Advertisement

Software Enabled Future Internet – Challenges in Orchestrating the Future Internet

  • Alex Galis
  • Javier Rubio-Loyola
  • Stuart Clayman
  • Lefteris Mamatas
  • Sławomir Kukliński
  • Joan Serrat
  • Theodore Zahariadis
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 125)

Abstract

This position paper presents SoftINTERNET an initiative for a service-aware and management-aware network control infrastructure for heterogeneous networks (i.e., wired and wireless) that uses software driven features for the elaboration, development, and validation of networking concepts. The proposed infrastructure aims to optimally integrate the connectivity and management layers. It operates across multiple network environments and on top of private and public network clouds utilising fixed and mobile virtual resources, OpenFlow enabled network devices like switches and routers, and networks of Smart Objects. In this position paper, we discuss the motivation, architecture and research challenges for such a promising concept.

Keywords

Software Defined Networks Software Enabled Networks Virtualization Orchestration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ETSI. Software-aware and Management-aware SDN” initiative initiated and lead by members of the SoftINTERNET consortium (e.g. 3rd ETSI Future Networks Workshop 9-11 April 2013 http://www.etsi.org/news-events/news/617-2013-fnt-intro
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Luo, T., Tan, H.P., Quek, T.Q.S.: Sensor OpenFlow: Enabling Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Letters 16(11), 1896–1899 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Science Foundation, Networking Technology and Systems, NeTS (2008), http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08524/nsf08524.htm
  5. 5.
    National Science Foundation. Network Science and Engineering (NetSE) (2010), http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503325
  6. 6.
    BNN Technologies. GENI: Exploring networks of the future (2010) http://www.geni.net/
  7. 7.
    Stanford Clean Slate, http://cleanslate.stanford.edu/
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Jutand, F.: National Future Internet Initiatives - GRIF (France) (2010), http://www.francenumerique2012.fr/
  10. 10.
    AETIC, Internet del Futuro (2008), http://www.idi.aetic.es/esInternet/
  11. 11.
    Koponen, T., et al.: A Data-Oriented Network Architecture. In: SIGCOMM 2007, New York, USA, pp. 181–192 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gritter, M., Cheriton, D.: TRIAD: A New Next-Generation Internet Architecture (2000), http://www-dsg.stanford.edu/triad,July
  13. 13.
    EU FP7 4WARD project website, http://www.4ward-project.eu
  14. 14.
    EU FP7 SAIL project website, http://www.sail-project.eu
  15. 15.
    NSF FIA NEBULA project website, http://nebula.cis.upenn.edu
  16. 16.
    NSF FIA eXpressive Internet Architecture project website, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~xia
  17. 17.
    EU FP7 PURSUIT project website, www.fp7-pursuit.eu
  18. 18.
    EU FP7 PSIRP project website, http://www.psirp.org
  19. 19.
    EU FP7 FI-WARE project website, http://www.fi-ware.eu
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Harai, H.: AKARI Architecture Design Project in Japan (August 2008), http://akari-project.nict.go.jp/eng/document/asiafi-seminar-harai-080826.pdf; Wetherall, D., Tennenhouse, D.: The ACTIVE IP Options. In: Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGOPS European Workshop (September 1996)
  22. 22.
    Merwe, V., Leslie, I.M.: “Switchlets and Dynamic Virtual ATM Networks. In: Proc Integrated Network Management V (May 1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chan, M.C., Huard, J.F., Lazar, A.A., Lim, K.S.: On Realizing a Broadband Kernel for Multimedia Networks. In: Ventre, G., Danthine, A., Domingo-Pascual, J. (eds.) COST-237 1996. LNCS, vol. 1185, pp. 56–74. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson, L.: NodeOS Interface Specification., Technical Report, Active Networks NodeOS Working Group (February 2, 1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campbell, A.T., De Meer, H.G., Kounavis, M.E., Miki, K., Vicente, J.B., Villela, D.: The Genesis Kernel: A Virtual Network Operating System for Spawning Network Architectures. In: Second International Conference on Open Architectures and Network Programming (OPENARCH), New York (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Da Silva, S., Florissi, D., Yemini, Y.: NetScript: A Language-Based Approach to Active Networks. Technical Report, Computer Science Dept., Columbia University (January 27, 1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Merwe, V., Rooney, J.E., Leslie, S.: I.M.: Crosby, S.A.: The Tempest - A Practical Framework for Network Programmability. IEEE Network (November 1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yemini, Y., Da Silva, S.: Towards Programmable Networks. In: IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, L’Aquila, Italy (October 1996)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    EU RESERVOIR project web site, http://62.149.240.97/
  30. 30.
    McKeown et al: OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks (March 2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sherwood, et al: FlowVisor: a network virtualization layer (October 2009) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Open Networking Foundation web site, http://www.opennetworkingfoundation.org
  33. 33.
    Gude et al.: NOX: towards an operating system for networks Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yak, K.-K., et al.: OpenRoads: Empowering Research in Mobile NetworksGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    EU FP7 OFELIA project website, http://www.fp7-ofelia.eu
  36. 36.
    EU FP7 OpenLab project web site, http://www.ict-openlab.eu
  37. 37.
    EU FP7 SPARC project website, http://www.fp7-sparc.eu
  38. 38.
    EU FP7 SAIL project website, http://www.sail-project.eu
  39. 39.
    EU FP7 FI-WARE project web site, http://www.fi-ware.eu
  40. 40.
    IEEE, 802.1Qbg – Edge Virtual Bridging, http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1bg.html
  41. 41.
    Rochwerger, B., Breitgand, D., Epstein, A., Hadas, D., Loy, I., Nagin, K., Tordsson, J., Ragusa, C., Villari, M., Clayman, S., Levy, E., Maraschini, A., Massonet, P., Muñoz, H., Toffetti, G.: Reservoir - When One Cloud Is Not Enough. IEEE Computer 44(3), 44–51 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sridharan, M., Duda, K., Ganga, I., Greenberg, A., Lin, G., Pearson, M., Thaler, P., Tumuluri, C., Venkataramiah, N., Wang, Y.: NVGRE: Network Virtualisation using Generic Routing Encapsulation, IEFT Draft, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-virtualization-nvgre-00
  43. 43.
    Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger, L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., Wright, C.: VXLAN: A Framework for Overlaying Virtualised Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks., IETF Draft, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-00
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
    Christensen, J.H.: Using RESTful web-services and cloud computing to create next generation mobile applications. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN Conference Companion on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), pp. 627–634 (October 2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu, L., Moulic, R., Shea, D.: Cloud Service Portal for Mobile Device Management. In: Proceedings of IEEE 7th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), p. 474 (January 2011)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bonomi, F., et al.: Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Galis, A., Denazis, S., Brou, C., Klein, C. (eds.): ’Programmable Networks for IP Service Deployment. Artech House Books (June 2004), http://www.artechhouse.com/Default.asp?Frame=Book.asp&Book=1-58053-745-6 ISBN 1-58053-745-6
  50. 50.
    Rubio-Loyola, J., Galis, A., Astorga, A., Serrat, J., Lefevre, L., Fischer, A., Paler, A., de Meer, H.: Scalable Service Deployment on Software Defined Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine/ Network and Service Management Series (December 2011), http://dl.comsoc.org/ci1/ ISSN: 0163-6804
  51. 51.
    Chapman, C., Emmerich, E., Marquez, F.G., Clayman, S., Galis, A.: Software Architecture Definition for On-demand Cloud Provisioning. Springer Journal on Cluster Computing (May 2011), http://www.editorialmanager.com/clus/, www.springerlink.com/content/m31np5112525l67v, doi:10.1007/s10586-011-0152-0
  52. 52.
    Galis, A., Plattner, B., Smith, J.M., Denazis, S., Moeller, E., Guo, H., Serrat, J., Laarhuis, J., Karetsos, G.T., Todd, C.: A flexible IP active networks architecture. In: Yasuda, H. (ed.) IWAN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1942, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Clayman, S., Clegg, R., Mamatas, L., Pavlou, G., Galis, A.: Monitoring, Aggregation and Filtering for Efficient Management of Virtual Networks. In: IEEE CNSM mini-conference 2011: 7th International Conference on Network and Service Management, Paris, France (October 2011), www.cnsm2011.org/, http://cnsm.loria.fr/
  54. 54.
    Clegg, G., Clayman, R., Pavlou, S., Mamatas, G., Galis, L., On, A.: the Selection of management and monitoring nodes in dynamic networks, March 2012. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2012), http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TC.2012.67 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Matsubara, D., Egawa, T., Nishinaga, N., Kafle, V.P., Shin, M.K., Galis, A.: Toward Future Networks: A Viewpoint from ITU-T. IEEE Communications Magazine 51(3), 112–118 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) – ETSI Industry Group started in (January 2013), http://portal.etsi.org/portal/server.pt/community/NFV/367&whitepaper&whitepaper, http://portal.etsi.org/NFV/NFV_White_Paper.pdf

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Galis
    • 1
  • Javier Rubio-Loyola
    • 2
  • Stuart Clayman
    • 1
  • Lefteris Mamatas
    • 1
  • Sławomir Kukliński
    • 3
  • Joan Serrat
    • 4
  • Theodore Zahariadis
    • 5
  1. 1.University College LondonU.K.
  2. 2.Cinvestav TamaulipasMexico
  3. 3.Orange LabsPoland
  4. 4.Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaSpain
  5. 5.SynelixisGreece

Personalised recommendations