Advertisement

Provably Secure Certificateless Authenticated Asymmetric Group Key Agreement

  • Lei Zhang
  • Qianhong Wu
  • Bo Qin
  • Hua Deng
  • Jianwei Liu
  • WenChang Shi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8434)

Abstract

Asymmetric group key agreement allows a group of members to establish a public group encryption key while each member has a different secret decryption key. Knowing the group encryption key, a sender can encrypt to the group members so that only the members can decrypt. This paper studies authenticated asymmetric group key agreement in certificateless public key cryptography. We formalize the security model of certificateless authenticated asymmetric group key agreement and capture typical attacks in the real world. We next present a strongly unforgeable stateful certificateless batch multi-signature scheme as building block and realize a one-round certificatless authenticated asymmetric group key agreement protocol to resist active attacks. Both the new multi-signature scheme and the resulting group key agreement protocol are shown to be secure under the well-established computational Diffie-Hellman and the k-Bilinear Diffie-Hellman exponent assumptions in the random oracle model, respectively.

Keywords

Certificateless public key cryptography group key agreement asymmetric group key agreement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Riyami, S.S., Paterson, K.G.: Certificateless public key cryptography. In: Laih, C.-S. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2894, pp. 452–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boneh, D., Boyen, X., Goh, E.-J.: Hierarchical identity based encryption with constant size ciphertext. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 440–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boneh, D., Silverberg, A.: Applications of multilinear forms to cryptography. Contemporary Mathematics 324, 71–90 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd, C., González-Nieto, J.: Round-optimal contributory conference key agreement. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) PKC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2567, pp. 161–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd, C., Mathuria, A.: Protocols for authentication and key establishment, pp. 9–10. Springer (2003) ISBN:3-540-43107-1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bresson, E., Catalano, D.: Constant round authenticated group key agreement via distributed computation. In: Bao, F., Deng, R., Zhou, J. (eds.) PKC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2947, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bresson, E., Chevassut, O., Pointcheval, D., Quisquater, J.: Provably authenticated group Diffie-Hellman key exchange. In: ACM CCS 2001, pp. 255–264 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burmester, M., Desmedt, Y.G.: A secure and efficient conference key distribution system. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 275–286. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi, K.Y., Hwang, J.Y., Lee, D.H.: Efficient ID-based group key agreement with bilinear maps. In: Bao, F., Deng, R., Zhou, J. (eds.) PKC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2947, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dent, A.W., Libert, B., Paterson, K.G.: Certificateless encryption schemes strongly secure in the standard model. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) PKC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4939, pp. 344–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dutta, R., Barua, R.: Provably secure constant round contributory group key agreement in dynamic setting. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 54(5), 2007–2025 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujisaki, E., Okamoto, T.: Secure integration of asymmetric and symmetric encryption schemes. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 537–554. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg, S., Gentry, C., Halevi, S.: Candidate multilinear maps from ideal lattices. In: Johansson, T., Nguyen, P.Q. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7881, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, X., Mu, Y., Susilo, W., Wong, D.S., Wu, W.: Certificateless signature revisited. In: Pieprzyk, J., Ghodosi, H., Dawson, E. (eds.) ACISP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4586, pp. 308–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz, J., Shin, J.: Modeling insider attacks on group key-exchange protocols. In: ACM CCS 2005, pp. 180–189 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lv, X., Li, H., Wang, B.: Authenticated asymmetric group key agreement based on certificateless cryptosystem. International Journal of Computer Mathematics (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2013.806653
  17. 17.
    Shamir, A.: Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. In: Blakely, G.R., Chaum, D. (eds.) CRYPTO 1984. LNCS, vol. 196, pp. 47–53. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wei, G., Yang, X., Shao, J.: Efficient certificateless authenticated asymmetric group key agreement protocol. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems 6(12) (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu, Q., Mu, Y., Susilo, W., Qin, B., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: Asymmetric group key agreement. In: Joux, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5479, pp. 153–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu, Q., Qin, B., Zhang, L., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Farràs, O.: Bridging Broadcast Encryption and Group Key Agreement. In: Lee, D.H., Wang, X. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 7073, pp. 143–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu, Q., Qin, B., Zhang, L., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Manjón, J.A.: Fast Transmission to Remote Cooperative Groups: A New Key Management Paradigm. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 21(2), 621–633 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, L., Wu, Q., Qin, B., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: Identity-based authenticated asymmetric group key agreement protocol. In: Thai, M.T., Sahni, S. (eds.) COCOON 2010. LNCS, vol. 6196, pp. 510–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, L., Wu, Q., Qin, B., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: Asymmetric group key agreement protocol for open networks and its application to broadcast encryption. Computer Networks 55(15), 3246–3255 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, L., Zhang, F., Wu, Q., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: Simulatable certificateless two-party authenticated key agreement protocol. Information Sciences 180(6), 1020–1030 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Zhang
    • 1
  • Qianhong Wu
    • 2
  • Bo Qin
    • 3
  • Hua Deng
    • 4
  • Jianwei Liu
    • 2
  • WenChang Shi
    • 3
  1. 1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing, Software Engineering InstituteEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Electronic and Information EngineeringBeihang UniversityChina
  3. 3.School of InformationRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of ComputerWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations