The transperineal (translabial) approach to pelvic floor ultrasound allows for an easy, non-invasive method of imaging the three compartments of the pelvic floor. Furthermore, there is little distortion of anatomy and patient discomfort because the transducer is placed externally. Slings and synthetic meshes are easily visible as echogenic structures on ultrasound and transperineal imaging allows for good functional imaging assessment especially in patients with complex pelvic organ prolapse. This chapter covers the application of 2D pelvic floor ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse in routine clinical practice.
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Mesh Repair Pubic Symphysis Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Reconstructive Surgeon
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
(AVI 6776 kb)
(AVI 42039 kb)
(AVI 7939 kb)
(AVI 15550 kb)
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Weemholf M, et al. Effect of age on levator function and morphometry of levator hiatus in women with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinou C. Dynamics of female pelvic floor function using urodynamics, ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144 Suppl 1:S159–65.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar