Action Design Research in Practice: The Case of Smart Cities

  • Giovanni Maccani
  • Brian Donnellan
  • Markus Helfert
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8463)

Abstract

Smart Cities has emerged as an important research challenge among IS researchers in recent years. The grand claims that have been done about the potential of Smart Cities are grounded in a wide range of IT-related artifacts that were designed in theory and/or implemented in practice. Today, due to the growth of the level of knowledge maturity in this context, IS research in this field is more focused on the development of a nascent Smart City theory. The key concepts introduced in literature were collected through an eight-steps systematic literature review [19] and analyzed using [20]’s concept definition matrix. Based on this, this paper aims at reflecting upon research methodologies for conducting IS research in this field, and demonstrates the suitability of Action Design Research [43]. A Smart City research project that successfully used this methodology is also described to further support this statement.

Keywords

Smart Cities Action Design Research Systematic Literature Review 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hall, R.: The Vision of a Smart City. In: 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris (September 2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dirks, S., Keeling, M.: A Vision of Smarter Cities. IBM Institute for Business Value (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harrison, C., Donnelly, I.A.: A Theory of Smart Cities. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, Hull, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., Williams, P.: Foundation for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development (August 2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giffinger, R., Fertcher, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Meijers, E.: Smart Cities – Ranking of European Medium-size Cities. Vienna University of Technology (October 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen-Ritzo, C.H., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., Parr, F.: Instrumenting the planet. IBM Journal of Research and Development (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venkatesen, M.: ICT as an Enabler for Smart Water Management. ITU (October 2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stancic, Z.: Smart Electricity Distribution Network. European Commission Information Society and Media (July 2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., Yousef, W.: Modelling Smart City Performance. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research (June 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T.A., School, H.J.: Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. In: 4th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P.: Smart Cities in Europe. In: 3rd Central European Conference in Regional Science – CERS (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly 37(2), 337–355 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design Research in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maccani, G., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M.: A Comprehensive Framework for Smart Cities. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Smart Grids and Green IT Systems (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolfram, M.: Deconstructing Smart Cities: An Intertextual Reading of Concepts and Practices for Integrated Urban and ICT Development. REAL CORP 2012 Tagungsband, Schwechat (May 2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart Cities and Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation. In: The Future Internet. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boulton, A., Brunn, S.D., Devriendt, L.: Cyber infrastructures and ‘smart’ world cities: physical, human, and soft infrastructure. In: International Handbook of Globalisation and World Cities, Cheltenham, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abdulrahman, A., Meshal, A., Imad, F.T.A.: Smart Cities: Survey. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research (June 2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okoli, C., Schabram, K.: A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Sprouts (2010) ISSN 1535-6078Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 13–23 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nam, T., Prado, T.A.: Smart City as Urban Innovation: Focusing on Management, Policy, and Context. In: Proceedings of the 5th ICEGOV Conference, Tallin, Estonia, pp. 185–194 (September 2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell, W.: Intelligent Cities. e-Journal on the Knowledge Society (5) (2007) ISSN 1885-1541 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gasson, M., Warwick, K.: D12.2: Study on Emerging AmI Technologies. FIDIS Deliverables 12 (2) (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van den Besselaar, P., Koizumi, S. (eds.): Digital Cities 2003. LNCS, vol. 3081. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Komninos, N.: Intelligent Cities: Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. Routledge, London and New York (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toppeta, D.: The Smart City Vision: how Innovation and ICT can build smart, ‘liveable’, Sustainable Cities, Think! Report (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of Universities-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy. Elsevier (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., Scapin, D.: Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centered Design and User Experience towards User Cocreation. School’Living Labs - halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Angoso, J.L.: Smart Cities: The ICT Infrastructure for Ecoefficient Cities. In: High Level OECD Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Doobs, R., Remes, J., Manyika, J., Roxburgh, C., Smit, S., Schaer, F.: Urban World: Cities and the Rise of Consuming Class. McKinsey Global Institute (June 2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30(3), 611–642 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Odendaal, N.: Information and Communication Technology and Local Governance: Understanding the difference between Cities in Developed and Emerging Economies. Environment and Urban Systems (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldkuhl, G.: Anchoring Scientific Abstractions – Ontological and Linguistic Determination Following Socio-Instrumental Pragmatism. European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, Reading, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of MIS 24(3), 45–77 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jarvinen, P.: Action Research is similar to Design Science. Quality and Quantity (41), 37–54 (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cole, R., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Sein, M.K.: Being Proactive: Where Action Research meets Design Research. In: Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 325–336 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G.: Principles of Canonical Action Research. Information Systems Journal 14(1), 65–86 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Baburoglu, O.N., Ravn, I.: Normative Action Research. Organizational Studies (1992)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nandhakumar, J., Rossi, M., Talvinen, J.: The Dynamics of Contextual Forces of ERP Implementation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14(2), 221–242 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ivari, J., Venable, J.: Action Research and Design Science Research – Seemingly Similar but Decisively Dissimilar. In: 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona (2009)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Venable, J.R.: A Framework for Design Science Research Activities. In: Information Resource Management Association Conference, Washington DC (May 2006)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sein, K.M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 37–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Alsleben, M.: Creating Dynamic Capabilities: R&D Network Management for Globally Distributed Research and Development in the Software Industry. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mulligan, L.: Smart Cities and Sustainable Technology. Siemens Ltd. (2010)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Steinert, K., Marom, R., Richard, P., Veiga, G., Witters, L.: Making Cities Smart and Sustainable. The Global Innovation Index (2011)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., De Marez, L., Mechant, P.: Smart Ideas for Smart Cities: Investigating Crowd-sourcing for Generating and Selecting Ideas for ICT Innovation in a City Context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research (December 2012)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Leydesdorff, L., Deakin, M.: The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology 18(2), 53–63 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    MIT Living Labs, http://livinglabs.mit.edu
  50. 50.
    Komninos, M., Pallot, M., Schaffers, H.: Special Issue on Smart Cities and the Future Internet in Europe. Journal of Knowledge Economy (January 2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Martin, R.C.: Design Principles and Design Patterns. Object Mentor (2000)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kenneally, J., Prendergast, D., Maccani, G., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M.: Sustainable Connected Cities: Vision and Blueprint towards Managing IT for City Prosperity and Sustainability. In: European Design Science Symposium. Communication in Computer and Information Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J.: Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management (2009)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lee, J.H., Hancock, M.G.: Towards a Framework for Smart Cities: A Comparison of Seul, San Francisco & Amsterdam. Yonsei University (2012)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Digital Dublin, Digital Master Plan, http://digitaldublin.ie/masterplan/
  56. 56.
  57. 57.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategy for Qualitative Research. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1967)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Maccani, G., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M.: The Development of a Framework for Sustainable Connected Cities for Dublin, Ireland. In: 18th International Sustainable Innovation Conference, Surrey, UK (2013)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mettler, T.: Maturity Assessment Models: a Design Science Approach. International Journal Society Systems Science 3(1), 81–98 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Maccani
    • 1
  • Brian Donnellan
    • 1
  • Markus Helfert
    • 2
  1. 1.National University of IrelandMaynoothIreland
  2. 2.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations