Advertisement

STRATI 2013 pp 217-220 | Cite as

Limitations of the Astronomically Tuned Timescale: A Case Study from the Newark Basin

  • Lawrence H. TannerEmail author
  • Spencer G. Lucas
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Geology book series (SPRINGERGEOL)

Abstract

An astronomically tuned timescale has been applied successfully to most of the Cenozoic record, but remains problematic for much of the Mesozoic. We examine the reliability of the cyclostratigraphy of the Upper Triassic of the Newark basin and find that a strict application of an astronomic timescale is contradicted by biostratigraphy. The greatest weakness of the application appears to be the ability, or lack thereof, to verify the completeness of the Newark stratigraphic record.

Keywords

Cyclostratigraphy Newark Basin Norian Van Houten cycles McLaughlin cycles 

References

  1. Hinnov, L. A., & Hilgen, F. J. (2012). Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology. In F. M. Gradstein, J. G. Ogg, M. D. Schmitz, & G. M. Ogg (Eds.), The geologic time scale 2012. Vol. 1 (pp. 63–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hinnov, L. A., & Ogg, J. G. (2007). Cyclostratigraphy and the astronomical timescale. Stratigraphy,4, 239–251.Google Scholar
  3. Kent, D. V., & Olsen, P. E. (1999). Astronomically tuned geomagnetic polarity time scale for the late triassic. Journal Geophysical Research,104, 12831–12841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kozur, H., & Weems, R. E. (2005). Conchostracan evidence for a late rhaetian to early hettangian age for the CAMP volcanic event in the newark supergroup, and a sevatian (late Norian) age for the immediately underlying beds. Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften,B27, 21–51.Google Scholar
  5. Kozur, H., & Weems, R. E. (2007). Upper Triassic conchostracan biostratigraphy of the continental rift basins of eastern north America: Its importance for correlating newark supergroup events with the germanic basin and the international geologic timescale. New Mexico mus. Natural History Science Bulletin,41, 137–188.Google Scholar
  6. Kozur, H. W., Weems, R. E. (2010). The biostratigraphic importance of conchostracans in the continental Triassic of the northern hemisphere. In S. G., Lucas, (Eds.), The Triassic Timescale (Vol. 334, pp. 315–417). London: Geology Society, Special Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucas, S. G., Tanner, L. H., Kozur, H. W., Weems, R. E., & Heckert, A. B. (2012). The late triassic timescale: Age and correlation of the Carnian–Norian boundary. Earth Science Reviews,114, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Muttoni, G., Kent, D. V., Olsen, P. E., Di Stefano, P., Lowrie, W., Bernasconi, S. M., et al. (2004). Tethyan magnetostratigraphy from pizzo mondello (Sicily) and correlation to the late triassic newark astrochronological polarity time scale. Geological Society of America Bulletin,116, 1043–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ogg, J. G. (2012) Triassic. In F. M. Gradstein, J. G. Ogg, M. D. Schmitz & G. M. Ogg (Eds.) The geologic time scale 2012 (Vol. 2, pp. 681–730). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Olsen, P. E. (1984). Periodicity of lake-level cycles in the Late Triassic Lockatong Formation of the Newark Basin (Newark Supergroup, New Jersey and Pennsylvania). In A. Berger, J. Imbrie, J. Hays, G. Kukla, & B. Saltzman (Eds.), Milankovitch and climate (pp. 129–146). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  11. Olsen, P. E. (1986). A 40-million year lake record of Early Mesozoic orbital climate forcing. Science,234, 842–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Olsen, P. E., & Kent, D. V. (1996). Milankovitch climate forcing in the tropics of Pangea during the Late Triassic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,122, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsen, P. E., Schlische, R. W., Gore, P. J. W. (1989). Field guide to the tectonics, stratigraphy, sedimentology, and paleontology of the newark supergroup, eastern north America. International Geology Congress, p.T351 (Guidebooks for Field Trips).Google Scholar
  14. Olsen, P. E., Kent, D. V., Cornet, B., Witte, W. K., & Schlische, R. W. (1996). High-resolution stratigraphy of the newark rift basin (early mesozoic, eastern north America). Geological Society of America Bulletin,108, 40–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scholz, C. A., Moore, T. C, Jr, Hutchinson, D. R., Golmshtok, A Ja, Klitgord, K. D., & Kurotchkin, A. G. (1998). Comparative sequence stratigraphy of low-latitude versus high-latitude lacustrine rift basins: seismic data examples from the east African and baikal rifts. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,140, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tanner, L. H. (2010). Cyclostratigraphic record of the triassic: A critical examination. In S. G. Lucas (Ed.) The Triassic Timescale (Vol. 334, pp. 119–137), London: Geology Society Special Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesLe Moyne CollegeSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.New Mexico Museum of Natural HistoryAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations