Analyzing the Social Dynamics of Non-Player Characters

  • Magnus Johansson
  • Björn Strååt
  • Henrik Warpefelt
  • Harko Verhagen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8264)

Abstract

Much of the current research into artificial intelligence (AI) for computer games has been focused on simple actions performed by the characters in games (such as moving between points or shooting at a target, and other simple strategic actions), or on the overarching structure of the game story. However, we claim that these two separate approaches need to be bridged in order to fully realize the potential of enjoyment in computer games. As such, we have explored the middle ground between the individual action and the story – the type of behavior that occurs in a “scene” within the game. To this end we have established a new model for that can be used to discover in what ways a non-player character acts in ways that break the player’s feeling of immersion in the world.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartle, R.: Designing virtual worlds. New Riders Pub., Indianapolis (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, E., Cairns, P.: A Grounded Investigation of Game Immersion. In: CHI 2004, April 24-29, pp. 1–58113. ACM, Vienna (2004); 1-58113-703-6/04/0004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carley, K.M., Newell, A.: The nature of the social agent. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 19(4), 221–262 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng, K.: Behaviour, Realism and Immersion in Games. In: CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA, April 2-7 (2005), http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~pcairns/papers/Cheng.pdf
  5. 5.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costykian, G.: I have no words, I must design: towards a critical vocabulary for games. In: Mäyrä, F. (ed.) Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference. Tampere University Press, Tampere (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ermi, L., Mäyrä, F.: Fundamental Components of the Gameplay Experience. In: Castell, S., Jenson, J. (eds.) Worlds in Play: International Perspectives on Digital Games Research. Peter Lang Publishing (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hartley, T.P., Mehdi, Q.H.: In-game tactic adaptation for interactive computer games. In: 16th International Conference on Computer Games (CGAMES), pp. 41–49 (2011), doi:10.1109/CGAMES.2011.6000358Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johansson, M., Verhagen, H.: “Where is My Mind”- The Evolution of NPCs in Online Worlds. In: ICAART, vol. 2, pp. 359–364 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson, M., Eladhari, M., Verhagen, H.:  Complexity at the cost of control in game design? In: CGAT 2012, Bali, Indonesia (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juul, J.: The Game, the Player, the World: Looking for a Heart of Gameness. In: Copier, M., Raessens, J. (eds.) Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings, pp. 30–45. Utrecht University, Utrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lankoski, P.: Character design fundamentals for role-playing games. In: Montola, M., Stenros, J. (eds.) Beyond Role and Play - Tools, Toys, and Theory for Harnessing the Imagination, pp. 139–148 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lankoski, P., Björk, S.: Gameplay design patterns for believable non-player characters. In: Situated Play: Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference, pp. 416–423 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play – Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sweetser, P., Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Ozdowska, A.: GameFlow heuristics for designing and evaluating real-time strategy games. In: Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warpefelt, H., Strååt, B.: Breaking immersion by creating social unbelievabilty. In: Verhagen, H., Noriega, P., Balke, T., De Vos, M. (eds.) AISB 2013 Convention. Social Coordination: Principles, Artefacts and Theories (SOCIAL.PATH). The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magnus Johansson
    • 1
  • Björn Strååt
    • 1
  • Henrik Warpefelt
    • 1
  • Harko Verhagen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations