User-Centric Networking pp 269-288

Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)

| Cite as

Mobility Support in User-Centric Networks

  • Fikret Sivrikaya
  • Stefano Salsano
  • Marco Bonola
  • Marco Trenca
Chapter

Abstract

In this paper, an overview of challenges and requirements for mobility management in user-centric networks is given, and a new distributed and dynamic per-application mobility management solution is presented. After a brief summary of generic mobility management concepts, existing approaches from the distributed and peer-to-peer mobility management literature are introduced, along with their applicability or shortcomings in the UCN environment. Possible approaches to deal with the decentralized and highly dynamic nature of UCNs are also provided with a discussion and an introduction to potential future work.

Keywords

User-centric networks DMM Distributed mobility management Dynamic mobility management Decentralized mobility management Peer-to-peer 

References

  1. 1.
    Sofia R, Mendes P, Moreira W, Ribeiro A, Queiroz S, Carvalho L, Jamal T, Chama N, Junior A (2011) User-provided networks: living-examples, challenges, opportunities. SITI technical report SITI-TR-11-03, Mar 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akyildiz IF, Xie J, Mohanty S (2004) A survey of mobility management in next-generation all-IP-based wireless systems. IEEE Wirel Commun 11(4):16–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saha D, Mukherjee A, Misra IS, Chakraborty M (2004) Mobility support in IP: a survey of related protocols. IEEE Netw 18(6):34–40 Nov–Dec 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolla R, Repetto M (2013) A comprehensive tutorial for mobility management in data networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials PP(99):1.22Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan HA, Yokota H, Xie J, Seite P, Liu D (2011) Distributed and dynamic mobility management in mobile internet: current approaches and issues. J Commun 6(1):4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li T (2011) Recommendation for a routing architecture. RFC 6115, Feb 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins CE (1998) Mobile networking through mobile ip. IEEE Internet Comput 2(1):58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soliman H, Castelluccia C, ElMalki K, Bellier L (2008) Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6), RFC 5380 (Proposed standard) Oct 2008Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kong KS, Lee W, Han YH, Shin MK, You H (2008) Mobility management for all-ip mobile networks: mobile ipv6 versus proxy mobile ipv6. Wirel Commun 15(2):3645Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wakikawa R, Devarapalli V, Tsirtsis G, Ernst T, Nagami K (2009) Multiple care-of addresses registration. Internet-draft, work in progress, Oct 2009Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ernst T, Montavont N, Wakikawa R, Kulandinithi K, Ng C (2007) Motivations and scenarios for using multiple interfaces and global addresses. Internet draft, work in progress, July 2007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castelluccia C (2000) Hmipv6: a hierarchical mobile ipv6 proposal. SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev 4(1):4859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gundavelli S (2008) RFC 5213, Proxy mobile IPv6, Aug 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuntz R, Sudhakar D, Wakikawa R, Zhang L (2011) A summary of distributed mobility management. IETF internet draft, work in progress, May 2011Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan H (ed) (2013) Requirements for distributed mobility management. IETF internet draft, work in progress, Nov 2013Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IETF charter for working group DMM. https://ietf.org/wg/dmm/charter/
  17. 17.
    Bertin P, Bonjour S, Bonnin J (2009) Distributed or centralized mobility? IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2009), Nov 30–Dec 4 2009Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Condeixa T, Matos R, Matos A, Sargento A, Sofia R (2010) A new perspective on mobility management: scenarios and approaches. Second international ICST conference on mobile networks and management, Sept 2010Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nascimento A, Sofia RC, Condeixa T, Sargento S (2011) A characterization of mobile management in user-centric networks. 11th international conference on next generation wired/wireless advanced networking, New2AN 2011Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan AH (ed) (2011) Problem statement for distributed and dynamic mobility management. IETF internet draft, work in progress, Mar 2011Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Philippe B, Bonjour S, Bonnin J-M (2008) A distributed dynamic mobility management scheme designed for flat IP architectures. In: IEEE new technologies, mobility and security (NTMS’08)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chan HA (2010) Proxy mobile IP with distributed mobility anchors. In: IEEE GLOBECOM workshops (GC Wkshps)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu L, Zhijun Z, Tao L, Hui T (2010) Distributed mobility management based on flat network architecture. In: Proceedings of wireless internet conference (WICON’10) pp 1–6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu Y, Lee HCJ, Thing VLL (2003) A local mobility agent selection algorithm for mobile networks. IEEE international conference on communications, ICC’03, vol 2, pp 1074–1079, May 2003Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zuniga JC, Bernardos CJ, De La Oliva A, Melia T, Costa R, Reznik A (2013) Distributed mobility management: a standards landscape. IEEE Commun Mag 51(3):80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salsano S, Bonola M (2009) UPMT universal per-application mobility management using tunnels. IEEE GLOBECOM 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, 30 Nov–4 Dec 2009Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gustafsson E, Jonsson A (2003) Always best connected. IEEE Wirel Commun 10(1):49–55Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    David L-N, Balakrishnan H, Karger D (2002) Analysis of the evolution of peer-to-peer systems. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first annual symposium on principles of distributed computing, ACM 2002Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lua EK et al (2005) A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 7(1–4):72–93Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stoica I et al (2003) Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup protocol for internet applications. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 11(1):17–32Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ratnasamy S et al (2001) A scalable content-addressable network. In: ACM vol 31 No. 4Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rowstron A, Druschel P (2001) Pastry: scalable, decentralized object location, and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. Middleware 2001. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao BY et al (2004) Tapestry: A resilient global-scale overlay for service deployment. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 22(1):41–53Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Castro M et al (2002) Secure routing for structured peer-to-peer overlay networks. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 36(SI):299–314Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wallach DS (2003) A survey of peer-to-peer security issues. Software security theories and systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 42–57Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clarke I et al (2001) Freenet: a distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system. Designing privacy enhancing technologies. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Loo BT et al (2005) The case for a hybrid P2P search infrastructure. Peer-to-peer systems III. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–150Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Farha R et al (2006) Peer-to-peer mobility management for all-IP networks. In: IEEE international conference on communications, ICC’06, vol 5, pp 1946–1952, June 2006Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lo S-C (2007) Mobility management using P2P techniques in wireless networks. J Inf Sci Eng 23(2): 421–439Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gonen EK, Xu H, Pranav J (2005) A peer-to-peer architecture for mobile communications. 2nd international symposium on IEEE wireless communication systems 2005Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Peters S, Pardo DP, Zhou Q (2014) Mobility management in ULOOP. In: User-centric networking future perspectives. Springer LNSN Book, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    User-centric wireless local-loop (ULOOP). EU FP7 project. Available http://uloop.eu
  48. 48.
    Sofia R, Sargento A, Condeixa T (2014) Mobility estimation in the context of distributed mobility management. In: User-centric networking future perspectives. Springer LNSN Book, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fikret Sivrikaya
    • 1
  • Stefano Salsano
    • 2
  • Marco Bonola
    • 2
  • Marco Trenca
    • 2
  1. 1.DAI-LaborTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Dip. Ing. ElettronicaUniversità di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations