Toward an Open Learning Analytics Ecosystem

  • Mohamed Amine Chatti
  • Arham Muslim
  • Ulrik Schroeder
Chapter

Abstract

In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in learning analytics (LA) in technology-enhanced learning (TEL). LA approaches share a movement from data to analysis to action to learning. The TEL landscape is changing. Learning is increasingly happening in open and networked learning environments, characterized by increasing complexity and fast-paced change. This should be reflected in the conceptualization and development of innovative LA approaches in order to achieve more effective learning experiences. There is a need to provide understanding into how learners learn in these environments and how learners, educators, institutions, and researchers can best support this process. In this chapter, we discuss open learning analytics as an emerging research field that has the potential to deal with the challenges in open and networked environments and present key conceptual and technical ideas toward an open learning analytics ecosystem.

Keywords

Learning analytics Educational data mining Open learning analytics Ecosystem Personalization Learning as a network Lifelong learning 

References

  1. Alexander, S., Berg, A., Clow, D., Dawson, S., Duval, E., et al.(2014), OLA Press Release. Retrieved from http://solaresearch.org/initiatives/ola/.
  2. Benson, T. (2012). Why interoperability is hard. In Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED, Health Information Technology Standards (pp. 21–32). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bomas, E. (2014). How to give students control of their data. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/blog/give-students-control-data/.
  4. Brusilovsky, P., & Millan, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web, LNCS 4321 (pp. 3–53). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Cavoukian, A. (2009). Privacy by Design The 7 Foundational Principles. Retrieved from https://www.privacybydesign.ca/content/uploads/2009/08/7foundationalprinciples.pdf.
  6. Chatti, M. A. (2010). The LaaN theory. In Personalization in technology enhanced learning: A social software perspective (pp. 19–42). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Thüs, H., & Schroeder, U. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatti, M. A., Lukarov, V., Thüs, H., Muslim, A., Yousef, A. M. F., Wahid, U., et al. (2014). Learning analytics: Challenges and future research directions. eleed, Iss.10. (urn:nbn:de:0009-5-40350).Google Scholar
  9. Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 134–138). ACM.Google Scholar
  10. Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, A. (2013). Learning analytics interoperability—A survey of current literature and candidate standards. Retrieved from http://blogs.cetis.ac.uk/adam/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2013/05/learninganalytics-interoperability-v1p1.pdf.
  12. Cooper, A. (2014a). Open learning analytics network—Summit Europe 2014. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/open-learning-analytics-network-summit-europe-2014/.
  13. Cooper, A. (2014b). Learning analytics and interoperability—The big picture in brief. Learning Analytics Review, March 2014, ISSN: 2057-7494.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, A. (2014c). Standards and specifications—Quick reference guide. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/dpc/standards-specifications-quick-reference-guide/.
  15. Daniel, B., & Butson, R. (2014). Foundations of big data and analytics in higher education. In International Conference on Analytics Driven Solutions: ICAS2014 (pp. 39–47). Academic Conferences.Google Scholar
  16. Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 231–240). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  17. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–44.Google Scholar
  18. Dringus, L. P. (2012). Learning analytics considered harmful. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 87–100.Google Scholar
  19. Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 9–17). ACM.Google Scholar
  20. Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. In Proceedings of the LAK ’11 Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 104–109).Google Scholar
  22. Fry, J., Schroeder, R., & den Besten, M. (2009). Open science in e-science: Contingency or policy? Journal of Documentation, 65(1), 6–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2006). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Hardjono, T. (Ed.). (2015). User Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0. Retrieved from http://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-uma-core.html
  25. Hilton, J., Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(1), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoel, T. (2014). Standards and learning analytics—current activities 2014. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/blog/standards-learning-analytics-current-activity-2014/.
  27. Kay, J., & Kummerfeld, B. (2011). Lifelong learner modeling. In P. J. Durlach & A. M. Lesgold (Eds.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 140–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S. J. D., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. (2010). A data repository for the EDM community: The PSLC DataShop. In C. Romero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, & R. S. J. D. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of educational data mining (pp. 43–56). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laney, D. (2001). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity, and variety, application delivery strategies. META Group. Retrieved March 6, 2015, from http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-DataVolume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf
  30. Laney, D. (2012). The importance of ‘Big Data’: A definition. Gartner. Retrieved March 6, 2015, from http://www.gartner.com/resId=2057415.
  31. Liu, B. (2006). Web data mining. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H., (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Mazza, R. (2009). Introduction to Information Visualization. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. McNamara, T. (2012). Open Education: Emergence and Identity. Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://oh-institute.org/external_resources/pub/McNamara-OpenEd_Emergence_Identity-CC-by.pdf.
  35. Moody, D. L. (2003). Measuring the quality of data models: An empirical evaluation of the use of quality metrics in practice. In Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Information Systems, 2003.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Report. ISBN-978-92-64-03174-6. Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/givingknowledgeforfreetheemergenceofopeneducationalresources.htm.
  37. Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peters, M. A. (2008). The history and emergent paradigm of open education. In Open education and education for openness (pp. 3–16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romero, C., and S. Ventura. Educational data mining: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6):601–618, 2010.Google Scholar
  41. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.Google Scholar
  42. Sclater, N. (2014). Examining open learning analytics—report from the Lace Project meeting in Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/blog/examining-open-learning-analytics-reportlace-project-meeting-amsterdam/.
  43. Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). ACM.Google Scholar
  44. Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Haythornthwaite, C., Dawson, S., Shum, S. B., Ferguson, R., et al. (2011). Open learning analytics: An integrated & modularized platform. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Siemens, G.; Long, P.: Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. In: EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), September/October 2011.Google Scholar
  46. Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1509–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thüs, H., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (in review). Context capturing and modeling in open learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Society (IJAIED), IOS Press.Google Scholar
  48. Verbert, K., Drachsler, H., Manouselis, N., Wolpers, M., Vuorikari, R., & Duval, E. (2011, February). Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 44–53). ACM.Google Scholar
  49. Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 133–148.Google Scholar
  50. Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., & Klerkx, J. (2014). Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499–1514.Google Scholar
  51. Wiley, D. (2009). Introduction to Open Education. iTunesU. Lecture conducted from BYU, Provo.Google Scholar
  52. Yuan, L., Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. A white paper. Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Amine Chatti
    • 1
  • Arham Muslim
    • 1
  • Ulrik Schroeder
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatik 9 (Learning Technologies)RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations