Qualitative Learning Outcome through Computer Assisted Instructions

  • Tamali Bhattacharyya
  • Rajendra Prasath
  • Bani Bhattacharya
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8284)

Abstract

The Qualitative Outcome of Learning (QOL) measures the level of attainment in learning efforts through Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. Modern Computer Assisted Instructions (CAI) employ interactive tools that illustrate a concept using not only visual aids like animation, sound, etc but also stimulating the cognitive level of learners. In this work, we attempted to evaluate the QOL of learners at the age of 14 years. The learners are challenged to test their understanding in lessons related to specific topics, rather than just knowing the content. Each topic content is based on SOLO taxonomy and set to test the understanding level of learners with increasing complexity in that topic. Lessons are planned from simple to complex structured responses involving Relational and abstract thinking and the level at which the learner is operating is assessed. Our objective is to evaluate the QOL using CAI tools whether they can uplift “surface” learners towards “deep” learning. We used Shikshak - an intelligent tutoring system and a simple CD based approach, through which learners appear to promote active cognitive learning and assessed the growth or decline of competence of learners with the help of CAI according to SOLO taxonomy. The effects of QOL by the CAI tools have been measured in comparisons with printed lessons based learning approach and found that CAI stimulates “deep” learning.

Keywords

Qualitative Outcome of Learning Computer Aided Instructions SOLO Taxonomy Deep Learning Shikshak - Intelligent Tutoring System 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Biggs, J.: Assessing for learning: Some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 41, 1–17 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biggs, J.: Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32, 347–364 (1996), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biggs, J.B.: Australian Council for Educational Research Limited. learning Process Questionnaire MANUAL - Student Approaches to learning and studying (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biggs, J.B.: The Process of Learning, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Sydney (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biggs, J.B.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the student does. Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biggs, J.B., Collis, K.: Evaluating the quality of learning: The S. O.L.O. Taxonomy. Academic Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borkowski, J.G., Carr, M., Pressley, M.: “spontaneous” strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence 11(1), 61–75 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharya, T., Bhowmick, P., Basu, A., Sarkar, S.: Shikshak: An intelligent tutoring system authoring tool for rural education. In: International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD 2007, pp. 1–10 (December 2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marton, F., Saljo, R.: On qualitative differences in learning - 1: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roy, D., Sarkar, S., Ghose, S.: Learning material annotation for flexible tutoring system. Journal of Intelligent Systems 16, 293–305 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamali Bhattacharyya
    • 1
  • Rajendra Prasath
    • 2
  • Bani Bhattacharya
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Educational TechnologyIndian Institute of Technology, KharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology, KharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations