Advertisement

Introduction to Clinical Research Concepts, Essential Characteristics of Clinical Research, Overview of Clinical Research Study Designs

  • Stephen P. GlasserEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses some of the central concepts related to clinical research such as sampling, hypothesis generation, and what is meant by the strength of scientific evidence. We also begin to discuss the different clinical research designs along with their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Keywords

Sampling Hypothesis Prospective and retrospective cohort design Case-control design Case cohort design Cross-sectional design Type I and type II error 

References

  1. 1.
    Parker Palmer. Accessed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Palmer
  2. 2.
    Vickers AJ. Michael Jordan won’t accept the null hypothesis: notes on interpreting high P values. Medscape. 2006;7:3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Null Logic of Hypothesis Testing. Accessed at http://www.shsu.edu/~icc_cmf/cj_787/research6.doc
  4. 4.
    Cited in The Null Logic of Hypothesis Testing. 1753–65. Accessed at http://www.shsu.edu/~icc_cmf/cj_787/research6.doc
  5. 5.
    Connolly HM, Crary JL, McGoon MD, Hensrud DD, Edwards BS, Edwards WD, et al. Valvular heart disease associated with fenfluramine-phentermine. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:581–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cited in Sartwell P and Nathanson N. Epidemiol Rev; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and recurrent events trial investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doll R. Cohort studies: history of the method II. Retrospective cohort studies. Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46:152–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freedman D. A researchers claim: 90% of medical research is wrong. Health Fam. 2010;2:1–2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyman J. Why most published research findings are false. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;2:e124.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CardioSource World News. Nov 2013:25–35.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1878–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pocock SJ, Elbourne DR. Randomized trials or observational tribulations. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1907–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations