Entity-from-Relationship Modelling

  • Claudio Masolo
  • Alessandro Artale
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8249)

Abstract

We investigate the problem of the (re-)identification of new entities emerging from the presence of relationships in a conceptual schema. While the general practice is to reify the relation and thus individuating as many individuals as many tuples in the original relation, we propose here different identification methods based on the possibility of grouping the tuples according to some predefined criteria. The proposed modelling mechanism is general enough to capture in a uniform way also the case where wholes emerge from their components or constituents.

Keywords

conceptual modelling constructs ontological foundations formal semantics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Artale, A., Guarino, N., Keet, C.M.: Formalising temporal constraints on part-whole relations. In: Brewka, G., Lang, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2008), pp. 673–683. AAAI Press (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artale, A., Franconi, E.: Foundations of temporal conceptual data models. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 10–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Artale, A., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Zakharyaschev, M.: Complexity of reasoning over temporal data models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 174–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casati, R., Varzi, A.: Parts and Places. The Structure of Spatial Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Fraassen, B.C.: Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibbard, A.: Natural property rights. Nous 10, 77–88 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. Phd, University of Twente (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta, A.: The Logic of Common Nouns: an investigation in quantified modal logic. Phd thesis, Yale University (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halpin, T., Morgan, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensen, C.S., Snodgrass, R.T.: Temporal data management. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 111(1), 36–44 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loebe, F.: An Analysis of Roles. Toward Ontology-Based Modelling. Master’s thesis, University of Leipzig (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masolo, C.: Levels for conceptual modeling. In: De Troyer, O., Bauzer Medeiros, C., Billen, R., Hallot, P., Simitsis, A., Van Mingroot, H. (eds.) ER 2011 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 6999, pp. 173–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Kitamura, Y., Kozaki, K., Mizoguchi, R.: The counting problem in the light of role kinds. In: Davis, E., Doherty, P., Erdem, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning. AAAI Press (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masolo, C.: Understanding ontological levels. In: Lin, F., Sattler, U. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), pp. 258–268. AAAI Press (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mizoguchi, R., Sunagawa, E., Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y.: A model of roles within an ontology development tool: Hozo. J. of Applied Ontology 2(2), 159–179 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spaccapietra, S., Parent, C., Zimanyi, E.: Conceptual Modeling for Traditional and Spatio-Temporal Applications—The MADS Approach. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steimann, F.: On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modelling. Data and Knowledge Engineering 35, 83–106 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Welty, C., Andersen, W.: Towards ontoclean 2.0: A framework for rigidity. Journal of Applied Ontology 1(1), 107–116 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wieringa, R., de Jonge, W., Spruit, P.: Using dynamic classe and role classe to model object migration. Theory and Practice of Object Systems 1(1), 31–83 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Masolo
    • 1
  • Alessandro Artale
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory for Applied Ontology, ISTC-CNRTrentoItaly
  2. 2.KRDB Research CentreFree University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations