Gamification of Joint Student/System Control over Problem Selection in a Linear Equation Tutor

  • Yanjin Long
  • Vincent Aleven
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8474)

Abstract

Integrating gamification features in ITSs has become a popular theme in ITSs research. This work focuses on gamification of shared student/system control over problem selection in a linear equation tutor, where the system adaptively selects the problem type while the students select the individual problems. In a 2x2+1+1 classroom experiment with 267 middle school students, we studied the effect, on learning and enjoyment, of two ways of gamifying shared problem selection: performance-based rewards and the possibility to redo completed problems, both common design patterns in games. We also included two ecological control conditions: a standard ITS and a popular algebra game, DragonBox 12+. A novel finding was that of the students who had the freedom to re-practice problems, those who were not given rewards performed significantly better on the post-tests than their counterparts who received rewards. Also, we found that the students who used the tutors learned significantly more than students who used DragonBox 12+. In fact, the latter students did not improve significantly from pre- to post-tests on solving linear equations. Thus, in this study the ITS was more effective than a commercial educational game, even one with great popular acclaim. The results suggest that encouraging re-practice of previously solved problems through rewards is detrimental to student learning, compared to solving new problems. It also produces design recommendations for incorporating gamification features in ITSs.

Keywords

DragonBox educational games student control shared control intelligent tutoring systems algebra classroom evaluation rewards 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, E., Gulwani, S., Popovic, Z.: A Trace-based Framework for Analyzing and Synthesizing Educational Progressions. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Comp. Systems, pp. 773–782. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, R.C.: Optimizing the Learning of a Second-Language Vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology 96, 124–129 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyce, A., Barnes, T.: BeadLoom Game: Using Game Elements to Increase Motivation and Learning. In: Proc. of Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2010, pp. 25–31 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corbalan, G., Kester, L., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G.: Selecting Learning Tasks: Effects of Adaptation and Shared Control on Efficiency and Task Involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(4), 733–756 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Easterday, M.W., Aleven, V., Scheines, R., Carver, S.M.: Using Tutors to Improve Educational Games. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 63–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grolnick, W.S., Ryan, R.M.: Autonomy in Children’s Learning: An Experimental and Individual Difference Investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 890–898 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson, G., McNamara, D.: Motivation and Performance in a Game- based Intelligent Tutoring System. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(4), 1036–1049 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, J.: DragonBox: Algebra Beats Angry Birds. Wired (2012), http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2012/06/dragonbox/all/
  9. 9.
    Long, Y., Aleven, V.: Supporting Students’ Self-Regulated Learning with an Open Learner Model in a Linear Equation Tutor. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.: Enhancing 5th Graders’ Science Content Knowledge and Self-Efficacy through Game-based Learning. Computers and Education 59(2), 497–504 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paas, F.G.W.C., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G.: Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology 86(1), 122–133 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shapiro, J.: It Only Takes about 42 Minutes To Learn Algebra with Video Games. Forbes (2013), http://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanshapiro/2013/07/01/it-only-takes-about-42-minutes-to-learn-algebra-with-video-games/
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanjin Long
    • 1
  • Vincent Aleven
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations