Anchoring Causal Connections in Physical Concepts

  • Mario Hubert
  • Roland Poellinger
Part of the The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective book series (PSEP, volume 5)


In their paper How Fundamental Physics Represents Causality Andreas Bartels and Daniel Wohlfarth maintain that there is place for causality in General Relativity. Their argument contains two steps: first they show that there are time-asymmetric models in General Relativity, then they claim to derive that two events are causally connected if and only if there is a time-asymmetric energy flow from one event to the other. In our comment we first give a short summary of their paper followed by a section introducing and pondering different conceptions of causation since Bartels and Wohlfarth don’t explicitly declare which notion of causation they build on in the paper. In order to analyze their argument in detail we formalize their crucial step in logical terms. This helps to pose the question whether their proposed derivation is not just a definition in a more precise way.


Causal Relation Causal Power World Line Causal Reasoning Causal Efficacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bartels, A., and D. Wohlfarth. 2013. How fundamental physics represents causality. In New directions in the philosophy of science, ed. M.C. Galavotti, et al. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Castagnino, M., and O. Lombardi. 2009. The global non-entropic arrow of time: From global geometrical asymmetry to local energy flow. Synthese 169(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castagnino, M., L. Lara, and O. Lombardi. 2003a. The cosmological origin of time asymmetry. Classical and Quantum Gravity 20(2): 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castagnino, M., L. Lara, and O. Lombardi. 2003b. The direction of time: From the global arrow to the local arrow. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42: 2487–2504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castagnino, M., O. Lombardi, and L. Lara. 2003c. The global arrow of time as a geometrical property of the universe. Foundations of Physics 33: 877–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curiel, E. 2000. The constraints general relativity places on physicalist accounts of causality. Theoria – Segunda Época 15(1): 33–58.Google Scholar
  7. Dowe, P. 2000. Physical causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths, D. 1999. Introduction to electrodynamics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Lam, V. 2005. Causation and space-time. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27(3–4): 465–478.Google Scholar
  10. Norton, J.D. 2007. Causation as folk science. In Causation, physics and the constitution of reality, ed. H. Price and R. Corry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rueger, A. 1998. Local theories of causation and the a posteriori identification of the causal relation. Erkenntnis 48: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Russell, B. 1912. On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
  13. Salmon, W. 1997. Causality and explanation: A reply to two critiques. Philosophy of Science 64: 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section de philosophie, Faculté des lettresUniversité de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Munich Center for Mathematical PhilosophyLudwig Maximilian University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations