Evoking and Measuring Arousal in Game Settings
Serious games seem to be more effective if the participant feels more involved in the game. The participant should experience a high sense of presence which can be obtained by matching the level of excitement to the level of arousal a participant experiences. The level of arousal should be measured at runtime to make the game adaptive to the participant’s physiological state. In this paper an experiment is presented that has as main goal to see whether it is possible to evoke arousal during different types of computer games and to monitor the physiological response. Using three online games, participants reported different levels of stress and understanding between games. Furthermore, an increase of skin conductance was found as well as a decrease in heart rate for the most difficult to understand game.
Keywordsexperiment physiological measurements stress serious gaming virtual environment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bergeron, B.P.: Developing Serious Games. Charles River Media, Massachusetts (2006)Google Scholar
- 3.Brouwer, A.M., Neerincx, M.A., Kallen, V.L., van der Leer, L., ten Brinke, M.: EEG alpha asymmetry, heart rate variability and cortisol in response to virtual reality induced stress. Journal of Cybertherapy & Rehabilitation 4(1), 21–34 (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.Gerritsen, C., de Man, J., van der Meij, J.: Physiological and subjective response to injustice: the effects of unjust evaluations on physiological responses and subjective experiences. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Human Aspects in Ambient Intelligence, HAI 2013. IEEE Computer Society Press (2013) (to appear)Google Scholar
- 5.Hassett, J.: A primer of psychophysiology. WH Freeman, San Francisco (1978)Google Scholar
- 6.Kotsia, I., Patras, I., Fotopoulos, S.: Affective gaming: beyond using sensors. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing, ISCCSP 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Marsella, S., Gratch, J.: Modeling the influence of emotion on belief for virtual training simulations. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation, Orlando, FL (May 2002)Google Scholar
- 8.Michael, D.R., Chen, S.L.: Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform, Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Nacke, L.E., Drachen, A., Goebel, S.: Methods for Evaluating Gameplay Experience in a Serious Gaming Context. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport 9, 2 (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.Nacke, L.E., Kalyn, M., Lough, C., Mandryk, R.L.: Biofeedback Game Design: Using Direct and Indirect Physiological Control to Enhance Game Interaction. In: Proc. CHI 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Nacke, L.E., Mandryk, R.L.: Designing affective games with physiological input. Proceedings of Fun and Games (2011)Google Scholar
- 12.Nogueira, P.A., Rodrigues, R., Oliveira, E., Nacke, L.E.: Guided Emotional State Regulation: Understanding and Shaping Players’ Affective Experiences in Digital Games. In: Proceedings of the Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 51–57. AAAI (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. In: Biocca, F., Levy, M.R. (eds.) Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality, pp. 33–56. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1995)Google Scholar