Advertisement

The Political Turn Towards Happiness

  • Jan-Willem van der Rijt
Chapter
Part of the Happiness Studies Book Series book series (HAPS)

Abstract

The view that governments should actively promote the happiness of their citizens is gaining considerable popularity. Politicians and policymakers have joined forces with scientists who believe that recent scientific advances can be used to increase societal happiness levels and thereby improve the quality of human life. Whether governments should regard the direct promotion of happiness as a legitimate goal for public policy is, however, not a scientific, but a normative question, and many prominent authors in the history of political thought have considered the idea that governments should seek to promote societal happiness only to conclude that it ought to be rejected. In the current political turn toward happiness such opposing views have received very little attention. This paper canvasses possible reasons to be wary of the current political commitment to happiness, arguing that many of these reasons point toward genuine concerns that have not been given the level of attention they warrant and, therefore, should be taken far more seriously than presently fashionable.

Keywords

Public policy Happiness as governmental objective Science of subjective well-being Democracy Dignity 

References

  1. Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and Correlates of Happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353–373). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cahn, S., & Vitrano, C. (Eds.). (2008). Happiness. Classic and contemporary readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Constant, B. (1988). Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2004). Beyond money. toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frey, B. (2008). Happiness. A revolution in economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  9. Guyer, P. (2000). Kant on freedom, law and happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hausman, D., & Welch, B. (2010). To nudge or not to nudge. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haybron, D. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness. The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Helliwell, J., & H. Huang (2006) ‘How’s Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well-Being.’ NBER Working Paper Series 11988.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, T. (2002) Happiness and human flourishing. In: Human welfare and moral worth. Kantian perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 164–200.Google Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R. (2009) Democracy and happiness: What causes what?. In A. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.). Happiness, economics and politics. Towards a multi-disciplinary approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–184). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, R. (2002) Happiness as a rational end. In M. Timmons (Ed.). Kant’s metaphysics of morals. Interpretative essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 317–330.Google Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective wellbeing. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kant, I. (1996). The cambridge edition of the works of immanuel kant: Practical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kant, I. (1998). Religion within the boundaries of mere reason and other writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufman, P., Kuch, H., Neuhäuser, C., & Webster, E. (Eds.). (2011). Humiliation, degradation, dehumanization: human dignity violated. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Kolnai, A. (1995). Dignity. In R. Dillon (Ed.), Dignity, character, and self-respect (pp. 53–75). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Laborde, C., & Maynor, J. (Eds.). (2008). Republicanism and political theory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. Mill, J. S. (1982). On liberty. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Pacek, A. (2009) Politics and happiness: an Empirical Ledger. In A. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.). Happiness, economics and politics. Towards a multi-disciplinary approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Putnam, R. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ripstein, Arthur. (2009). Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schermer, M. (2011). Health, happiness and human enhancement—Dealing with unexpected effects of deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics,. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9097-5.Google Scholar
  29. Skinner, Q. (1983). Machiavelli on the maintenance of liberty. Politics, 18, 3–15.Google Scholar
  30. Thaler, R. & C. Sunstein (2008) Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations General Assembly (2011) Happiness: Towards a Holistic Approach to Development. Resolution 65/309. www.un.org.
  32. Van der Rijt (2013) Public Policy and the Conditional Value of Happiness Economics and Philosophy, 29, 381–408.Google Scholar
  33. Wall, S., & Klosko, G. (Eds.). (2003). Perfectionism and neutrality: Essays in liberal theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. (2011). The link between voting and life satisfaction in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 53, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, H. (1983). Kant’s political philosophy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations