Advertisement

Advances in Large-Scale Mudflat Surveying: The Roebuck Bay and Eighty Mile Beach, Western Australia Examples

  • Robert J. HickeyEmail author
  • Grant B. Pearson
  • Theunis Piersma
Chapter
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 8)

Abstract

The shores of Roebuck Bay and Eighty Mile Beach in northwestern Australia are amongst the richest known intertidal mudflats worldwide. They are both listed as Wetlands of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention, primarily because of the high numbers of shorebirds that migrate to and from these sites every year. There are only a dozen or so areas in the world with extensive intertidal flats rich in shorebirds.

Shorebird studies by a collaboration between The Department of Environment and Conservation, The University of Western Australia, The Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Central Washington University, Broome Bird Observatory, and local community volunteers in northwestern Australia have focused on understanding the geological and biological processes of coastal tidal mudflats. Studies have established that invertebrates are abundant and they are used for feeding by resident and migratory shorebirds.

In addition to requiring equipment, software, and considerable organization, these labor intensive studies were only possible with the assistance of large numbers of community volunteers, professionals, and donated equipment.

Keywords

Neap Tide Intertidal Flat Ramsar Convention Ramsar Site Northern Shore 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

A great many people have contributed to the success of these community based research projects that have established Roebuck Bay and Eighty Mile Beach as special wetlands with unique properties. To all these people we express our gratitude and our hope that we can continue to work together on projects that strengthen the arguments for conservation of these wetlands.

References

  1. Australian Nature Conservation Agency (ANCA) (1996) A directory of important Wetlands in Australia, 2nd edn. ANCA, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. Battley PF, Warnock N, Tibbitts TL et al (2012) Contrasting extreme long-distance migration patterns in bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica. J Avian Biol 43:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carew R, Hickey R (2000) Determination of a generalized tidal inundation model for Roebuck Bay (Western Australia) using an integrated GIS and remote sensing approach. Trans GIS 4(2):99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Compton TJ, Drent J, Kentie R et al (2007a) Overlap in the feeding morphology of bivalves from species-rich and species-poor intertidal flats using gill: palp ratios for comparative analyses of mollusc assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 348:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compton TJ, Rijkenberg MJA, Drent J et al (2007b) Thermal tolerance and climate variability: a comparison between bivalves from differing climates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 352:200–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crean M (2000) GIS and remote sensing to tidal mudflat mapping Eighty-Mile Beach, Western Australia. Honours thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, p 77Google Scholar
  7. De Goeij P, Lavaleye M, Pearson G et al (2003) Seasonal changes in the macro-zoobenthos of a tropical mudflat. NIOZ-Report 2003–4. Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, p 49Google Scholar
  8. Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) (2011) Community Involvement Annual Report 2010–2011. Available via http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/community-and-education/volunteer-programs.html. Accessed 13 Nov 2013
  9. Hickey, R, Carew R, Watkins R et al (2000) Tidal inundation modelling, Roebuck Bay, Western Australia. GIS Asia Pacific, February/March, pp 47–50Google Scholar
  10. Hickey R, Pearson G, Piersma T (2003) Maps, mud, and birds. Geospat Solutions 13(7):40–43Google Scholar
  11. Honkoop P, Pearson G, Lavaleye M et al (2006) Spatial variation of the intertidal sediments and macrozoo-benthic assemblages along Eighty-mile Beach, North-western Australia. J Sea Res 55:278–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pepping M, Piersma T, Pearson G et al (eds) (1999) Intertidal sediments and benthic animals of Roebuck Bay, Western Australia. Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), TexelGoogle Scholar
  13. Piersma T, Pearson G, Hickey R et al (eds) (2005) The long mud: benthos and shorebirds of the foreshore of Eighty-Mile Beach, Western Australia. NIOZ Report 2005-2. Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, 218 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Piersma T, Pearson G, Hickey R et al (2006) Roebuck Bay invertebrate and bird mapping 2006. Research report. Available from http://www.onlinegeographer.com/roebim06/ROEBIM06_prog_rep140806.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2013
  15. Ramsar (2013) The Ramsar convention manual, 6th edn. Available via http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/manual6-2013-e.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2013
  16. Rogers, DI, Taylor I (2001) Conservation and ecology of migratory shorebirds in Roebuck Bay, North-western Australia. Final Report for the Wetlands Unit. Environment Australia. Albury: Charles Sturt UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers DI, Battley P, Russell M et al (2000) A high count of Asian Dowitchers in Roebuck Bay, North-western Australia. Stilt 37:11–13Google Scholar
  18. Rogers DI, Boyle A, Hassell C (2001) Wader counts on Kidneybean Claypan and adjacent Roebuck Plains, Northwestern Australia. Stilt 38:57–63Google Scholar
  19. Rogers DI, Piersma T, Lavaleye M et al (2003) Life along land’s edge. Wildlife on the shores of Roebuck Bay, Broome. Department of Conservation and Land Management, PerthGoogle Scholar
  20. van de Kam J, Ens BJ, Piersma T et al (2004) Shorebirds. An illustrated behavioural ecology. KNNV Publishers, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. van de Kam J, Battley PF, McCaffery BJ et al (2010) Invisible connections. Why migrating shorebirds need the Yellow Sea. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  22. Wade S (2004) Using spatial analysis to aid in managing Eighty-Mile Beach, Western Australia. Unpublished MS thesis, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, USA, 102pGoogle Scholar
  23. Wade S, Hickey R (2008) Mapping migratory wading bird feeding habitats using satellite imagery and field data, Eighty-Mile Beach, Western Australia. J Coast Res 24(3):759–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Hickey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grant B. Pearson
    • 2
  • Theunis Piersma
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeographyCentral Washington UniversityEllensburgUSA
  2. 2.Bennelongia Environmental ConsultantsJolimontAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Marine EcologyNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea ResearchDen Burg, TexelThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary StudiesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations