Experimental Virtue: Perceptual Responsiveness and the Praxis of Scientific Observation

Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 366)

Abstract

In this chapter I will develop and defend an account of one particular scientific virtue, one not easily identifiable among traditional lists of the epistemic or the moral virtues, though components or preconditions of this virtue are found in most such accounts. Although my special focus here will be the manifestation of this virtue of scientific character in experimental/observational praxis, I will show how this virtue functions in both experimental and theoretical contexts, and is in fact critical to the excellent function of each as a guide and constraint for the other. While there is no English term that captures precisely the meaning of the virtue I shall emphasize, the nearest approximation would be perceptual responsiveness. The virtue of being perceptually responsive is conceptually complex, and will require precise definition and clarification.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bertsch McGrayne, Sharon. 1993. Nobel Prize women in science: Their lives, struggles and momentous discoveries. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar
  3. Creighton, Harriet, and Barbara McClintock. 1931. A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over in Zea Mays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 17: 492–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin, Charles. 1903. More letters of Charles Darwin: A record of his work in a series of Hitherto unpublished letters, Part One, ed. Francis Darwin and A.C. Seward. Accessed 1 Feb 2012 from Project Gutenberg at http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2739.
  5. ‘Espinasse, Margaret. 1956. Robert Hooke. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fairweather, Abrol, and Linda Zagzebski (eds.). 2001. Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fox Keller, Evelyn. 1983. A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Gunther, R.T. 1930a. Early science in Oxford, vol. VI.Google Scholar
  9. Gunther, R.T. 1930b. Early science in Oxford, vol. VII.Google Scholar
  10. Heisenberg, Werner. 1958. Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  11. Hooke, Robert. 1961 [1665]. Micrographia: Or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses with observations and inquiries thereupon. London: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund. 1982 [1913]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book. Trans. F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund. 1989 [1952]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Jardine, Lisa. 2004. The curious life of Robert Hooke: The man who measured London. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Kockelmans, Joseph. 1966. Phenomenology and physical science. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The visible and the invisible. Ed. C. Lefort, trans. A. Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Planck, Max. 1949. Scientific Autobiography. Trans. F. Gaynor. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  18. Vallor, Shannon. 2010. The pregnancy of the real: A phenomenological defense of experimental realism. Inquiry 52(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  19. Zagzebski, Linda T. 1996. Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Santa Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations