Advertisement

An Interactional View of Context in Business Processes

  • Udo Kannengiesser
  • Alexandra Totter
  • David Bonaldi
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 422)

Abstract

Incorporating context in business process descriptions has found increasing interest in the business process management (BPM) community. Most approaches are based on a notion of context as a static representation of relevant aspects of a process. This paper proposes that an understanding of context as a process that generates subjective views of context is more beneficial for business process applications. The paper develops a subject-oriented model for the alignment of the individual contextual views of workers and business process experts, as the basis of a framework for developing methods and tools for interactional context.

Keywords

Context Business Process Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process Modeling. Communications of the ACM 35, 75–90 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosemann, M., Recker, J.: Context-aware Process Design: Exploring the Extrinsic Drivers for Process Flexibility. In: 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Enginnering, Proceedings of Workshops and Doctoral Consortium (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saidani, O., Nurcan, S.: Towards context aware business process modelling. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS 2007), Electronic Ressource (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de la Vara, J.L., Ali, R., Dalpiaz, F., Sánchez, J., Giorgini, P.: Business Process Contextualisation via Context Analysis. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 471–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dey, A.K.: Understanding and Using Context. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 5(1), 4–7 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coutaz, J., et al.: Context is key. Communications of the ACM 48(3), 49–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wieland, M., et al.: Towards context-aware workflows. In: CAiSE (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosemann, M., Recker, J.C., Flender, C.: Contextualisation of business processes. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 3(1), 47–60 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chalmers, M.: A historical view of context. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13(3-4), 223–247 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fetzer, A. (ed.): Context and appropriateness: micro meets macro. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2007); Jucker, A.H. (ed.)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johns, G.: The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior. Academy of Managment Review 31(2), 386–408 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dourish, P.: What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8(1), 19–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ploesser, K., et al.: Learning from Context to Improve Business Processes. BP Trends 6(1), 1–7 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heravizadeh, M., Edmond, D.: Making workflows context-aware: a way to support knowledge-intensive tasks. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, vol. 79, pp. 79–88. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Wollongong (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pérez, E., Fortier, A., Rossi, G., Gordillo, S.: Rethinking context models. In: Meersman, R., Herrero, P., Dillon, T. (eds.) OTM 2009 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 5872, pp. 78–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Höök, K.: Comparing two approaches to context: realism and constructivism. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleischmann, A., et al.: Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleischmann, A., et al.: Subject-Oriented Modeling and Execution of Multi-Agent Business Processes. In: International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, Atlanta, GA (in press)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kouprie, M., Visser, F.S.: A Framework for Empathy in Design: Stepping into and out of the User’s Life. Journal of Engineering Design 20(5), 437–448 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Von Hippel, E., Katz, R.: Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits. Management Science 48, 821–833 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilkinson, A.: Empowerment: theory and practice. Personnel Review 27(1), 40–56 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spreitzer, G.: Toward the integration of two perspectives: A review of social-structural and psychological empowerment at work. In: Cooper, C., Barling, J. (eds.) The Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Udo Kannengiesser
    • 1
  • Alexandra Totter
    • 2
  • David Bonaldi
    • 2
  1. 1.Metasonic AGPfaffenhofenGermany
  2. 2.ByElement GmbHSchindellegiSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations