Performance Evaluation of Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Design of Belt Pulley System

  • Pandurengan Sabarinath
  • M. R. Thansekhar
  • R. Saravanan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8297)


The present scenario in the design of machine elements includes the minimization of weight of the individual components in order to reduce the overall weight of the machine elements. It saves both cost and energy involved. Belts are used to transmit power from one shaft to another by means of pulleys which rotate at the same speed or different speeds. Generally, the weight of pulley acts on the shaft and bearings. In the present study, minimization of weight of a belt pulley system has been investigated. Particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) is used to solve the above mentioned problem subjected to a set of practical constraints and it is compared with the results obtained by Differential Evolution Algorithm (DEA). Our results indicate that PSO approach handles our problem efficiently in terms of precision and convergence and it outperforms the results presented in the literature.


Optimal Design Belt pulley system Particle swarm optimization algorithm 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Deb, K.: Optimization for Engineering Design: algorithms and examples. Prentice Hall, New Delhi (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhandari, V.B.: Design of Machine Elements. McGraw Hill Education (India) Pvt. Ltd., New York (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rao, S.S.: Engineering optimization. New Age International Publishers (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reddy, Y.V.M.: Optimum Design of Belt Drive using Geometric Programming. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das, A.K., Pratihar, D.K.: Optimal Design of Machine Elements using a Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Institution of Engineers 83, 97–104 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karaboga, D.: An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report-TR06. Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basturk, B., Karaboga, D.: An artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for numeric function optimization. In: IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorigo, M., Stutzle, T.: Ant colony optimization. MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization: introduction and recent trends. Physics of Life Reviews 2, 353–373 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 194, pp. 3902–3933 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahrari, A., Atai, A.A.: Grenade explosion method - A novel tool for optimization of multimodal functions. Applied Soft Computing 10(4), 1132–1140 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy, V., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clerc, M.: Particle swarm optimization. ISTE Publishing Company (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clerc, M., Kennedy, J.F.: The particle swarm: Explosion, stability and convergence in a multidimensional Complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 58–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jerald, J., Asokan, P., Prabaharan, G., Saravanan, R.: Scheduling optimisation of flexible manufacturing systems using particle swarm optimisation algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25, 964–971 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Noorul Haq, A., Sivakumar, K., Saravanan, R., Karthikeyan, K.: Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimal machining allocation of clutch assembly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 27, 865–869 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saravanan, R., Siva Sankar, R., Asokan, P., Vijayakumar, K., Prabhaharan, G.: Optimization of cutting conditions during continuous finished profile machining using non-traditional techniques. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 26, 30–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deb, K.: An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithm. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 186, 311–338 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11, 341–359 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gnanambal, K., Babulal, C.K.: Maximum loadability limit of power system using hybrid differential evolution with particle swarm optimization. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 43, 150–155 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pandurengan Sabarinath
    • 1
  • M. R. Thansekhar
    • 1
  • R. Saravanan
    • 2
  1. 1.K.L.N College of EngineeringIndia
  2. 2.JCT College of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations