Client-Practitioner Interactions within Breast Care Services
- 2.3k Downloads
United Kingdom (UK) breast care services are delivered within one of two models. Clients presenting with breast symptoms (symptomatic) are assessed within a ‘one stop’ (all done at one hospital attendance) out-patient setting whilst asymptomatic clients currently aged 50–70 (screening) are invited for 3 yearly breast screening by the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). A proportion of the latter are recalled for further assessment should a mammographic abnormality be suspected (assessment clients). Many other health care systems around the world also offer these three breast care approaches (symptomatic, screening and assessment services), though the timeframe between screening invitations and the age range of clients varies within the screening services (see Chap. 8).
KeywordsCompression Force Breast Clinic Breast Screening Client Group Mammographic Abnormality
- 1.NHS Breast Screening Programme. Quality assurance guidelines for mammography: Including radiographic quality control. April 2006. ISBN 1 84463 028 5. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp63.html. Accessed 18 Aug 14.
- 2.National Cancer Peer Review Programme. Manual for cancer services: breast cancer measures version 1.1. 2014. http://www.cquins.nhs.uk/. Accessed 27 Aug 2014.
- 3.National Cancer Peer Review Programme. Report 2009/2010: Breast MDTs. http://www.cquins.nhs.uk/download.php?d=/resources/reports/NCAT_NCPR_Breast_Report_2010-11.pdf.
- 4.National Cancer Peer Review Programme. Report 2012/2013: Breast MDTs. http://www.cquins.nhs.uk/documents/resources/reports/2013/Breast%20NCPR%20Report%20September%202013.pdf.
- 5.Clark S, Reeves PJ. Women’s experiences of the breast cancer diagnostic process: A thematic evaluation of the literature; Recall & biopsy. Radiography. 2015;21(1):89–92.Google Scholar
- 8.Murphy F, Nightingale J, Robinson L, Mackay S, Seddon D, Hogg P. Compression force behaviours: an exploration of the beliefs and values influencing the application of breast compression during screening mammography. Radiography. 2014. Accepted and in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.05.009.
- 9.Nightingale J, Murphy F, Newton-Hughes A, Robinson L, Hogg P. Breast compression – an exploration of problem solving and decision making in mammography. Radiography. 2014. Ahead of print.Google Scholar
- 10.Poulos A, McLean D, Rickard M, Heard R. Breast compression in mammography; how much is enough? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2003;47(2):121–6.Google Scholar
- 11.Bai JY, He ZY, Dong JN, Yao GH, Chen HX, Li KA. Correlation of pain experience during mammography with factors of breast density and breast compressed thickness. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci). 2010;30(9):1062–6.Google Scholar
- 12.Poulos A. Having a mammogram: how does it feel? The Radiogr. 2004;51:129–31.Google Scholar
- 15.Miller D, Livingstone V, Herbison PG. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Database of Abstracts of Reviews and Effects (DARE). http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD002942/frame.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.
- 17.Clarke KA, Iphofen R. Breast cancer: a personal reflective account. Synergy. 2006:12–16.Google Scholar
- 29.Cancer Research UK. Cancer Statistics. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/breast/. Accessed 02 Oct 2013.
- 32.Hodgson L, Dixon A, Turley L. Vote of confidence. Imaging and Therapy Practice. 5–10 July 2013.Google Scholar
- 38.Costanza ME, Luckmann R, White MJ, Rosal MC, Cranos C, Reed G, Clark R, Sama S, Yood R. Design and methods for a randomized clinical trial comparing three outreach efforts to improve screening mammography adherence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(145):1472–6963. Abstract only.Google Scholar