Leveraging Social Media and IoT to Bootstrap Smart Environments

  • David N. Crowley
  • Edward Curry
  • John G. Breslin
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 546)


As we move towards an era of Smart Environments, mixed technological and social solutions must be examined to continue to allow users some control over their environment. Realisations of Smart Environments such as Smart Cities and Smart Buildings bring the promise of an intelligently managed space that maximises the requirements of the user while minimising resources. Our approach is to create lightweight Cyber Physical Social Systems that aim to include building occupants within the control loop to allow them some control over their environment. We motivate the need for citizen actuation in Building Management Systems due to the high cost of actuation systems. We define the concept of citizen actuation and outline an experiment that shows a reduction in average energy usage of 26 %. We outline a use case for citizen actuation in the Energy Management domain, propose architecture (a Cyber-Physical Social System) built on previous work in Energy Management with Twitter integration, use of Complex Event Processing (CEP), and discuss future research in this domain.


Resource Description Framework Link Data Energy Usage Smart City Social Media Platform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data-Design Issues. (2006)
  2. 2.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data—the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5, 1–22 (2009). doi: 10.4018/jswis.2009081901 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, D., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 13(1), 210–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breslin, J., Decker, S., Hauswirth, M., Hynes, G., Le-Phuoc, D., Passant, A., Polleres, A., Rabsch, C., Reynolds, V.: Integrating social networks and sensor networks. In: W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking. Barcelona (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breslin, J.G., Harth, A., Bojars, U., Decker, S.: Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pp. 500–514. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brickley, D., Miller, L.: FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. Namespace document. (2010)
  7. 7.
    Bull, R., Irvine, K.N., Fleming, P., Rieser, M.: Are people the problem or the solution? A critical look at the rise of the smart/intelligent building and the role of ict enabled engagement. In: European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE. ECEEE, Toulon/Hyres, France (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell, A.T., Eisenman, S.B., Lane, N.D., Miluzzo, E., Peterson, R.A., Lu, H.L.H., Zheng, X.Z.X., Musolesi, M., Fodor, K., Ahn, G.S.A.G.S.: The rise of people-centric sensing. IEEE Internet Comput. 12(4), 12–21 (2008). doi: 10.1109/MIC.2008.90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P.: Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 18(2), 65–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Compton, M., Barnaghi, P., Bermudez, L., García-Castro, R., Corcho, O., Cox, S., Graybeal, J., Hauswirth, M., Henson, C., Herzog, A., Huang, V., Janowicz, K., David Kelsey, W., Le Phuoc, D., Lefort, L., Leggieri, M., Neuhaus, H., Nikolov, A., Page, K., Passant, A., Sheth, A., Taylor, K.: The SSN Ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 17, 25–32 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2012.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cook, D., Das, S.: Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols and Applications. Wiley, London (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Costanza, E., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R.: Understanding domestic energy consumption through interactive visualisation: a field study. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 216–225. ACM, Pittsburgh, PA (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crowley, D.N., Corcoran, P., Young, K., Breslin, J.: Gamification of citizen sensing through mobile social reporting. In: IEEE International Games Innovation Conference 2012 (IGIC), pp. 1–5. Rochester, NY (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crowley, D.N., Curry, E., Breslin, J.G.: Closing the loop-from citizen sensing to citizen actuation. In: 7th IEEE International on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. Menlo Park, CA (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crowley, D.N., Passant, A., Breslin, J.G.: Short paper: annotating microblog posts with sensor data for emergency reporting applications. In: 4th International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks 2011 (SSN11), pp. 84–89. Bonn, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Curry, E.: System of systems information interoperability using a linked dataspace. In: IEEE 7th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SOSE 2012), pp. 101–106. Genova, Italy (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Curry, E., Hasan, S., ul Hassan, U., Herstand, M., O’Riain, S.: An entity-centric approach to green information systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011). Helsinki, Finland (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Curry, E., Hasan, S., O’Riain, S.: Enterprise energy management using a linked dataspace for energy intelligence. In: Second IFIP Conference on Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability. Pisa, Italy (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Curry, E., ODonnell, J., Corry, E., Hasan, S., Keane, M., ORiain, S.: Linking building data in the cloud: integrating cross-domain building data using linked data. Adv. Eng. Inform. 27(2), 206–219 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Demirbas, M., Bayir, M.A., Akcora, C.G., Yilmaz, Y.S., Ferhatosmanoglu, H.: Crowd-sourced sensing and collaboration using twitter. In: IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–9. IEEE, Sydney, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ. Commun. ACM 38(8), 30–32 (1995). doi: 10.1145/208344.208352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Augment, bootstrap communities, the Web: what next? In: CHI 98 Cconference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’98, pp. 15–16. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1145/286498.286506 (1998)
  23. 23.
    Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energ. Effi. 1(1), 79–104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goetz, T.: Harnessing the power of feedback loops. (2011)
  25. 25.
    Goodchild, M.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4), 1–15 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hasan, S., Curry, E., Banduk, M., O’Riain, S.: Toward situation awareness for the semantic sensor Web: complex event processing with dynamic linked data enrichment. In: 4th International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks 2011 (SSN11), pp. 69–81. Bonn, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herring, M.: A sea of sensors. (2010)
  28. 28.
    Jamshidi, M.: System-of-systems engineering-a definition. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). Hawaii, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boulos Kamel, M.N., Resch, B., Crowley, D.N., Breslin, J.G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., Pike, W.A., Jezierski, E., Chuang, K.Y.S.: Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor seb technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples. Int. J. Health Geographics 10(1), 67 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kwak, H., Lee, C.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’10, pp. 591–600. New York, NY (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lindenberg, S., Steg, L.: Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. J. Soc. Issues 63(1), 117–137 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parsons, D.J., Chatterton, J.C., Clements-Croome, D., Elmualim, A., Darby, H., Yearly, T., Davies, G.: Carbon brainprint case study: intelligent buildings. Techincal report, Centre for Environmental Risks and Futures. Cranfield University (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., Matsuo, Y.: Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW’10, pp. 851–860. ACM, New York, NY (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shaw, D.: Smart, social energy: can software change our energy habits?
  35. 35.
    Sheth, A.: Citizen sensing, social signals, and enriching human experience. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(4), 87–92 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snoonian, D.: Smart buildings. IEEE Spectr. 40(8), 18–23 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sullivan, B., Wood, C., Iliff, M., Bonney, R., Fink, D., Kelling, S.: eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 142(10), 2282–2292 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weiser, M., Gold, R., Brown, J.: The origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s. IBM Syst. J. 38(4), 693–696 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Welsh, M.: Sensor networks for the sciences. Commun. ACM 53(11), 36 (2010). doi: 10.1145/1839676.1839690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zengestrom, J.: Why some social network services work and others don’t—or: the case for object-centered sociality. (2005)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David N. Crowley
    • 1
  • Edward Curry
    • 1
  • John G. Breslin
    • 2
  1. 1.DERINUIGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNUIGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations