Advertisement

Mapping Concepts for Learning

Chapter

Abstract

Graphic organizers such as concept mapping help instructors and students organize information visually. For instructors, concept maps help in the planning and presentation of course material through visual means to demonstrate how ideas, concepts, and topics are related. Concept maps can also offer students an alternative way to structure content, comprehend the relationships between topics, and present their understanding to others. This pilot case study demonstrates how an instructor of a graduate course uses concept maps to structure textbook material. Instead of using text notes and traditional outlines to highlight certain information in the textbook, the instructor uses concept maps to present the information visually. Student responses concerning the use of concept maps are also addressed in the case study. As a result, the instructor discovered that although concept maps were much more difficult to design initially, graduate students appeared to enjoy the option of reviewing a visual organizer of the key points in the textbook chapters than reading text-based notes. Concept maps accommodated the various learning styles of the students and helped the instructor organize course content.

Keywords

Concept mapping Graphic organizer Maps Visual learning 

References

  1. All, A. C., Huycke, L. I., & Fisher, M. J. (2003). Instructional tools for nursing education: Concept maps. Nursing Education Perspectives, 24(6), 311–317.Google Scholar
  2. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view(2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. The American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1248–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, P., & Pass, F. (2012). Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 827–832. doi:10.1002/acp.2882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal Educational Psychology, 106, 849–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daugherty, J. L., Custer, R. C., & Dixon, R. A. (2012). Mapping concepts for learning and assessment. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 10–14.Google Scholar
  8. Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 51–72Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, S., & Cooper, N. (2010). Mind mapping as a teaching resource. The Clinical Teacher, 7, 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, C. M., & Zha, S. (2013). Concept mapping: A critical thinking technique. Education, 134(2), 207–211.Google Scholar
  11. Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making Learning Visible: The Role of Concept Mapping in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311.Google Scholar
  12. Kamble, S. K., & Tembe, B. L. (2013). Teaching of the second law of thermodynamics: Evaluation of learners’ concept maps. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 20(2), 17–21.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, A.H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J, & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  15. Mayer, R.E. (2003). Learning and instruction.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  16. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (pp. 49–78). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42.Google Scholar
  18. O’Bannon, B., & Puckett, K. (2010). Preparing to use technology: A practical guide to curriculum integration. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Paxman, C. (2011). Map your way to speech success! Employing mind mapping as a speech preparation technique. Communication Teacher, 25(1), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rye, J., Landenberger, R., & Warner, T. A. (2013). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 22(3), 79–392. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9400-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silverman, L. K. (2002). Upside-down brilliance: The visual-spatial learner . Denver: DeLeon Pub.Google Scholar
  22. Wahidin, K.O., & Meerah, S. M. (2013). Concept mapping in chemistry lessons: Tools for inculcating thinking skills in chemistry learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 666–681.Google Scholar
  23. Yen, J., Lee, C., & Chen, I. (2012). The effects of image-based concept mapping on the learning outcomes and cognitive processes of mobile learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 307–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8535.2011.01189.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special EducationThe University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations