Numerals and Word Sequences
According to Spelke and Tsivkin numerals are a linguistic and cognitive bridge between two types of ‘core’ knowledge, that is, subitization of small quantities and approximate representation of large quantities. In this chapter, I go somewhat their way but I also introduce some a priori constraints on what could constitute a bridge. Such constraints are on the ‘design’ of a numeral system and on its use. The starting point is the consideration that numerals like ‘three’ (as well as names of days of the week like ‘Friday’) are nonstandard linguistic items. I propose that their peculiarity is primarily neither a syntactic nor a semantic peculiarity. It is instead in their morphology. Mastering numerals and names for days of the week is assigning them a certain nonstandard morphology, whereby any numeral is mandatorily a non-independent part of a longer sequence. It is hypothesized that this nonstandard morphology is associated with a nonstandard (at least for language) semantics, i.e. map semantics. In a sense, numerals are an artificial language encroached in natural language. The explanatory advantages of the account are discussed and contrasted with Spelke and Tsivkin ‘bridge’ account of the role of numerals in cognition.
KeywordsNumerals Maps Number cognition Public representations
Thanks to Luca Bonatti, Valentina Gliozzi, Pierre Jacob, Nirmalangshu Mukherji, Marco Panza, Achille Varzi, for useful comments on earlier versions of this chapter. And of course thanks to Kevin Mulligan, who got so many projects on the right track.
- Boyer CB (1991) A history of mathematics, 2nd edn (revised: Merzbach, UC). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bühler K (1934) Sprachtheorie. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
- Casati R, Varzi AC (1999) Parts and places. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Dehaene S (1997) The number sense. Oxford University , OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Frege G (1883) Grundlagen der Arithmetik, eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Nabu Press, BreslauGoogle Scholar
- Gallistel CR (1993) The organization of learning. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Husserl E (1891) Philosophie der Arithmetik. Pfeffer, HalleGoogle Scholar
- Karmiloff-Smith A (1992) Beyond modularity. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Mulligan K (1997) The essence of language: Wittgenstein’s builders and Buhler’s bricks. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2:193–215Google Scholar
- Simons P (1982) Number and manifold. In: Smith B (ed) Parts and moments. Studies in logic and formal ontology. Philosophia Verlag, München, pp. 160–199Google Scholar