Dynamic Analysis of Inventory Policies for Improving Manufacturing Scheduling
Many researchers cite the automotive industry to study the application of Lean Manufacturing in reducing waste and improving productivity. However, in practice, the use of Lean Manufacturing techniques has spread into other industrial and service sectors, such as health and food, because of the benefits that this practice can achieve. Furthermore, different studies demonstrate that Lean Manufacturing combined with others techniques, such as simulation, produces benefits that impact on the key performance indicators of a company. Thus, in this study we analyze the combination of a simulation approach as System Dynamics on Lean Manufacturing practice in order to improve procurement policies and reduce the inventory in a livestock feed company.
KeywordsLean manufacturing System dynamics Inventory policies
This work was supported by the General Council of Superior Technological Education of Mexico (DGEST). Additionally, this work was sponsored by the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) and the Public Education Secretary (SEP) through PROMEP.
- Amin, M. A., & Karim, M. A. (2012). A systematic approach to evaluate the process improvement in lean manufacturing organizations. In G. Seliger (Ed.), Sustainable manufacturing (pp. 65–70). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bicheno, J. (2000). The lean toolbox (2nd ed.). Buckingham: PICSIE Books.Google Scholar
- Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Portland: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
- GröBler, A., & Schieritz, N. (2005). Of stocks, flows, agents and rules—strategic simulation in supply chain research. In H. Kotzab et al. (Eds.), Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management (pp. 445–460). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Morecroft, J., & Stewart, R. (2005). Explaining puzzling dynamics: A comparison the use of system dynamics and discrete event simulation. Proceedings of System Dynamics Society.Google Scholar
- Spear, S., & Bowen, K. H. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 97–106.Google Scholar
- Sandanayake, Y. G., Oduoza, C. F., & Proverbs, D. G. (2008). A systematic modelling and simulation approach for JIT performance optimization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 24, 735–743.Google Scholar
- Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Sweeter, A. (1999). A comparison of system dynamics (SD) and discrete event simulation (DES). Proceedings of System Dynamics Society.Google Scholar
- Scholl, H. (2001). Looking across the fence: comparing finding from SD modeling efforts with those other modeling techniques. International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Atlanta, GA: System Dynamics Society.Google Scholar
- Tako, A., & Robinson, S. (2009). Comparing model development in discrete event simulation and system dynamics. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference.Google Scholar
- Womack, J., Jones, D., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar