The Contemporary Research University and the Contest for Deliberative Space

Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I will argue that responses to neo-liberalism and new digital technologies have changed how research, teaching and learning are experienced. Realignment of work tasks has reduced the time and space required for achieving some important knowledge objectives that the academic community and society value. These include enlightenment ideas of seeking truth, reason, criticality and emancipation. I will lay the foundations for my analysis by starting with a consideration of these values, in terms of the purposes of a university education. In particular, I will introduce the concept of ‘worthwhile knowledge’. I will then explore neo-liberalism and how this ideology has transformed higher education and continues to exert influence and control over much of what is possible and permissible. Finally, I will make some observations about digital technology in the context of contemporary academic work and examine how technology not only changes the knowledge project but also influences neo-liberal reform. I will conclude with some thoughts on the idea of resistance and subversion to attain spaces for deliberative thinking.

Keywords

Neo-liberalism Teaching and learning Big data University education 

References

  1. Ball, S. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-Spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. (2011). Being a university. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, J. (2013). Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, M. (2011). The perceived impact of quality audit on the work of academics. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cribb, A., & Gerwitz, S. (2013). The hollowed-out university? A critical analysis of changing institutional and academic norms in UK higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 338–350.Google Scholar
  7. Custers, E. J. F. M. (2010). Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: A review study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Education Act. (1989). Part 14 Establishment and disestablishment of tertiary institutions, S162, 4(a)(v), New Zealand Government.Google Scholar
  9. Elton, L. (2000). The UK research assessment exercise: Unintended consequences. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(3), 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harland, T. (2016). Deliberate subversion of time: Slow scholarship and learning through research. In F. Trede & C. McEwen (Eds.), Educating the deliberative professional: Preparing practitioners for emergent futures. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Harland, T., McLean, A., Wass, R., Miller, E., & Sim, K. N. (2015). An assessment arms race and its fallout: High-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harland, T., & Pickering, N. (2011). Values in higher education teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Harland, T., Tidswell, T., Everett, D., Hale, L., & Pickering, N. (2010). Neoliberalism and the academic as critic and conscience of society. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harley, S. (2002). The impact of research selectivity on academic work and identity in UK universities. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartman, Y., & Darab, S. (2012). A call for slow scholarship: A case study on the intensification of academic life and its implications for pedagogy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassan, R. (2003). Network time and the new knowledge epoch. Time & Society, 12(2/3), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. York: The Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  19. Leisyte, L., & Dee, J. R. (2012). Understanding academic work in a changing academic environment. Faculty autonomy, productivity, and identity in Europe and the United States. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Pulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 123–206). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macfarlane, B. (2005). The disengaged academic: Retreat from citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the para-academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O., Galindo-Rueda, F., & Vignoles, A. (2007). Who actually goes to university? Empirical Economics, 32(2), 33–357 (special issue “The Economics of Education and Training”).Google Scholar
  23. Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global synthesis. Higher Education, 53, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Menzies, H., & Newson, J. (2007). No time to think. Academics’ life in the globally wired university. Time & Society, 16(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986–1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olsen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parkins, W. (2004). Out of time. Fast subjects and slow living. Time & Society, 13(2/3), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reisch, L. A. (2001). Time and wealth. The role of time and temporalities for sustainable patterns of consumption. Time & Society, 10(2/3), 367–385.Google Scholar
  29. Ryan, S., Burgess, J., Connell, J., & Egbert, G. (2013). Casual academic staff in an Australian University: Marginalised and excluded. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Staniforth, D., & Harland, T. (1999). The work of an academic: Jack of all trades or master of one? International Journal for Academic Development, 4(2), 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steger, M. B. (2013). Globalisation: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tight, M. (2010). Are academic workloads increasing? The post-war survey evidence in the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(2), 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Towers, I., Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J. (2006). Time thieves and space invaders: Technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(5), 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations