Towards an Egalitarian Pedagogy for the Millennial Generation: A Reflection

  • Sandeep Purao


This is a first person account and a reflection. The chapter presents a preliminary outline of what I call an egalitarian pedagogy for the millennial generation (emulating Freire). The attempt is based on an ongoing reflection on the practice of teaching organizational informatics for about two decades, first in a business school and then, in an information school. I describe how I arrived at this position, and outline some underlying principles for such a pedagogy. The chapter points to possibilities for repurposing existing and emerging teaching practices towards this pedagogical perspective, and concludes by positioning the egalitarian perspective as a viable alternative.


  1. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cameron, B., & Purao, S. (2010). Enterprise integration: An experiential learning model. IS Education Journal, 8(38, July).Google Scholar
  3. Draves, W. A., & Coates, J. (2007). Nine shift: Work, life and education in the 21st century. River Falls: LERN Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Henderson, M. (2013). Move over, millennials: Why 20-somethings should fear teens. Forbes, 31 Jul 2013. Accessed 30 Sept 2013
  5. Junco, R., & Mastrodicasa, J. (2007). Connecting to the net. generation: What higher education professionals need to know about today’s students. Washington, DC: NASPA.Google Scholar
  6. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19, 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mathiassen, L., & Purao, S. (2002). Educating reflective systems developers. Information Systems Journal, 12(2, April), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nilsen, H., & Purao, S. (2005). Balancing objectivist and constructivist pedagogies for teaching emerging technologies: Evidence from a Scandinavian case study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(3), 281–292.Google Scholar
  11. Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  12. Purao, S. (1999). Hyper-link teaching and intelligent slides: Complementary strategies to foster active learning. Journal of Education for MIS, 5(1), 63–78.Google Scholar
  13. Sanzen, P. L. (1994). Egalitarianism and pedagogy. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 5(1), 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ISTPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations