Simulation of a Rubber Beam Interacting with a Two-Phase Flow in a Rolling Tank

Conference paper
Part of the Mathematics in Industry book series (MATHINDUSTRY, volume 19)


The aim of this paper is to present and validate a modeling framework that can be used for simulation of industrial applications involving fluid structure interaction with large deformations. Fluid structure interaction phenomena involving elastic structures frequently occur in industrial applications such as rubber bushings filled with oil, the filling of liquid in a paperboard package or a fiber suspension flowing through a paper machine. Simulations of such phenomena are challenging due to the strong coupling between the fluid and the elastic structure. In the literature, this coupling is often achieved with an Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian framework or with smooth particle hydrodynamics methods. In the present work, an immersed boundary method is used to couple a finite volume based Navier-Stokes solver with a finite element based structural mechanics solver for large deformations. The benchmark of an elastic rubber beam in a rolling tank partially filled with oil is simulated. The simulations are compared to experimental data as well as numerical simulations published in the literature. 2D simulations performed in the present work agree well with previously published data. Our 3D simulations capture effects neglected in the 2D case, showing excellent agreement with previously published experiments. The good agreement with experimental data shows that the developed framework is suitable for simulation of industrial applications involving fluid structure interaction. If the structure is made of a highly elastic material, e.g. rubber, the simulation framework must be able to handle the large deformations that may occur. Immersed boundary methods are well suited for such applications, since they can efficiently handle moving objects without the need of a body-fitted mesh. Combining them with a structural mechanics solver for large deformations allows complex fluid structure interaction problems to be studied.


Rubber Beam Fiber Suspension Flow Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) Complex Fluid Structure Interaction Problems Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported in part by the Sustainable Production Initiative and the Production Area of Advance at Chalmers. The support is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Hu, H., Patankar, N., Zhu, M.: Direct numerical simulation of fluid-solid systems using arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian technique. J. Comput. Phys. 169, 427–462 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Monaghan, J.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1703–1759 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummins, S., Rudman, M.: An sph projection method. J. Comput. Phys. 152, 584–607 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Onate, E., Idelsohn, S., Pin, F.D., Aubry, R.: The particle finite element method. An overview. Int. J. Comput. Methods 1, 267–307 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peskin, C.: Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J. Comput. Phys. 25, 220–252 (1977)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Majumdar, S., Iaccarino, G., Durbin, P.: Rans solvers with adaptive structured boundary non-conforming grids. Technical report, Center for Turbulence Research (2001). Annual Research BriefsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mark, A., van Wachem, B.: Derivation and validation of a novel implicit second-order accurate immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 6660–6680 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mark, A., Rundqvist, R., Edelvik, F.: Comparison between different immersed boundary conditions for simulation of complex fluid flows. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 7(3), 241–258 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mark, A., Svenning, E., Rundqvist, R., Edelvik, F., Glatt, E., Rief, S., Wiegmann, A., Fredlund, M., Lai, R., Martinsson, L., Nyman, U.: Microstructure simulation of early paper forming using immersed boundary methods. TAPPI J. 10(11), 23–30 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Svenning, E., Mark, A., Edelvik, F., Glatt, E., Rief, S., Wiegmann, A., Martinsson, L., Lai, R., Fredlund, M., Nyman, U.: Multiphase simulation of fiber suspension flows using immersed boundary methods. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 27, 184–191 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mark, A., Svenning, E., Edelvik, F.: An immersed boundary method for simulation of flow with heat transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 56, 424–435 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forster, C., Wall, W., Ramm, E.: Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 1278–1293 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Degroote, J., Bathe, K., Vierendeels, J.: Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 87, 793–801 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doormaal, J.V., Raithby, G.: Enhancements of the simple method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer. Heat Transf. 7, 147–163 (1984)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rhie, C., Chow, W.: Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J1 21, 1527–1532 (1983)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bonet, J., Wood, R.: Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Botia-Vera, E., Bulian, G., Lobovsky, L.: Three sph novel benchmark test cases for free surface flows. In: 5th ERCOFTAC SPHERIC Workshop on SPH Applications (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Degroote, J., Souto-Iglesias, A., van Paepegem, W., Annerel, S., Bruggeman, P., Vierendeels, J.: Partitioned simulation of the interaction between an elastic structure and free surface flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199, 2085–2098 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre, Chalmers Science ParkGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations