Trajectories of the Persecuted During the Second World War: Contribution to a Microhistory of the Holocaust

Chapter
Part of the Life Course Research and Social Policies book series (LCRS, volume 2)

Abstract

The application of prosopographical methods to the study of the Holocaust remains fairly uncommon, especially in France. In this chapter, we draw on a survey that allowed us to reconstruct “trajectories of persecution” through the Second World War, in order to discuss the difficulties and possible benefits of sequence analysis in this investigation on a cohort of about a thousand people identified as Jews and residing in Lens at the beginning of the War. Our attempts to “model” persecution and its effects on their trajectories raised a certain number of methodological issues, mostly dealing with the linearity of the causal schema implied by our approach: is it appropriate to reduce choices made under tragic circumstances to their social determinants? To conceptualize our data as “trajectories of persecution” seems to offer interesting prospects for overcoming some of these difficulties. By moving from a logic of properties to a logic of sequential states, and from a logic of causes to a logic of paths, we describe, order and interpret the plurality of trajectories, yet without abandoning quantification.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1990). A primer on sequence methods. Organization Science, 1(4), 275–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters. On theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anders, E., & Dubrovskis, J. (2003). Who died in the holocaust? Recovering names from official records. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 17(1), 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique (Le sens commun). Paris: Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2002). Le bal des célibataires. Crise de la société paysanne en Béarn. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  6. Browning, C. R. (2010). Remembering Survival: Inside a Nazi Slave Labor Camp. Chicago: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Croes, M. (2006). The holocaust in the Netherlands and the rate of jewish survival. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 20(3), 474–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desrosières, A. (2001). Entre réalisme métrologique et conventions d’équivalence : les ambiguïtés de la sociologie quantitative. Genèses, 43, 112–127.Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, E. (1894). Les règles de la méthode sociologique (rééd. 1988 ed., Champs). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  10. Fussell, E. (2005). Measuring the early adult life course in Mexico: An application of the entropy index. In R. MacMillan (Ed.)., The structure of the life course: Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated? (pp. 91–122). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Mueller, N. S., & Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(4), 1–37.Google Scholar
  12. Gross, M. (1994). Jewish rescue in holland and France during the second world war: Moral cognition and collective action. Social Forces, 73(2), 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klarsfeld, S. (2012). Mémorial de la déportation des Juifs de France: Paris, Fils et Filles des ­Déportés Juifs de France (FFDJF).Google Scholar
  14. Lemercier, C., & Zalc, C. (2008). Méthodes quantitatives pour l’historien. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  15. Lesnard, L. (2010). Cost setting in optimal matching to uncover contemporaneous socio-temporal patterns. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(3), 389–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macindoe, H., & Abbott, A. (2010). Sequence analysis and optimal matching techniques for social science data. In A. Bryman & M. A. Hardy (Ed.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 387406). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Mariot, N., & Zalc, C. (2010). Face à la persécution. 991 Juifs dans la guerre. Paris: Odile Jacob. Fondation pour la Mémoire de la Shoah.Google Scholar
  18. Mariot, N., & Zalc, C. (2012). Destins d’une communauté ou communauté de destins? Approche prosopographique. In T. Bruttmann, I. Ermakoff, N. Mariot & C. Zalc (Ed.), Pour une microhistoire de la Shoah (pp. 73–96). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  19. Mendelsohn, D. (2006). The lost: A search for six of six million. Scarborough: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  20. Mercklé, P. (2011). Sociologie des réseaux sociaux. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  21. Pollak, M. (1990). L’expérience concentrationnaire. Essai sur le maintien de l’identité sociale. Paris: Métailié.Google Scholar
  22. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed on 17 october 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Tammes, P. (2007). Jewish Immigrants in the Netherlands during the Nazi Occupation. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, XXXVII(4), 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Max WeberENS de Lyon, CNRSLyonFrance
  2. 2.Institut d’histoire moderne et contemporaineENS Ulm, CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations