio, C.A., Reynolds, C.R.: Continuous performance tests are sensitive to ADHD in adults but lack specificity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 931(1), 113–139 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lis, S., Baer, N., Stein-en-Noss, C., Gallhofer, B., Sammer, G., Kirsch, P.: Objective measurement of motor activity during cognitive performance in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandianvica 122, 285–294 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    NICE: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: The NICE Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of ADHD in Children, Young People and Adults. National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 72. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health: The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faraone, S.V., Biederman, J.: Neurobiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry 44, 951–958 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogundele, M.O., Ayyash, H.F., Banerjee, S.: Role of computerised continuous performance task tests in ADHD. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry 15, 8–13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weinberg, W.A., Brumback, R.A.: The myth of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: the diagnostic utility of clinic-based tests. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 21, 394–402 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swanson, J.M., Flodman, P., Kennedy, J., Spence, M.A., Moyzis, R., Schuck, S., Murias, M., Moriarity, J., Barr, C., Smith, M., Posner, M.: Dopamine genes and ADHD. Neuroscience and Behavioural Reviews 24, 21–25 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biederman, J., Faraone, S., Milberger, S., Guite, J., Mick, E., Chen, L., Mennin, D., Marrs, A., Ouellette, C., Moore, P., Spencer, T., Norman, D., Wilens, T., Kraus, I., Perrin, J.: A prospective 4-year follow-up study of attention-deficit hyperactivity and related disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 53, 437–446 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vogt, C., Williams, T.: Early identification of stimulant treatment responders, partial responders and non-responders using objective measures in children and adolescents with hyperkinetic disorder. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 16, 144–149 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Leeuwen, T.H., Steinhausen, H.C., Overtoom, C.C., Pascual-Marqui, R.D., van’t Klooster, B., Rothenberger, A., Sergeant, J.A., Brandeis, D.: The continuous performance test revisited with neuroelectric mapping: Impaired orienting in children with attention deficits. Behavioural Brain Research 94, 97–110 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riccio, C.A., Waldrop, J.J.M., Reynolds, C.R., Lowe, P.: Effects of stimulants on continuous performance test (CPT). Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 13, 326–335 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tinius, T.P.: The integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test as a neuropsychological measure. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 18(5), 439–454 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doehnert, M., Brandeis, D., Imhof, K., Drechsler, R., Steinhausen, H.-C.: Mapping Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder from Childhood to Adolescence—No Neurophysiologic Evidence for a Developmental Lag of Attention but Some for Inhibition. Society of Biological Psychiatry 67, 608–616 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brocki, K.C., Tillman, C.M., Bohlin, G.: CPT performance, motor activity, and continuous relations to ADHD symptom domains: A developmental study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 7(2), 178–197 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teicher, M.H., Ito, Y., Glod, C.A., Barber, N.I.: Objective measurement of hyperactivity and attentional problems in ADHD.  Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 35(3), 334–342 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vogt, C., Shameli, A.: Assessments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: use of objective measurements.  The Psychiatrist 35(10), 380–383 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosser, B.A., Eccleston, C.: Smartphone applications for pain management. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 17(6), 308–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ofcom: International Communications Market Report (2013), http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr13/UK_4.pdf (accessed February 5, 2014)
  20. 20.
    Luxton, D.D., McCann, R.A., Bush, N.E., Mishkind, M.C., Reger, G.M.: mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 42(6), 505–512 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cyders, M.A., Smith, G.T., Spillane, N.S., Fischer, S., Annus, A.M., Peterson, C.: Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment 19, 107–118 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whiteside, S.P., Lynam, D.R.: The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 30(4), 669–689 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Epstein, J.N., Erkanli, A., Conners, K., Klaric, J., Costello, J.E., Angold, A.: Relations between continuous performance test performance measures and ADHD behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 31(5), 543–554 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoe Young
    • 1
    • 3
  • Michael P. Craven
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maddie Groom
    • 1
    • 3
  • John Crowe
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied PsychologyThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Electrical Systems & Optics Research Division, Faculty of EngineeringThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.NIHR MindTech Healthcare Technology Co-operativeThe Institute of Mental HealthNottinghamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations