ASA S3/SC1.4 TR-2014 Sound Exposure Guidelines for Fishes and Sea Turtles: A Technical Report prepared by ANSI-Accredited Standards Committee S3/SC1 and registered with ANSI pp 33-51 | Cite as
Sound Exposure Guidelines
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
Chapters cannot be read stand-alone. Please see complete SpringerBrief at: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-06659-2.
Keywords
Seismic Survey Peak Particle Velocity Lake Sturgeon National Marine Fishery Service Pile Driving
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
- Abbott R, Reyff J, Marty G (2005) Final report: monitoring the effects of conventional pile driving on three species of fish. Manson Construction Company, Richmond, CAGoogle Scholar
- Amoser S, Ladich F (2003) Diversity in noise-induced temporary hearing loss in otophysine fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2170–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JJ (1990) Assessment of the risk of pile driving to juvenile fish. In: Frauenheim JL (ed) Lessons of the 80's - Strategies of the 90's. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Member's Conference, Deep Foundations Institute, Seattle, Washington, 10–12 October 1990. Deep Foundations Institute, Hawthorne, New Jersey, p 1–11. http://www.cbr.washington.edu/papers/jim/deep.foundations.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2013
- Bolle LJ, de Jong CAF, Bierman SM, van Beek PJG, van Keeken OA et al (2012) Common sole larvae survive high levels of pile-driving sound in controlled exposure experiments. PLoS One. 2012, 7(3) e33052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033052
- Booman C, Dalen H, Heivestad H et al (1996) Effekter av luftkanonskyting pa egg, larver og ynell (Effects of airgun shooting on eggs, larvae, and personnel). Havforskningsinstituttet, ISSN 0071–5638.Google Scholar
- Brown RS, Carlson TJ, Gingerich AJ et al (2012) Quantifying mortal injury of juvenile Chinook salmon exposed to simulated hydro-turbine passage. Trans Am Fish Soc 141(1):147–157. doi: 10.1080/00028487.2011.650274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2009) Technical guidance for assessment and mitigation of the hydroacoustic effects of pile driving on fish (http://ter.ps/3xk). Appendix I, revised 2012, Compendium of pile driving sounds (http://ter.ps/3xl)
- Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2010a) Effects of pile driving sound on juvenile steelhead. Prepared by ICF for Jones and Stokes, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
- Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2010b) Necropsy and histopathology of steelhead Trout Exposed to Steel Pile Driving at the Mad River Bridges, US Highway 101, July 2009. Gary D. Marty, DVM, PhD, Fish Pathology Services, Abbotsford, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2004) Fisheries and hydroacoustic monitoring program compliance report for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge east span seismic safety project. Strategic Environmental Consulting, Inc. and Illingworth and Rodkin, Inc. June.Google Scholar
- Carlson TJ, Hastings MC, Popper AN (2007) Update on recommendations for revised sound exposure guidelines for fish during pile driving activities. CALTRANS-Arlington Memo Update 12-21-07Google Scholar
- Carlson TJ, Johnson GE, Woodley CM, Skalski JR, Seaburg AG (2011) Compliance monitoring of underwater blasting for rock removal at Warrior Point, Columbia River Channel Improvement Project 2009/2010. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNLL-20388), Richland, WAGoogle Scholar
- Carlson TJ, Weiland MA (2007) Dynamic pile driving and pile driving underwater impulsive sound. Report No. WA-RD 673.1,Washington State Department of Transportation. http://worldcat.org/digitalarchive/content/cdm266301.cdmhost.com/CBT/p266401coll4/0000067163/673.1.pdf Last Access 20 Dec 2013
- Casper BM, Halvorsen MB, Popper AN (2012a) Are sharks even bothered by a noisy environment? In: Popper AN, Hawkins AD (eds) The effects of noise on aquatic life. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, p 93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Casper BC, Popper AN, Matthews F, Carlson TJ, Halvorsen MB (2012b) Recovery of barotrauma injuries in Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha from exposure to pile driving sound. PLoS ONE 7(6):e39593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Casper BM, Halvorsen MB, Matthews F, Carlson TJ, Popper AN (2013a) Recovery of barotrauma injuries resulting from exposure to pile driving sounds in two sizes of hybrid striped bass. PLoS ONE 8(9):e73844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Casper BM, Smith ME, Halvorsen MB et al (2013b) Effects of exposure to pile driving sounds on fish inner ear tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol A 166:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cole RH (1948) Underwater explosions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Continental Shelf Associates, Inc. (CSA) (2004) Explosive removal of offshore structures -information synthesis report. US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA Study MMS 2003–070 http://www.data.boem.gov/PI/PDFImages/ESPIS/2/3042.pdf. Last Accessed 20 Dec 2013
- Dalen J, Knutsen, GM (1987) Scaring effects in fish and harmful effects on eggs, larvae and fry by offshore seismic explorations. In: Merklinger HM (ed) Progress in underwater acoustics. Plenum Press, London, p 93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Robertis A, Handegard NO (2013) Fish avoidance of research vessels and the efficacy of noise-reduced vessels: a review. ICES J Mar Sci 70:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doksaeter L, Rune G, Handegard O et al (2009) Behavioral responses of herring (Clupea harengus) to 1–2 and 6–7 kHz sonar signals and killer whale feeding sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 125:554–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doksæter, S, Handegard NO, Godø OR, Kvadsheim PH, Nordulud, N (2012) Behavior of captive herring exposed to naval sonar transmissions (1.0–1.6 kHz) throughout a yearly cycle. J Acoust Soc Am 131:1623–1642Google Scholar
- Dunning DJ, Ross QE, Geoghegan P et al 1992 Alewives in a cage avoid high-frequency sound. North Am J Fish Man 12:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eaton RC, Kimmel CB (1980) Directional sensitivity of the Mauthner cell system to vibrational stimulation in zebrafish larvae. J Comp Physiol 140:337-342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eaton RC, Lavender WA, Wieland CM (1981) Identification of Mauthner-initial-response patterns in the goldfish. Evidence from simultaneous cinematography and electrophysiology. J Comp Physiol 144:521-531Google Scholar
- Engås A, Løkkeborg S (2002) Effects of seismic shooting and vessel-generated noise on fish behaviour and catch rates. Bioacoustics 12:313–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engås A, Misund OA, Soldal AV, Horvei B, Solstad A (1995) Reactions of penned herring and cod to playback of original, frequency-filtered and time-smoothed vessel sound. Fisheries Res 22:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engås A, Løkkeborg S, Ona E, Soldal AV (1996) Effects of seismic shooting on local abundance and catch rates of cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:2238–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engås A, Haugland EK, Øvredal JT (1998) Reactions of cod (Gadus morhua L.) in the pre-vessel zone to an approaching trawler under different light conditions. Hydrobiologia 371/372:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feist BE (1992) Potential impacts of pile driving on juvenile pink (Oncorhyncus gorbuscha) and chub (O. keta) salmon behavior and distribution. MS Thesis, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- FHWG (Fisheries Hydroacoustic Working Group) (2008) Memorandum, agreement in principle for guidelines for injury to fish from pile driving activities, NOAA’s Fisheries Northwest and Southwest Regions, US Fish and Wildlife Service Regions 1 and 8, California/Washington/Oregon Departments of Transportation, California Department of Fish and Game, and US Federal Highway Administration. June 12, 2008. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/4019ED62-B403-489C-AF05-5F4713D663C9/0/BA_InterimCriteriaAgree.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2013
- Gaspin JB (1975) Experimental investigations of the effects of underwater explosions on swimbladder Fish, I: 1973 Chesapeake Bay Tests. Naval Surface Weapons Center Report NSWC/WOL/TR 75–58.Google Scholar
- Gitschlag GR, Herczeg BA (1994) Sea turtle observations at explosive removals of energy structures. Marine Fish Rev 56:1–8Google Scholar
- Goertner JF (1978) Dynamical model for Explosion injury to fish. Naval Surface Weapons Center White Oak Lab, Silver Spring, MD Report No. NSWC/WOL/TR-76-155Google Scholar
- Goertner JF, Wiley ML, Young GA, McDonald WW (1994) Effects of underwater explosions on fish without swimbladders. Naval Surface Warfare Center Report NSWC TR88-114Google Scholar
- Govoni JJ, Settle LR, West MA (2003) Trauma to juvenile pinfish and spot inflicted by submarine detonations. J Aquatic Anim Health 15:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Govoni JJ, West MA, Settle LR, Lynch RT, Greene MD (2008) Effects of underwater explosions on larval fish: implications for a coastal engineering project. J Coastal Res 24:228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Halvorsen MB, Casper BM, Woodley CM, Carlson TJ, Popper AN (2011) Predicting and mitigating hydroacoustic impacts on fish from pile installations. NCHRP Res Results Digest 363, Project 25–28, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/166159.aspx. Accessed 29 Jan 2013
- Halvorsen MB, Casper BM, Woodley CM, Carlson TJ, Popper AN (2012a) Threshold for onset of injury in Chinook salmon from exposure to impulsive pile driving sounds. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Halvorsen MB, Zeddies DG, Ellison WT, Chicoine DR, Popper AN (2012b) Effects of mid-frequency active sonar on fish hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 131:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Halvorsen MB, Casper BC, Matthews F, Carlson TJ, Popper AN (2012c) Effects of exposure to pile driving sounds on the lake sturgeon, Nile tilapia, and hogchoker. Proc Roy Soc B 279:4705–4714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Halvorsen MB, Zeddies DG, Chicoine D, Popper AN (2013) Effects of low frequency naval sonar exposure on three species of fish. JASA Express Letters, 134(2), EL206-210Google Scholar
- Handegard N (2010) Noise dose for aquatic animals: preliminary estimates for two seismic surveys. In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 9, Acoustical Society of America, p 1–13. doi:10-1121/1.3512758Google Scholar
- Hassel A, Knutsen T, Dalen J et al (2004) Influence of seismic shooting on the lesser sand eel (Ammodytes marinus). J Marine Sci 61:1165–1173Google Scholar
- Hastings MC (2008) Coming to terms with the effects of ocean noise on marine animals. Acoust Today 4(2):22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hastings MC, Reid CA, Grebe CC, Hearn RL, Colman JG (2008) The effects of seismic airgun noise on the hearing sensitivity of tropical reef fishes at Scott Reef, Western Australia. Underwater noise measurement, impact and mitigation. Proc Inst Acoust 30(5)Google Scholar
- Houghton J, Starkes J, Stutes J et al (2010) Acoustic monitoring of in situ exposures of juvenile coho salmon to pile driving noise at the port of Anchorage Marine Terminal redevelopment project, Knik Arm, Alaska. Paper presented at Alaska Marine Sciences Symposium, Anchorage, January 2010Google Scholar
- Hubbs CL, Rechnitzer AB (1952) Report on experiments designed to determine effects of underwater explosions on fish life. Calif Fish Game 38:333–366Google Scholar
- Jørgensen R, Olsen KK, Falk-Petersen IB, Kanapthippilai P (2005) Investigations of potential effects of low frequency sonar signals on survival, development and behaviour of fish larvae and juveniles. Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø NorwayGoogle Scholar
- Kane AS, Song J, Halvorsen MB et al (2010) Exposure of fish to high intensity sonar does not induce acute pathology. J Fish Biol 76:1825–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keevin TM, Hempen GL (1997) The environmental effects of underwater explosions with methods to mitigate impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers, St Louis District, St. Louis, MoGoogle Scholar
- Ketten DR, Cramer S, Arruda J et al (2005) Experimental measures of blast trauma in sea turtles. Symposium on Environmental Consequences of Underwater Sound, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
- Klima EF, Gitschlag GR, Renaud ML (1988) Impacts of the explosive removal of offshore petroleum platforms on sea turtles and dolphins. Marine Fisheries Rev 50:33–42Google Scholar
- Kostyuchenko LP (1973) Effects of elastic waves generated in marine seismic prospecting on fish eggs in the Black Sea. Hydrobiol J 9:45–46Google Scholar
- Kvadsheim PH, Sevaldsen EM (2005) The potential impact of 1–8 kHz active sonar on stocks of juvenile fish during sonar exercises. FFI/Report-2005/01027.Google Scholar
- Lenhardt ML (1994) Seismic and very low frequency sound induced behaviors in captive loggerhead marine sea turtles (Caretta caretta). In: Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB, Johnson DA, Eliazar PJ (eds) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, Springfield, VA, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-351, p 238–241Google Scholar
- Lokkeborg S, Ona E, Soldal A, Salthaug A (2012a) Effects of sounds from seismic airguns on fish behavior and catch rates. In: Popper AN, Hawkins AD (eds) The effects of noise on aquatic life. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, p 415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Løkkeborg S, Ona E, Vold A, Salthaug A (2012b) Sounds from seismic airguns: gear- and species-specific effects on catch rates and fish distribution. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:1278–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maes J, Turnpenny AWH, Lambert, DR et al (2004) Field evaluation of a sound system to reduce estuarine fish intake rates at a power plant cooling water inlet. J Fish Biol 64:938–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mann DA, Higgs DM, Tavolga WN, Souza MJ, Popper AN (2001) Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 109:3048–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mann DA, Lu Z, Popper AN (1997) A clupeid fish can detect ultrasound. Nature 389: 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCauley RD, Kent CS (2012) A lack of correlation between airgun signal pressure waveforms and fish hearing damage. In: Popper AN, Hawkins AD (eds) The effects of noise on aquatic life. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, p 245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCauley RD, Fewtrell J, Duncan AJ et al (2000) Marine seismic surveys – a study of environmental implications. APPEA J 40:692–706Google Scholar
- McCauley RD, Fewtrell J, Popper AN (2003) High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears. J Acoust Soc Am 113:638–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McKinstry C, Carlson T, Brown R (2007) Derivation of a mortal injury metric for studies of rapid decompression of depth-acclimated physostomous fish. PNNL-17080, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA. http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-17080.pdf Last Accessed 20 Dec 2013
- Mitson RB (1995) Underwater noise of research vessels. Cooperative Research Report, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. p 1–65 http://www.brasil-rounds.gov.br/round9/round9/guias_R9/sismica_R9/Bibliografia/Mitson%201995%20-%20Underwater%20noise%20of%20research%20vessels.pdf Last Accessed 20 Dec 2013
- Mitson RB, Knudsen HP (2003) Causes and effects of underwater noise on fish abundance estimation. Aquatic Liv Res 16:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moein SE, Musick JA, Keinath JA et al (1995) Evaluation of seismic sources for repelling sea turtles from hopper dredges. In: Hales LZ (ed) Sea turtle research program: summary report. Prepared for US Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA, and US Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, GA. Technical Report CERC-95, 90, p 75–78Google Scholar
- Nedwell JR, Turnpenny AWH, Lovell JM, Edwards B (2006) An investigation into the effects of underwater piling noise on salmonids. J Acoust Soc Am 120:2550–2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nedwell JR, Turnpenny AWH, Lovell J et al (2007) A validation of the dBht as a measure of the behavioural and auditory effects of underwater noise. Subacoustech Report No 534R1231Google Scholar
- Nestler JM, Ploskey GR, Pickens J, Menezes J, Schilt C (1992) Responses of blueback herring to high-frequency sound and implications for reducing entrainment at hydropower dams. N A J Fish Manage 12:667-683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nieukirk SL, Stafford KM, Mellinger DK, Dziak RP, Fox CG (2004) Low-frequency whale and seismic airgun sounds recorded in the mid-Atlantic Ocean. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1832–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Hara J, Wilcox JR (1990) Responses of loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, to low frequency sound. Copeia 199:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oldfield RG (2011) Aggression and welfare in a common aquarium fish, the Midas cichlid. J of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 14(4):340–360. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2011.600664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ona E, Godø OR, Handegard NO et al (2007) Silent research vessels are not quiet. J Acoust Soc Am 121:EL145- EL150Google Scholar
- Pearson WH, Skalski JR, Malme CI (1992) Effects of sounds from a geophysical survey device on behavior of captive rockfish (Sebastes ssp). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49: 1343–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peña H, Handegard NO, Ona E (2013) Feeding herring schools do not react to seismic airgun surveys. ICES J of Marine Science, doi. 10.1093/icesjms/fst079
- Popper AN, Hastings MC (2009) Effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes. J Fish Biol. 75:455–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Popper AN, Smith ME, Cott PA et al (2005) Effects of exposure to seismic airgun use on hearing of three fish species. J Acoust Soc Am 117:3958–3971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Popper AN, Halvorsen MB, Kane E et al (2007) The effects of high-intensity, low-frequency active sonar on rainbow trout. J Acoust Soc Am 122:623–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers PH, Zeddies DG (2008) Multipole mechanisms for directional hearing in fish. In: Webb JF, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Fish bioacoustics. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 233–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruggerone GT, Goodman SE, Miner R (2008) Behavioral response and survival of juvenile coho salmon to pile driving sounds. Natural Resources Consultants, Inc. for Port of Washington, 42pGoogle Scholar
- Sætre R, Ona E (1996) Seismiske undersøkelser og skader på fiskeegg og -larver; en vurdering av mulige effekter på bestandsnivå. Havforskningsinstituttet, Fisken og Havet nr. 8–1996. Seismic investigations and damage to fish eggs and larvae: an assessment of potential effects on the population level.Google Scholar
- Sand O, Karlsen HE, Knudsen FR (2008) Comment on “Silent research vessels are not quiet.” J Acoust Soc Am 123:1831–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sarà G, Dean JM, D’Amato D et al (2007) Effect of boat noise on the behaviour of bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Prog Ser 331:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scholik AR, Yan HY (2001) Effects of underwater noise on auditory sensitivity of a cyprinid fish. Hear Res 152:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scholik AR, Yan HY (2002b) The effects of noise on the auditory sensitivity of the bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Comp Biochem Physiol A 133:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simenstad CA (1974) Biological effects of underground nuclear testing on marine organisms. I. Review of documented shock effects, discussion of mechanisms of damage, and prediction of Amchitka test effects. In: Young GA (compiler), Proceedings of the First Conference on the Environmental Effects of Explosive and Explosions (30–31 May 1973). NOLTR 73–223, Naval Ordinance Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland. p. 86–97Google Scholar
- Skalski JR, Pearson WH, Malme CI (1992) Effects of sounds from a geophysical survey device on catch-per-unit-effort in a hook-and-line fishery for rockfish (Sebastes ssp.). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1357–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slotte A, Kansen K, Dalen J, Ona E (2004) Acoustic mapping of pelagic fish distribution and abundance in relation to a seismic shooting area off the Norwegian west coast. Fish Res 67:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smirnov AI (1959) The effect of mechanical agitation in different periods of development on the eggs of autumn chum salmon (Oncorhyncus keta INFRASP Autumnalis Berg, Salmonidae). Fish Res Board Canada Translation Ser 20 (originally in Russian). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 105, 873–876 (1955)Google Scholar
- Smith ME, Coffin AB, Miller DL, Popper AN (2006) Anatomical and functional recovery of the goldfish (Carassius auratus) ear following noise exposure. J Exp Biol 209:4193–4202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith ME, Kane AS, Popper AN (2004b) Acoustical stress and hearing sensitivity in fishes: does the linear threshold shift hypothesis hold water? J Exp Biol 207:3591–3602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Song J, Mann DA, Cott PA, Hanna BW, Popper AN (2008) The inner ears of northern Canadian freshwater fishes following exposure to seismic airgun sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 124:1360–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stadler JH, Woodbury DP (2009) Assessing the effects to fishes from pile driving: application of new hydroacoustic guidelines. Inter-Noise 2009Google Scholar
- Stephenson JR, Gingerich AJ, Brown RS et al (2010) Assessing barotrauma in neutrally and negatively buoyant juvenile salmonids exposed to simulated hydro-turbine passage using a mobile aquatic barotrauma laboratory. Fisheries Res, 106:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vasconcelos RO, Amorim MCP, Ladich F (2007) Effects of ship noise on the detectability of communication signals in the Lusitanian toadfish. J Exp Biol 210: 2104–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wardle CS, Carter TJ, Urquhart GG et al (2001) Effects of seismic airguns on marine fish. Cont Shelf Res 21: 1005–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weir CR (2007) Observations of marine sea turtles in relation to seismic airgun sound off Angola. Mar Turtle Newsletter 116:17–20Google Scholar
- Woodbury D, Stadler J (2008) A proposed method to assess physical injury to fishes from underwater sound produced during pile driving. Bioacoustics 17:289–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wright DG, Hopky GE 1998 Guidelines for the use of explosives in or near Canadian fisheries waters. Can Tech Rep Fis Aquat Sci 2107: iv + 34pGoogle Scholar
- Wysocki LE, Davidson JW III, Smith ME et al (2007) Effects of aquaculture production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 272:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yelverton JT, Richmond DR, Hicks W, Saunders K, Fletcher ER (1975) The relationship between fish size and their response to underwater blast. Report DNA 3677T, Director, Defense Nuclear Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Acoustical Society of America 2014