ISO2: A New Breath for the Joint Development of IS and ISO 9001 Management Systems

Conference paper

Abstract

We present ISO2, an approach for the joint development of information systems (IS) and ISO 9001 quality management systems (QMS). ISO2 was outlined from 14 retrospective case studies, occurred between 2008 and 2012. We then validated and refined the approach through action research. We support the idea that IS and QMS synergies are more important than the perspective of one system merely supporting the other. The ISO2 combines iterative development steps with a layered and incremental design framework, the O2. The O2 metaphor can provide a common abstraction level for the joint design. Over one million companies struggle with IS and QMS disintegration. Our findings offer new insights for the joint development of organizational systems.

Keywords

ISO2 Information systems Quality management systems Joint development Synergies 

References

  1. 1.
    Moyers B (2008) Fresh air [Radio broadcast]. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96648963. Accessed 8 May 2013
  2. 2.
    Cunha PR, Figueiredo AD (2005) Quality management systems and information systems: getting more than the sum of the parts. In: Proceedings of the AMCIS 2005Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO (2012) The ISO Survey of Certifications 2011. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO (2008) ISO:900 1:2008 quality management system—Requirement. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh PJ, Power D, Chuong SC (2011) A resource dependence theory perspective of ISO 9000 in managing organizational environment. J Operations Manage 29:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun ACM 31:1268–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kautz K, Madsen S, Nørbjerg J (2007) Persistent problems and practices in information systems development. Inf Syst J 17:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perez-Arostegui MN, Benitez-Amado J, Tamayo-Torres J (2012) Information technology-enabled quality performance: an exploratory study. Ind Manage Data Syst 112:502–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sánchez-Rodríguez C, Martínez-Lorente AR (2011) Effect of IT and quality management on performance. Ind Manage Data Syst 111:830–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forza C (1995) The impact of information systems on quality performance: an empirical study. Int J Operations Prod Manage 15:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juran JM, Gryna FM (1993) Quality planning and analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garimella KK (2006) The power of process: unleashing the source of competitive advantage. Meghan Kiffer Pr, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karapetrovic S, Fa MC, Saizarbitoria IH (2010) What happened to the ISO 9000 lustre? An eight-year study. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 21:245–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ward J, Peppard J (2002) Strategic planning for information systems, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO (2008) Guidance on the documentation requirements of ISO 9001:2008. ISO/TC 176/SC 2/N525R2. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bell M, Omachonu V (2011) Quality system implementation process for business success. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 28:723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J (1999) The unified software development process. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO (2008) ISO/IEC 12207:2008 Systems and software engineering—software life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larman C, Basili VR (2003) Iterative and incremental developments. a brief history. Computer 3(6):47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dybå T, Dingsøyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf Softw Technol 50:833–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Avison D, Wood-Harper AT, Vidgen RT, Wood JRG (1998) A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2. Inf Technol People 11:124–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wood-harper T (1991) Information systems development research: an exploration of ideas in practice. Comput J 34:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Avison D, Fitzgerald G (2003) Where now for development methodologies? Commun ACM 46:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jabnoun N, Sahraoui S (2004) Enabling a TQM structure through information technology. Competitiveness Rev 14:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu X, Gu Y (2009) Influence mechanism of information technology on quality management and organizational performance. In: Proceedings of the IIS 2009Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bonazzi R, Hussami L, Pigneur Y (2010) Compliance management is becoming a major issue in IS design. In: D’Atri A, Saccà D (eds) Information systems: people, organizations, institutions, and technologies. Springer Physica, Heidelberg, pp 391–398Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gunasekaran N, Arunachalam VP, Devadasan SR (2006) TISIT: a model for integrating TQM with software and information technologies. TQM Mag 18:118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spencer MS, Duclos LK (1998) TQM stress MIS. Am J Bus 13:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Keith R (1994) MIS + TQM = QIS. Qual Prog 27:29–31Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jensen TJ (1991) A framework for quality system design in “one of a kind” manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ 22:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fok LY, Fok WM, Hartman SJ (2001) Exploring the relationship between total quality management and information systems development. Inf Manage 38:355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Philip G, McKeown I (2004) Business transformation and organizational culture: the role of competency, IS and TQM. Eur Manage J 22:624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hemsworth D, Sánchez-Rodríguez C, Bidgood B (2008) A structural model of the impact of Quality Management Practices and purchasing-related Information Systems on purchasing performance: a TQM perspective. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 19:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li L, Markowski C, Xu L, Markowski E (2008) TQM—a predecessor of ERP implementation. Int J Prod Econ 115:569–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Attaran M (2004) Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Inf Manage 41:585–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yin R (1981) The case study crisis: some answers. Adm Sci Q 26:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Sci 1:248–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glick WH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: a reexamination of recent evidence. Acad Manage J 40:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf Organization 17:2–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baskerville R (1999) Investigating information systems with action research. Commun AIS 2:1–32Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baskerville R, Wood-Harper AT (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J Inf Technol 11:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Avison D, Lau F, Myers MD, Nielsen PA (1999) Action research. Commun ACM 42:94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hult M, Lennung S-Å (1980) Towards a definition of action research: a note and bibliography. J Manage Stud 17:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Susman GI, Evered RD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23:582–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Davison R, Martinsons MG, Kock N (2004) Principles of canonical action research. Inf Syst J 14:65–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Antunes A, Cunha PR (2013) Business processes the way they should be: tuning for low friction and sustainability. In: Proceedings of the ECIS 2013Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang P, Scialdone M, Ku M-C (2011) IT artifacts and the state of IS research. In: Proceedings of the ICIS 2011Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Iden J (2012) Investigating process management in firms with quality systems: a multi-case study. Bus Process Manage J 18:104–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cardwell G (2008) The influence of Enterprise Architecture and process hierarchies on company success. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 19:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jørgensen TH, Remmen A, Mellado MD (2006) Integrated management systems—three different levels of integration. J Clean Prod 14:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CTCV, Rua Coronel Veiga SimãoCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.CISUC, Department of Informatics EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations