Synopsis of Pathophysiology in Nuclear Medicine pp 273-289 | Cite as
Central Nervous System
Abstract
The central nervous system consists of the brain and the spinal cord. The major anatomical divisions of the brain are the cerebrum and the cerebellum, together weighing about 1,400 g in the adult. The cells in the brain are classified as glia or neurons. About 10,000 different types of neurons totaling approximately 100 billion neurons comprise the human brain. The cerebral cortex consists of two hemispheres connected by a large mass of white matter called the corpus callosum. The surface layer of each hemisphere is folded into gyri comprising the gray matter. The brain is divided into functional areas called the frontal lobe (anterior to the central sulcus) and the parietal lobe (posterior to this sulcus). The occipital lobe lies below the parieto-occipital sulcus, and the temporal lobe is situated below the lateral sulcus (Figs. 12.1 and 12.2). Knowledge of cross-sectional anatomy of the brain is a prerequisite for proper interpretation of brain imaging since tomographic imaging is the rule in current functional neuroimaging.
Keywords
Multiple System Atrophy Brain Death Essential Tremor Vascular Dementia Metastatic Brain TumorReferences
- 1.Ropper AH, Brown RJ (eds) (2005) Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 2.von Strauss E, Viitanen M, De Ronchi D, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L (1999) Aging and the occurrence of dementia: findings from a population-based cohort with a large sample of nonagenarians. Arch Neurol 56:587–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Mesulam MM, Johnson N, Grujic Z, Weintraub S (1997) Apolipoprotein genotypes in primary progressive aphasia. Neurology 49:51–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Westbury C, Dan B (1997) Primary progressive aphasia: a review of 112 cases. Brain Lang 60:381–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brodley WG, Kortman KE, Burgoyne B (1986) Flowing cerebrospinal fluid in normal and hydrocephalic states. Appearance on MRI imaging. Radiology 159:611Google Scholar
- 6.Shih WJ, Ryo UY (1988) Radionuclide brain imaging. In: Yeh SD, Chen DC (eds) Nuclear medicine update. Chinese American Society of Nuclear Medicine. The Society of Nuclear Medicine, ROC, Taipei, pp 246–271Google Scholar
- 7.Kawaguchi S, Lio M, Murata H et al (1986) Comparative study of NPH by RN cisternography and CT scan in aged. J Nucl Med 27:84Google Scholar
- 8.Silbersteib EB (1983) Brain scintigraphy in the diagnosis of the sequelae of head trauma. Semin Nucl Med 13:153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Saha GB, MacIntyre WJ, Go RT (1994) Radiopharmaceuticals for brain imaging. Semin Nucl Med 24:324–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lassen NA, Blasberg RG (1988) Technetium-99m-d, l-HM-PAO, the development of a new class of 99mTc-labeled tracers: an overview. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 8:S1–S51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Walovitch RC, Hill TC, Garrity ST, Cheesman EH, Burgess BA et al (1989) Characterization of technetium-99m-L, L-ECD for brain perfusion imaging, part 1: pharmacology of technetium-99m ECD in nonhuman primates. J Nucl Med 30:1892–1901PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lassen NA (1985) Cerebral blood flow tomography with xenon-133. Semin Nucl Med 15:347–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mountz JM, Raymond PA, McKeever PE, Modell JG, Hood TW et al (1989) Specific localization of thallium-201 in recurrent high grade astrocytoma by microautoradiography. Cancer Res 49:4053–4056PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.O’Tuama LA, Treves ST, Larar JN (1993) Thallium-201 versus technetium-99m-MIBI SPECT in evaluation of childhood brain tumors: a within-subject comparison. J Nucl Med 34:1045–1051PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Conti PS (1995) Introduction to imaging brain tumor metabolism with positron emission tomography (PET). Cancer Invest 13:244–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Meegalla S, Plossl K, Kung MP, Chumpradit S, Stevenson DA et al (1996) Tc-99m-labeled tropanes as dopamine transporter imaging agents. Bioconjug Chem 7:421–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bartenstein P, Asenbaum S, Catafau A, Halldin C, Pilowski L et al (2002) European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for brain imaging using F-18 FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:BP43–BP48PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cikrit DF, Dalsing MC, Harting PS, Burt RW, Lalka SG et al (1997) Cerebral vascular reactivity assessed with acetazolamide single photon emission computer tomography scans before and after carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg 174:193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cummings JL (2004) Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 351:56–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kuzniecky R, Mountz JM, Thomas F (1993) Ictal 99mTc-HM-PAO Brain Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in electroencephalographic non-localizable partial seizures. J Neuroimaging 3:100–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kuzniecky R, Mountz JM, Wheatley G, Morawetz R (1993) Ictal single photon emission computed tomography demonstrates localized epileptogenesis in cortical dysplasia. Ann Neurol 34:627–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Laich E, Kuzniecky R, Mountz JM, Liu HG, Gilliam F et al (1997) Supplementary sensorimotor area epilepsy: identification of the epileptogenic zone and propagation pathways using ictal SPECT. Brain 120:855–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Knowlton RC, Lawn ND, Mountz JM, Buddhiwardhan O, Miller S et al (2004) Ictal single-photon emission computed tomography imaging in extra temporal lobe epilepsy using statistical parametric mapping. J Neuroimaging 14:324–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Knowlton RC, Lawn ND, Mountz JM, Kuzniecky RI (2004) Ictal SPECT analysis in epilepsy: subtraction and statistical parametric mapping techniques. Neurology 63:10–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Galynker II, Cai J, Ongseng F, Finestone H, Dutta E, Serseni D (1998) Hypofrontality and negative symptoms in major depressive disorder. J Nucl Med 39:608–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wilms G, Marchall G, Demaerel PH (1991) Gadolinium enhanced MRI of intracranial lesions. A review of indications and results. Clin Imaging 15:153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Valk PE, Dillon WP (1991) Diagnostic imaging of central nervous system radiation injury. In: Gutin PH, Leibel SA, Sheline GE (eds) Radiation injury to the central nervous system. Raven Press, New York, pp 211–237Google Scholar
- 28.Mountz JM, Deutsch G, Kuzniecky R, Rosenfeld SS (1994) Brain SPECT: 1994 update. In: Freeman LM (ed) Nuclear medicine annual. Raven Press, New York, pp 1–54Google Scholar
- 29.Schwartz RB, Holman BL, Polk JF et al (1998) Dual-isotope single photon emission computerized tomography scanning in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: association with patient survival and histopathological characteristics of tumor after high-dose radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 89:60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Kaplan WD, Takvorian T, Morris JH et al (1987) Thallium-201 brain imaging: a comparative study with pathologic correlation. J Nucl Med 28:47PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Black KL, Hawkins RA, Kim KT et al (1989) Use of thallium-201 SPECT to quantitate malignancy grade of gliomas. J Neurosurg 71:342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Lastoria S, Castelli L, Vergara E et al (1990) Human gliomas radioimmunoimaging with I-131 BC-2 murine IgG: preliminary report. J Nucl Med Allied Sci 34:173PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Ueda T, Kaji Y, Wakisaka S et al (1993) Time sequential single photon emission computed tomography studies in brain tumour using 201 Tl. Eur J Nucl Med 20:138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Cummings JL, Henchcliffe C, Schaier S et al (2011) The role of dopaminergic imaging in patients with symptoms of dopaminergic system neurodegeneration. J Brain 134:3146–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Djang DSW, Janssen MJR, Bohnen N (2012) SNM practice guidelines for dopamine transporter imaging with I-123 Ioflupane SPECT. J Nucl Med 53:154–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Gerasimou G, Costa DC, Papanastasiou E, Bostanjiopoulou S, Arnaoutoglou M et al (2012) SPECT study with I-123-Ioflupane (DaTSCAN) in patients with essential tremor. Is there any correlation with Parkinson’s disease? Ann Nucl Med 26:337–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar