Towards the Next Generation of Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

  • Armando W. Colombo
  • Stamatis  Karnouskos
  • Thomas Bangemann
Chapter

Abstract

Intelligent networked embedded systems and technologies, ranging from components and software to Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) [1], are of increasing importance to the ICT supply industry, system integrators and all major mainstream sectors of the economy [9]. Development of new technologies for provisioning innovative services and products can lead to new business opportunities for the industry. Monitoring and Control are seen as key for achieving visions in several CPS dominated areas such as industrial automation systems, automotive electronics, telecommunication equipments, smart-grid, building controls, digitally driven smart cities, home automation, greener transport, water and wastewater management, medical and health infrastructures, online public services and many others [10]. This chapter introduces cloud-based industrial CPS and describes the first results of making it a reality for the Next Generation SOA-based SCADA/DCS systems. The reader can learn about the research, development and innovation work carried out by a set of experts collaborating under the umbrella of the IMC-AESOP project, for specifying, developing, implementing and demonstrating the major features of Intelligent Monitoring and Control Systems and the advantages of implementing them in different industrial process control environments.

References

  1. 1.
    acatech (2011) Cyber-physical systems: driving force for innovation in mobility, health, energy and production. Technical report, acatech—National Academy of Science and Engineering. http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/acatech_POSITION_CPS_Englisch_WEB.pdf
  2. 2.
    Badger L, Grance T, Patt-Corner R, Voas J (2012) Cloud computing synopsis and recommendations. Technical report, NIST Special Publication 800-146, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-146/sp800-146.pdf
  3. 3.
    Boyd A, Noller D, Peters P, Salkeld D, Thomasma T, Gifford C, Pike S, Smith A (2008) SOA in manufacturing—guidebook. Technical report, IBM Corporation, MESA International and Capgemini. ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/plm/pdif/MESA_SOAinManufacturingGuidebook.pdf
  4. 4.
    Broy M (2013) Cyber-physical systems: concepts, challenges and foundations. ARTEMIS magazine (14). http://www.artemis-ia.eu/publication/download/publication/877/file/ARTEMISIA_Magazine_14.pdf
  5. 5.
    Camarinha-Matos L, Afsarmanesh H (2008) Collaborative networks: reference modeling. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colombo AW, Karnouskos S (2009) Towards the factory of the future: a service-oriented cross-layer infrastructure. In: ICT shaping the world: a scientific view. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), Wiley, New York, pp 65–81Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colombo AW, Karnouskos S, Mendes JM (2010) Factory of the future: a service-oriented system of modular, dynamic reconfigurable and collaborative systems. In: Benyoucef L, Grabot B (eds) Artificial intelligence techniques for networked manufacturing enterprises management. Springer, London. ISBN 978-1-84996-118-9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Du R, Elbestawi MA, Wu SM (1995) Automated monitoring of manufacturing processes, Part 1: monitoring methods. J Eng Ind 117(2):121–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2803286
  9. 9.
    European Commission (2013a) Cyber-physical systems: uplifting Europe’s innovation capacity. http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/cyber-physical-systems-uplifting-europes-innovation-capacity
  10. 10.
    European Commission (2013b) ICT for societal challenges. Publications Office of the European Union—Luxembourg. doi:10.2759/4834, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=1944
  11. 11.
    Harrison R, Colombo AW (2005) Collaborative automation from rigid coupling towards dynamic reconfigurable production systems. In: 16th IFAC world congress, vol 16. doi:10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.01571
  12. 12.
    ITU (2005) ITU internet report 2005: the internet of things. Technical report, International Telecommunication Union (ITU)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jammes F, Smit H (2005) Service-oriented architectures for devices—the sirena view. In: 3rd IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, INDIN ’05, 2005, pp 140–147. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2005.1560366
  14. 14.
    Jamshidi M (ed) (2008) Systems of systems engineering: principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Technical report, acatech—National Academy of Science and Engineering. http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf
  16. 16.
    Karnouskos S, Colombo AW (2011) Architecting the next generation of service-based SCADA/DCS system of systems. In: 37th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society (IECON 2011), Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karnouskos S, Colombo A, Lastra J, Popescu C (2009) Towards the energy efficient future factory. In: 7th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, INDIN 2009, pp 367–371. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2009.5195832
  18. 18.
    Karnouskos S, Savio D, Spiess P, Guinard D, Trifa V, Baecker O (2010) Real world service interaction with enterprise systems in dynamic manufacturing environments. In: Artificial intelligence techniques for networked manufacturing enterprises management. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kennedy P, Bapat V, Kurchina P (2008) In pursuit of the perfect plant. Evolved Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee EA, Seshia SA (2011) Introduction to embedded systems: a cyber-physical systems approach, 1st edn. http://leeseshia.org
  21. 21.
    Maier MW (1998) Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Syst Eng 1(4):267–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marrón PJ, Karnouskos S, Minder D, Ollero A (eds) (2011) The emerging domain of cooperating objects. Springer, Berlin. http://www.springer.com/engineering/signals/book/978-3-642-16945-8
  23. 23.
    Mendes JM (2011) Engineering framework for service-oriented industrial automation. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto. http://paginas.fe.up.pt/niadr/NIADR/thesis_jmm_2011.03.21.pdf
  24. 24.
    Mendes JM, Bepperling A, Pinto J, Leitao P, Restivo F, Colombo AW (2009) Software methodologies for the engineering of service-oriented industrial automation: the continuum project. In: IEEE 37th annual computer software and applications conference 2013, vol 1, pp 452–459. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2009.66
  25. 25.
    DECISION (2008) Monitoring and control: today’s market, its evolution till 2020 and the impact of ICT on these. European Commission DG Information Society and Media. http://www.decision.eu/smart/SMART_9Oct_v2.pdf
  26. 26.
    Ribeiro L, Barata J, Colombo A, Jammes F (2008) A generic communication interface for dpws-based web services. In: 6th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, INDIN 2008, pp 762–767. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2008.4618204

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armando W. Colombo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stamatis  Karnouskos
    • 3
  • Thomas Bangemann
    • 4
  1. 1.Schneider ElectricMarktheidenfeldGermany
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences Emden/LeerEmdenGermany
  3. 3.SAPKarlsruheGermany
  4. 4.ifakMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations