The Impasse of the Liberal Argument: Speculation on American Politics in the Late 1960s

  • David Zarefsky
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Argumentation Library book series (ARGA, volume 24)

Abstract

Arguments for liberal policies, strong during the early and middle 1960s, had reached an impasse by the end of the decade. They had developed an ad hominem character, leading to conclusions that their proponents could not accept. This progression is illustrated with respect to civil rights, the welfare state, and foreign policy. In each case, the liberal was stymied between the argument of the radical and that of the conservative. An approach to overcoming the impasse is sketched briefly, and a coda brings the article up to date in 2013.

This essay (without the coda) originally was presented at the 1983 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation at Alta, Utah. It is reprinted from Argument in Transition: Proceedings from the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation (D. Zarefsky, M.O. Sillars, & J. Rhodes, Ed.) (pp. 365–379), and is reprinted by permission of the National Communication Association.

Keywords

Liberalism U.S. politics—1960s Political argument Conservatism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alinsky, S. 1946. Reveille for radicals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, A., and H. Schuman. 1968. Racial attitudes in fifteen American cities: Supplemental studies for the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  3. Come All Ye Faithful. 1972. Newsweek, December 25, p. 22.Google Scholar
  4. Edelman, M. 1964. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  5. Farrell, T.B. 1982. Knowledge in time: Toward an extension of rhetorical form. In Advances in argumentation theory and research, ed. J.R. Cox and C.A. Willard, 123–153. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fogelson, R.M. 1971. Violence as protest: A study of riots and ghettos. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  7. Galbraith, J.K. 1958. The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Girvetz, H.K. 1963. The evolution of liberalism. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  9. Glazer, N., and D.P. Moynihan. 1963. Beyond the melting pot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Humphrey, H.H. 1968. Acceptance speech: Candidate for president. Vital Speeches of the Day, September 15, 34: 706–709.Google Scholar
  11. Humphrey’s Stand Criticized by Ford. 1966. New York Times, July 23, p. 9.Google Scholar
  12. Hyde, M.J. 1979. Paradox: The evolution of a figure of rhetoric. In Rhetoric 78: Proceedings of theory of rhetoric, an interdisciplinary conference, ed. R.L. Brown Jr. and M. Steinmann Jr., 201–225. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. Johnstone Jr., H.W. 1959. Philosophy and argument. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, D.R. 1968. G.O.P. links riots to Johnson policy. New York Times, June 3, pp. 1, 38.Google Scholar
  15. Kearns, D. 1976. Lyndon Johnson and the American dream. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  16. Moynihan, D.P. 1968. The professors and the poor. Commentary 46(August): 19–28.Google Scholar
  17. Moynihan, D.P. 1973. The politics of a guaranteed income. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Nixon, R.M. 1970. Inaugural address, January 20, 1969. In Public papers of the Presidents: Richard M. Nixon, 1969, 1–2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  19. Parmet, H.S. 1976. The Democrats: The years after FDR. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Riots Held Peril to Poverty Drive. 1967. New York Times, August 1, p. 17.Google Scholar
  21. Silberman, C.E. 1964. Crisis in black and white. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. Soskin, W.F. 1967. Riots, ghettos, and the “Negro revolt”. In Employment, race, and poverty, ed. A.M. Ross and H. Hill, 205–233. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
  23. Tomlinson, T.M. 1969. The development of a riot ideology among American Negroes. In Racial violence in the United States, ed. A.D. Grimshaw, 226–235. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Civil Rights Commission. 1967. A time to listen, a time to act: Voices from the ghettos of the nation’s cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  25. Weaver, R.M. 1953. The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
  26. White, T.H. 1970. The making of the president 1968. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  27. Zarefsky, D. 1977. President Johnson’s war on poverty: The rhetoric of three “establishment” movements. Communication Monographs 44: 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zarefsky, D. 1979. The Great Society as a rhetorical proposition. Quarterly Journal of Speech 65: 364–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zarefsky, D. 1983. Civil rights and civil conflict: Presidential communication in crisis. Central States Speech Journal 34: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Zarefsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations