Pectoral Muscle Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography

  • Florin C. Ghesu
  • Michael Wels
  • Anna Jerebko
  • Michael Sühling
  • Joachim Hornegger
  • B. Michael Kelm
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8331)

Abstract

Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and Mammography are increasingly supported by algorithms for automatic post-processing. The pectoral muscle, which dorsally delineates the breast tissue towards the chest wall, is an important anatomical structure for navigation. Along with the nipple and the skin, the pectoral muscle boundary is often used for reporting the location of breast lesions. It is visible in mediolateral oblique (MLO) views where it is well approximated by a straight line. Here, we propose two machine learning-based algorithms to robustly detect the pectoral muscle in MLO views from DBT and mammography. Embedded into the Marginal Space Learning framework, the algorithms involve the evaluation of multiple candidate boundaries in a hierarchical manner. To this end, we propose a novel method for candidate generation using a Hough-based approach. Experiments were performed on a set of 100 DBT volumes and 95 mammograms from different clinical cases. Our novel combined approach achieves competitive accuracy and robustness. In particular, for the DBT data, we achieve significantly lower deviation angle error and mean distance error than the standard approach. The proposed algorithms run within a few seconds.

References

  1. 1.
    Bajger, M., Ma, F., Bottema, M.J.: Minimum spanning trees and active contours for identification of the pectoral muscle in screening mammograms. In: Proceedings of the Digital Image Computing on Techniques and Applications, pp. 47–51 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cardoso, J.S., Domingues, I., Amaral, I., Moreira, I., Passarinho, P., Santa Comba, J., Correia, R., Cardoso, M.J.: Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on polar coordinates and the shortest path. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2010, 4781–4784 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrari, R.J., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L., Borges, R.A., Frere, A.F.: Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 232–245 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karssemeijer, N.: Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 365–378 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kinoshita, S.K., Azevedo-Marques, P.M., Pereira Jr, R., Rodrigues, J.A.H., Rangayyan, R.M.: Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms. J. Digit. Imaging 21, 37–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwok, S.M., Chandrasekhar, R., Attikiouzel, Y., Rickard, M.T.: Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 1129–1140 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma, F., Bajger, M., Slavotinek, J.P., Bottema, M.J.: Two graph theory based methods for identifying the pectoral muscle in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 40, 2592–2602 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sultana, A., Ciuc, M., Strungaru, R.: Detection of pectoral muscle in mammograms using a mean-shift segmentation approach. In: 8th International Conference on Communications, pp. 165–168 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tu, Z.: Probabilistic boosting-tree: learning discriminative models for classification, recognition, and clustering. In: Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1589–1596 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Schie, G., Tanner, C., Snoeren, P., Samulski, M., Leifland, K., Wallis, M.G., Karssemeijer, N.: Correlating locations in ipsilateral breast tomosynthesis views using an analytical hemispherical compression model. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 4715–4730 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wels, M., Kelm, B.M., Hammon, M., Jerebko, A., Sühling, M., Comaniciu, D.: Data-driven breast decompression and lesion mapping from digital breast tomosynthesis. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7510, pp. 438–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zheng, Y., Georgescu, B., Comaniciu, D.: Marginal space learning for efficient detection of 2D/3D anatomical structures in medical images. In: Prince, J.L., Pham, D.L., Myers, K.J. (eds.) IPMI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5636, pp. 411–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florin C. Ghesu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Wels
    • 1
  • Anna Jerebko
    • 3
  • Michael Sühling
    • 1
  • Joachim Hornegger
    • 2
  • B. Michael Kelm
    • 1
  1. 1.Siemens Corporate Technology, Imaging and Computer VisionErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Pattern Recognition Chair, Friedrich Alexander UniversityErlangenGermany
  3. 3.Siemens AG, HealthcareErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations